Ispan Thu Oct 13, 2016 2:18 pm
About the attack on Kominternovo, I am not a professional military, so I am not really qualified to give judgement, but by the reports from "Mage" and looking at the map it seems that it was not just another skirmish, but a rather serious attack, though local in nature and is being played down.
Artillery and mortar preparation, several attacks of at least a company sized group of mercenaries supported by some armored vehicles and lasting hours, attack carried out with resolve, juding by the 40 enemy casualties (one third dead) the novorussians report, wich in all past experience seem reasonable though own casualties are minimized and I expect them to be a third of the attackers... so all things considered, it looks like a reasonable well carried out attack following standard tactics and attempting to take ground or at least test the local defenses. "Mage" says it's the kind of attacks they expected during the summer, not the senseless skirmishing by small squads carried out by the ukropithecus during months.
In a nutshell, what I expect a infantry attack to be according to regulations and history book examples. Only thing missing is tanks in support. It shows that the mercenaries are better trained and willing to fight, though the high losses surprise me, unless the attack was much larger, in battallion strength and in relative comparison casualties are low, I don't think mercs are willing to take losses and is strange that they would obey orders to be used as line infantry. Raiding is more suited for them. The only other explanation I can think of is that the big casualties were caused not because determination of the attackers, but them, as usual, being hammered by Novorussian artillery. That would also explain the intense artillery duels throughout the day, and ongoing until the night, well after infantry fighting had subsided.