JohninMK wrote:Was there anything in the potential agreement about the US leaving Syria?
Isn't that implied by "...any foreign military power leave..."?
JohninMK wrote:Was there anything in the potential agreement about the US leaving Syria?
JohninMK wrote:SeigSoloyvov wrote:Well Assad turned down the kurds request for regional Automony
kinda stupid of him IMO.
Provided the kurds agreed to have any foreign military power leave, hand over control of the oil fields and give up their weapons.
That was a good deal for him.
Was there anything in the potential agreement about the US leaving Syria?
JohninMK wrote:SeigSoloyvov wrote:Well Assad turned down the kurds request for regional Automony
kinda stupid of him IMO.
Provided the kurds agreed to have any foreign military power leave, hand over control of the oil fields and give up their weapons.
That was a good deal for him.
Was there anything in the potential agreement about the US leaving Syria?
The source, who is a personal of the intelligence, added that both sides are not in a rush, and that slow advance is important so radical supporters on both sides accept and tolerate the upcoming changes.
I cannot answer that.
GarryB wrote:I cannot answer that.
You don't have to... they never leave... they are still in Germany and Japan...
Kurds can be dealt with later, the problem is the anti assad forces and ISIS.
From what I have seen many syrians in occupied areas want the government to go into rebel held areas to restore water and electricity and sewerage and start rebuilding... something the rebels and the Americans aren't bothering to help them with.
Wont take long for the people in occupied Syria to realise there is a benefit from having stability and a government that actually cares about Syria... as opposed to ISIS and others who just want to steal the oil and live the high life off the proceeds.
Russian envoy rejects Israel demand to expel Iran from Syria
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s repeated demands that Iranian forces and their allies be expelled from Syria. (AFP)
AFP, JerusalemTuesday, 31 July 2018 Text size A A A
Russia’s ambassador to Israel on Monday described as unrealistic Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s repeated demands that Iranian forces and their allies be expelled from Syria.
Russia is a key backer of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime alongside Iran and Lebanon’s Hezbollah -- two sworn enemies of Israel.
“The Iranians are playing a very, very important role in our common efforts to eliminate the terrorists in Syria,” Anatoly Viktorov said in English-language comments on Israel’s private Channel 10 broadcaster.
“That’s why, for this period of time, we see as non-realistic demands to expel any foreign troops from the territory of the Syrian Arab Republic,” he said.
Anatoly said Iran’s presence in Syria was “fully legitimate according to UN principles”.
Asked about the possibility of Russia expelling the Iranians from the war-hit country, the ambassador replied: “No, we cannot force them”.
Viktorov said Russia was “not okay” with the use of “force” by the Israeli government.
Air attacks often attributed to Israel have repeatedly struck Iranian targets or those of its ally Hezbollah in Syria.
The diplomat continued by saying Russia “cannot persuade Israel how to proceed” in Syria.
“It is not up to Russia to give (Israel) freedom to do anything or to prohibit anything,” he said.
Last Monday at a Jerusalem meeting between Netanyahu and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, Russia offered to keep Iranian forces 100 kilometers (62 miles) from Syria’s border with the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, according to an Israeli official.
The ambassador refused to confirm information about the deal.
Netanyahu in recent months has increased demands that Iran withdraw from Syria and not entrench itself militarily.
While it has been careful not to be dragged into the conflict next door, Israel has on several occasions struck Syrian territory -- including convoys of weapons it says are bound for Hezbollah.
Israel has been on high alert since June 19, when Syrian government forces launched an offensive to retake southern Daraa and Quneitra provinces, the latter of which includes the divided Golan Heights.
Israel seized 1,200 square kilometers (460 square miles) of the Golan Heights from Syria in the 1967 Six-Day War, in a move never recognized internationally. The two countries technically remain still at war.
Last Update: Tuesday, 31 July 2018 KSA 08:37 - GMT 05:37
They were forced out of Cuba, of Vietnam, of Laos, of Cambodia, of Iran, of Uzbekistan, of Kyrgyzstan and of many other countries.
GarryB wrote:
They were forced out of Cuba, of Vietnam, of Laos, of Cambodia, of Iran, of Uzbekistan, of Kyrgyzstan and of many other countries.
Indeed... they can be forced to leave, but rarely leave on their own by their own choice...
GarryB wrote:I cannot answer that.
You don't have to... they never leave... they are still in Germany and Japan...
Kurds can be dealt with later, the problem is the anti assad forces and ISIS.
From what I have seen many syrians in occupied areas want the government to go into rebel held areas to restore water and electricity and sewerage and start rebuilding... something the rebels and the Americans aren't bothering to help them with.
Wont take long for the people in occupied Syria to realise there is a benefit from having stability and a government that actually cares about Syria... as opposed to ISIS and others who just want to steal the oil and live the high life off the proceeds.
SeigSoloyvov wrote:
I'd like to see who is going to force us out Russia? they don't care about that side of Syria, Turkey plz, Assad? don't make me laugh. Iran now that shit is funny, Syria isn't those countries it's a much different nut.
You can ask Afghan and Iraq how hard getting us to leave can be.
BUT even if you get us to leave The gulf states will simply park others in our place.
SeigSoloyvov wrote:I'd like to see who is going to force us out Russia? they don't care about that side of Syria, Turkey plz, Assad? don't make me laugh. Iran now that shit is funny, Syria isn't those countries it's a much different nut.
You can ask Afghan and Iraq how hard getting us to leave can be.
BUT even if you get us to leave The gulf states will simply park others in our place.
JohninMK wrote:Now, what is next? Bear these comments in mind
Within Syria
@WithinSyriaBlog
15m15 minutes ago
All reports of a near operation of the SAA in Idlib are false and baseless, yes there may be an operation in some areas, however, no operation in Idlib as a whole.
Leith Aboufadel
Verified account @leithfadel
3h3 hours ago
Leith Aboufadel Retweeted Timur Akhmetov
There won’t be an offensive to capture Idlib. The only thing in the works is a Jisr Al-Shugour offensive near the Latakia provincial border. Idlib city is out of the question. The provincial capital and other towns in Idlib will likely remain under a Turkish protectorate
#Russian President's special envoy to #Syria Lavrentiev stated there are yet no plans on offensive in #Idlib, but moderate opposition should cooperate with #Turkey to remove threats to #RuAF #Khmeimim in #Latakia, #SAA military coming from terrorist groups especially![/i]