Mir wrote:So you guys expect Russia to go full nuclear because ONE ATCMS got through
Evidently only enough of one to start a small fire.
Mir wrote:So you guys expect Russia to go full nuclear because ONE ATCMS got through
GarryB and Mir like this post
flamming_python, Karl Haushofer and The-thing-next-door like this post
The-thing-next-door wrote:Evidently only enough of one to start a small fire.
Robert.V, Karl Haushofer and owais.usmani like this post
Hole likes this post
flamming_python wrote:
But as caveat emptor said, how many get through and what they strike is not really the point
.
Mir wrote:@caveat emptor
Well cutting the cable is already doing much more damage than the single ATACMS hit.
I think they should actually pull the plugs on the two British carriers - they are so bad no-one will actually believe it's Putin's men who did it!
flamming_python, Karl Haushofer, Rodion_Romanovic and The-thing-next-door like this post
GarryB, Karl Haushofer, Rodion_Romanovic and Lapain like this post
GarryB and Lapain like this post
Robert.V, Vympel, Karl Haushofer, owais.usmani, lancelot, Rasisuki Nebia and Mir like this post
According to my understanding retaliatory measures will be covential hit inside Ukraine territory and probaply proxy actions somewhere. Using nukes for retalition could spin out of hand very easily. As Martyanov has pointed very often, there is no such a thing as "limited nuclear war".Mir wrote:So you guys expect Russia to go full nuclear because ONE ATCMS got through
Mir likes this post
Robert.V and Karl Haushofer like this post
Russia will hit NATO conventionally like Iran hit Israel wrote:
Robert.V and Karl Haushofer like this post
GarryB and Big_Gazza like this post
Karl Haushofer dislikes this post
flamming_python, Karl Haushofer and owais.usmani like this post
Arrow wrote:
Good joke
GarryB, Karl Haushofer, lancelot and Mir like this post
That anyone would hit Israel with 200 ballistic missiles was considered a joke too wrote:
Karl Haushofer and Rasisuki Nebia like this post
Mir wrote:@caveat emptor
Well cutting the cable is already doing much more damage than the single ATACMS hit.
I think they should actually pull the plugs on the two British carriers - they are so bad no-one will actually believe it's Putin's men who did it!
GarryB, kvs and Mir like this post
Arrow wrote:
Russia won't even lift a finger towards NATO, let alone attack with 200 ballistic missiles.
GarryB and Mir like this post
If they use the Storm Shadow in Russia, they should also ban the sale of enriched uranium to Europe. Hard quotas should be set based on actual use for everyone else. No resale of enriched uranium. We will see how the French like that.Godric wrote:Russia has made a start by banning the sale of Uranium to America, it also needs to stop the sales of Titanium along with China, also Russia needs to start backing the Ruble with gold & oil , i believe that alone would cause a negative run on the Dow Jones
GarryB, kvs and Mir like this post
Karl Haushofer dislikes this post
GarryB, Big_Gazza, kvs, LMFS, Hole, lancelot and Mir like this post
GarryB, Vympel, Big_Gazza, kvs, archangelski, nomadski, LMFS and like this post
GarryB likes this post
GarryB, Big_Gazza, Hole, lancelot and Mir like this post
caveat emptor wrote:@Mir
Of course not. But, retaliating strictly in Ukraine will not make any difference, as no one in the west gives a shit about Ukrainians. Cutting underwater cables in scale would be a possible, good answer to this latest escalation. It has to be painful enough and clear enough that it was a planned sabotage and not just a random occurrence. And going directly against western countries.
Changing nuclear deterrence doctrine doesn't mean much in this context. Also, don't run your mouth unless you intend to back it up with action.
flamming_python wrote:As pointed out, the West could care less about the Ukraine and targeting anything there will neither create deterrence nor impress anyone.
And I don't see what actions Russia could take through some proxy forces that can match missiles being launched against its territory.
I mean I don't deny the preference for deniability or a masquerade. Dress up as Somali pirates if you have to. But to do any serious damage Russian units will have to be employed, not the Houthis or whoever.
GarryB likes this post