Abortion should be illegal anyways.
I support the death penalty so I think abortion should be legal right up to retirement age...
I agree it is not a real deterrent, but it sure stops re-offending.
Abortion should be illegal anyways.
Werewolf wrote:Abortion should be illegal anyways.
ExBeobachter1987 wrote:Werewolf wrote:Abortion should be illegal anyways.
Bad idea. Societies where abortion is illegal are more violent and less peaceful.
Ohh yes, because not killing innocent babies makes a society violent so that is the reason why americans have such a violent society, because they can not kill innocent babies? Oh wait they can... That is by far the most stupid thing i've ever heared
Maybe communist gender egalitarianism that outlived communism?George1 wrote:Too high percentage in women, in former eastern European countries. Does this has an explanation?
George1 wrote:Too high percentage in women, in former eastern European countries. Does this has an explanation?
George1 wrote:Too high percentage in women, in former eastern European countries. Does this has an explanation?
GarryB wrote:Ohh yes, because not killing innocent babies makes a society violent so that is the reason why americans have such a violent society, because they can not kill innocent babies? Oh wait they can... That is by far the most stupid thing i've ever heared
No... I don't think it would be that... more like any government that thinks it can tell women they have to have a child no matter what after the process to create one has started sounds like the sort of government that will tell people to do all sorts of other things that are really more morality motivated than logically motivated.
Also we are talking about abortion, not killing babies.
A fetus is a potential baby... and billions of unfertilised eggs go wasted every year with potential children... the reality is that the Earth could not possibly support the numbers of children humans are able to create. If some mother thinks she is not ready to be a mother, or can't afford a child, or there are issues with how the pregnancy came about, who are you or I to say she must have the child?
That's simply not true and there is a huge argument against that idea. Even if it was, is limiting our potential by actively stopping our growth the way to deal with it? No, it's only delaying the problem.the reality is that the Earth could not possibly support the numbers of children humans are able to create.
That's simply not true and there is a huge argument against that idea. Even if it was, is limiting our potential by actively stopping our growth the way to deal with it? No, it's only delaying the problem.
Not enough men for the roles.
GarryB wrote:Given the choice between other animals or a few billion more humans...
magnumcromagnon wrote:Russia ranks #1 in the world in upward mobility for women in the workplace, that constitutes 40% of the business leadership roles in Russia, and Russia is 6 places ahead of France, 8 places ahead of Sweden, 24 places ahead of the United States, and 34 places ahead of Japan:
could always spin it the other way- one of the , if not the biggest factor for the success of the invading mongol horde is that back home the women run things, leaving the men free to do all the pillage and burn, and rape and enslave and kill stuff. then point how much of russian men are employed in military/paramilitary after mentioning the fact.Cyberspec wrote:magnumcromagnon wrote:Russia ranks #1 in the world in upward mobility for women in the workplace, that constitutes 40% of the business leadership roles in Russia, and Russia is 6 places ahead of France, 8 places ahead of Sweden, 24 places ahead of the United States, and 34 places ahead of Japan:
Ironic considering that one of the propaganda charges against Russia is that women don't have enough rights/opportunities.
However, I don't think you can argue that overpopulation is a Russian problem.
Women have dozens of options, condoms, pill, spiral, diafragma etc pp, what kind of society is it where a mother can declare a unborn child to no living being?
what i will get senteced with when i punch a women in the stumach and she loses the baby?
Will i get just fined for violance and hurting her or will i get jailed for murdering an unborn child?
great society we live in.
I actually have an adopted brother Garry. Yes, it's a hard road (he has two sisters, each with different families), but I shudder to think of his precious life simply cut short in the womb and he is/was by far worth the effort to raise.
No, life isn't Hollywood, and we should damn well man up and accept what life is throwing at us, go for that adoption, don't abort that child. Killing the child is a coward's way out, especially when there are so many other alternatives (certainly in most Western countries anyway) in today's world.
Would you kill a child because it hasn't reached adulthood and therefore is not a true human?
This is a military forum after all and I'd rather focus on the areas we do agree on, which is why I joined anyway. Respect to you Garry and your opinion.
eople make mistakes. None of those mentioned are 100% reliable.
Why don't you argue against cancer treatment... surely cancer cells have the right to exist if a fertilised egg is a human being.
Besides it doesn't matter what you or I think if that mother wants to get rid of the child i am sure she will find a way.
You would be sentenced to death for performing abortions without a licence... can't let just any idiot do that sort of thing... Twisted Evil
What a fallacy of argument, one is cancer an deformed way of growing cells that is clearly a disease, the other is intended for reproduction and everyone knows what sex is for...that bullshit coming out of you is kind of astonishing.
Most of this works 98-99% of the time, that does not back up the numbers of women getting an abortion, it also does not back up the numbers of alledgled rape victims, such thing is an absolute minority and that is called "Einzelschicksal" "individual fate", minorities can not be used as a generalisation for everything else.
It is just sickening that abortion can be performed to a point where the baby is not a fertilized egg, but a living being, with brain activity and beating heart up the the 15th pregnancy week where it has all organs developed to a point where it is not deniable that this is not a baby.
That is a genuine question, if a baby in womb is not counted as human life, i could beat her into the stoomach so she losses the baby without getting jailed for murder.
So what is the point and where exactly is the point that it changes from "fertilized egg" to human being?
It should be all fine punching pregnant women in stoomach as long they are not over their 15th week because i don't comit murder and i don't abortion the baby, abortion is a surgical invasion of human body, a punch is cosmetical and physical action.
Our society is simply disgusting at what point a baby counts as a baby and before that it counts as "fertilized egg", so human form at 15th pregnancy week is still a "fertilized egg"...sure.
abortion is murder period, you murder people, after 3 weeks the heart starts beating, after that is cold blooded murder and should be handled as such
also the earth can support with food 100billion people with ease, we are farming like our ancestors, its the old way and its dying out, vertical farming has already begun, its up to a 6000times as effective all year long without chemicals needed so 100% biological clean thats the future
7billion people is nothing
Kimppis wrote:So now the Finnish media is reporting about "Russia's terrible brain drain":
- One article states that over 200 000 people moved out the of the country last year. That is as many as during the late 90s/early 2000s. (Which is quite surprising actually, considering Russian population increased by almost 300K last year, if I'm not mistaken. And according to recent survey, the number of Russians wanting to move abroad has dropped to an all-time low.)
- One IT expert is interviewed. He says that the legal process (or whatever the term is) doesn't work at all (authorities' "meddling" with VK is used as an example) and that it's impossible to make an internationally succesful IT company in Russia (which seems to be factually incorrect, but whatever...), so he has to move to - you guessed it right - to the US.
- Brain drain strengthens authoritarianism in Russia, as qualified people move abroad and due to that the country is not changed from inside.
Thoughts?
as qualified people move abroad and due to that the country is not changed from inside.
Kimppis wrote:So now the Finnish media is reporting about "Russia's terrible brain drain":
- One article states that over 200 000 people moved out the of the country last year. That is as many as during the late 90s/early 2000s. (Which is quite surprising actually, considering Russian population increased by almost 300K last year, if I'm not mistaken. And according to recent survey, the number of Russians wanting to move abroad has dropped to an all-time low.)
- One IT expert is interviewed. He says that the legal process (or whatever the term is) doesn't work at all (authorities' "meddling" with VK is used as an example) and that it's impossible to make an internationally succesful IT company in Russia (which seems to be factually incorrect, but whatever...), so he has to move to - you guessed it right - to the US.
- Brain drain strengthens authoritarianism in Russia, as qualified people move abroad and due to that the country is not changed from inside.
Thoughts?