Britain dismisses reports about air force orders in Iraq
Britain dismisses reports about air force in Iraq
Rodinazombie wrote:Just out of interest, what kind of altitude are us/uk planes carrying out their air strikes from compared to russian?
magnumcromagnon wrote:This is interesting:
The cost of Russian military operations in Syria will be about $ 1 billion a year.
Not bad, considering that the operation is supposed to only last 4 months, and if that claim holds true it'll cost approx. $300 million. A small price to pay to prevent the Wahabbi vermin carrying out terror attacks on Russian soil (considering all the Chechen extremists), and besides I'm sure Russian companies will be rewarded handsomely in hydrocarbon and arms supply contracts from Syria, Iraq, and Iran.
JohninMK wrote:Sense is prevailing in the air
Read more: http://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20151012/1028370993/US-Aircraft-Make-Way-Russian-Jets-Syria.html#ixzz3oLVtp1Dg
Vann7 wrote:
Wow look at this footage.. is insane.. is apparently from Hama..
Mi-24 hellicopters being shot by terrorist for long time with waves of machine guns...
but apparently not strong enough to damage them,and it seemed that aside of the birds..
that appears to show in video , there were attacks by manpads too ..at very close kill distance ?
Can anyone confirm this? It looks like a few manpads portable missiles were fired on the Mi-24 hellicopters but somehow they miss and never explode..and at times it appears to look like at times some projectiles fired at the hellicopters.. are deflected by the hellicopters.. but maybe
is just birds.. in any case.. it looks crazy dangerous.. close to suicide.. what they did.. to fight so close to the terrorist and continue flying like nothing. Maybe the shots were all Ak-47..? and the manpads not properly used..
Trust me what those guys did there was totally crazy.. not even tanks charge at terrorist positions in that way..if they using anti tank rockets.. but the video is really impressive ,
how the mi-24 keep flying. But again we cannot know for sure how dangerous was without knowing the weapons used against them.
"Наша задача заключается в том, чтобы стабилизировать законную власть и создать условия для поиска политического компромисса", - сказал он в интервью программе "Воскресный вечер с Владимиром Соловьевым" на телеканале "Россия-1".
"Our objective is to stabilize the legitimate authority and create conditions for a political compromise", - he said in an interview with the program "Sunday Night with Vladimir Solovyov" on TV channel "Russia-1".
Вот за что я люблю наши кремлевские власти, так это за выдающуюся сообразительность. Всего-то две недели повоевали и уже скорректировали планы! Уже не "разгром террористов ИГИЛ", а нечто пусть столь же недостижимое (имеющимися силами и в среднесрочной перспективе), но куда более скромное. Так, глядишь, через месяц-другой реинкарнируются на новой почве пропагандистские "мантры" о том, что сирийцы "сами должны воевать с ИГИЛ, а не бежать в Европу" - с логичным выводом: "сами, всё сами!"
That's what I love our Kremlin authorities, so it is for the outstanding intelligence. Just something to war two weeks and have already adjusted plans! It is not the "defeat of terrorists ISIL" and let something as unattainable (available forces and in the medium term), but much more modest. So, you see, a month or reincarnate on the basis of a new propaganda "mantra" that the Syrians "have to fight for themselves with ISIL and not flee to Europe" - a logical conclusion, "themselves, all by yourself!"
flamming_python wrote:KoTeMoRe wrote:Regular wrote:
Kedmi, ex Mossad guy speaking about Russia. Sry only in Russian
That Jewish accent is Horrible, looks like French people learnt Russian.
He doesn't have a Jewish accent at all, pure Russian - it's just he uses some Israeli mannerisms; like a kinda Hebrew way of talking and phrasing some things - but in Russian. But his actual accent and pronunciation isn't Israeli.
He talks a little funny in this video but that's probably coz he has a cold or sinus blockage or something.
Rodinazombie wrote:
Erk wrote:Rodinazombie wrote:
The damage to buildings is extreme.
The question that's always in the back of my mind, how is Syria going to afford the reconstruction if they win against the Jihadists?
Tony Cartalucci - US Senate Hearing Discusses Using Refugees as Human Shields in Syria
http://journal-neo.org/2015/10/12/us-senate-hearing-discusses-using-refugees-as-human-shields-in-syria/
A recent US Senate hearing regarding Russia’s ongoing air campaign in Syria plumbed dark depths when it was actually proposed by retired US Army General John M. Keane that “free zones” be established for armed militants, and populated with refugees to deter Russian attacks.
In essence, General Keane’s plan is to use refugees as human shields, and leverage any attack on this established “free zone” as a means of manipulating public opinion.
The US Strategy Until Now
The recent multinational anti-terror operation led by Russia at the request of the Syrian government has dealt the United States and its narrative regarding its own military intervention in Syria a severe blow.
It has become abundantly clear that not only has the United States been arming and funding extremists inside of Syria, including groups operating in tandem with listed terrorist organizations like Al Qaeda’s Al Nusra Front, it also appears that the US has feigned its campaign against the so-called “Islamic State” (ISIS/ISIL).
I don't need to trust you back in the day Mk Crocodiles were doing the same kind of moves against UCK militants. It's SOP with Crocodiles because it is that fast down low and very suvivable. Under 100m you can't lock with a ManPad in that cluttered environement. The biggest trouble is well placed AAA fire but usually those grass cuts are done once the artillery has done blowing up visible positions.
There's an RPG fired towards the second Croc and it failed to come even close. Ballers.
NationalRus wrote:
I don't need to trust you back in the day Mk Crocodiles were doing the same kind of moves against UCK militants. It's SOP with Crocodiles because it is that fast down low and very suvivable. Under 100m you can't lock with a ManPad in that cluttered environement. The biggest trouble is well placed AAA fire but usually those grass cuts are done once the artillery has done blowing up visible positions.
There's an RPG fired towards the second Croc and it failed to come even close. Ballers.
no its risky as fuck
NationalRus wrote:
I don't need to trust you back in the day Mk Crocodiles were doing the same kind of moves against UCK militants. It's SOP with Crocodiles because it is that fast down low and very suvivable. Under 100m you can't lock with a ManPad in that cluttered environement. The biggest trouble is well placed AAA fire but usually those grass cuts are done once the artillery has done blowing up visible positions.
There's an RPG fired towards the second Croc and it failed to come even close. Ballers.
no its risky as fuck
Not when manoeuvering and chaffing. It is actually less dangerous than flying high. And all those were killed with no countermeasure and two of them while ferrying (Ukraine, and Armenian).