If the target turned off their radar signal mid flight the missile will still land amongst the target vehicles and with a 150kg HE frag warhead likely have damaged the antenna effectively enough.
+62
Daniel_Admassu
lyle6
GarryB
LMFS
gc3762
KoTeMoRe
lancelot
TMA1
PeregrineFalcon
Backman
Hole
dino00
Tai Hai Chen
Scorpius
Arrow
thegopnik
Isos
nero
zepia
FFjet
secretprojects
Begome
Gomig-21
limb
Mindstorm
SeigSoloyvov
wilhelm
jaguar_br
tomazy
Stealthflanker
PapaDragon
owais.usmani
Sujoy
AlfaT8
Singular_Transform
The-thing-next-door
marcellogo
RTN
Azi
ahmedfire
x_54_u43
ultimatewarrior
JohninMK
Austin
Tsavo Lion
Giulio
jhelb
tanino
kvs
mnztr
Rodion_Romanovic
PhSt
Vann7
Viktor
Big_Gazza
archangelski
magnumcromagnon
miketheterrible
calripson
william.boutros
George1
ult
66 posters
Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
GarryB- Posts : 40558
Points : 41060
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°451
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
Since it entered service the AS-11 missile could not be carried by just any aircraft.... only a select few were able to carry and use it, and it came with a targeting pod that detected the target signals and triangulated the target location before launch.
If the target turned off their radar signal mid flight the missile will still land amongst the target vehicles and with a 150kg HE frag warhead likely have damaged the antenna effectively enough.
If the target turned off their radar signal mid flight the missile will still land amongst the target vehicles and with a 150kg HE frag warhead likely have damaged the antenna effectively enough.
Hole- Posts : 11125
Points : 11103
Join date : 2018-03-24
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
- Post n°452
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
GarryB, kvs and Gomig-21 like this post
Hole- Posts : 11125
Points : 11103
Join date : 2018-03-24
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
- Post n°453
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
magnumcromagnon and Gomig-21 like this post
magnumcromagnon- Posts : 8138
Points : 8273
Join date : 2013-12-05
Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan
- Post n°454
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
It would be cool if future versions of the Su-57 had the 2 main bomb bays be unified in to one large bomb bay for much longer munitions, but also have optional modular munition place holders that would naturally be of shorter length with shorter bomb bay doors for smaller munitions.
The smaller munition place holder would be necessary because it would ideally block off the rest of the internal space from compromising the RCS, additionally the smaller munitions means they would have shorter range and the Su-57 would have to launch them closer to the target and would be more susceptible to be detected by tactical level radars, so it would have a radar blocker near the end of the munition place holders length (the end extending to other side of the bombay). The unified bay munitions would have much greater range than the former, and the Su-57 would be less likely to be detected when it's launching the longer range munition. Now imagine if the Su-57 launch modified versions of the Kh-101/102 or Zircon/Khinzal closer to their original lengths!
LMFS- Posts : 5169
Points : 5165
Join date : 2018-03-03
- Post n°455
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
magnumcromagnon wrote:
It would be cool if future versions of the Su-57 had the 2 main bomb bays be unified in to one large bomb bay for much longer munitions, but also have optional modular munition place holders that would naturally be of shorter length with shorter bomb bay doors for smaller munitions.
That is probably not going to happen, the plane's structure relies heavily on that central section between the bays to distribute the loads.
magnumcromagnon- Posts : 8138
Points : 8273
Join date : 2013-12-05
Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan
- Post n°456
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
LMFS wrote:magnumcromagnon wrote:
It would be cool if future versions of the Su-57 had the 2 main bomb bays be unified in to one large bomb bay for much longer munitions, but also have optional modular munition place holders that would naturally be of shorter length with shorter bomb bay doors for smaller munitions.
That is probably not going to happen, the plane's structure relies heavily on that central section between the bays to distribute the loads.
I'm not proposing anything extreme here, just utilizing the (small) space in between the 2 bomb bays, so they can launch extra-long range munitions when they need to. When they don't need to use extreme long weapons, they can place smaller compartments back in the space to restore whatever lost functionality. The extreme long range munition will be launched (with the right tactics) far beyond the enemies capacity to intercept the Su-57, so whatever temporary loss in the fuselages' structural stability, it'll be a small price to pay as it's very unlikely to dog fight (and thus experience high g-forces) during that sortie.
GarryB- Posts : 40558
Points : 41060
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°457
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
If the weapon is extreme long range then stealth becomes less important so carry it externally... or better still put it on an Su-30 or Su-35...
Personally I would rather see a new version of the Su-57 that is like a new stealthy Su-34 version of the Su-57 that is the equivalent to the Su-34 is to the Su-35.
Not designed for such high speed but with the engines located two or three times further apart and with much bigger internal weapon bays and perhaps not designed for supersonic flight but with all internal weapons...
Personally I would rather see a new version of the Su-57 that is like a new stealthy Su-34 version of the Su-57 that is the equivalent to the Su-34 is to the Su-35.
Not designed for such high speed but with the engines located two or three times further apart and with much bigger internal weapon bays and perhaps not designed for supersonic flight but with all internal weapons...
magnumcromagnon- Posts : 8138
Points : 8273
Join date : 2013-12-05
Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan
- Post n°458
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
GarryB wrote:If the weapon is extreme long range then stealth becomes less important so carry it externally... or better still put it on an Su-30 or Su-35...
Personally I would rather see a new version of the Su-57 that is like a new stealthy Su-34 version of the Su-57 that is the equivalent to the Su-34 is to the Su-35.
Not designed for such high speed but with the engines located two or three times further apart and with much bigger internal weapon bays and perhaps not designed for supersonic flight but with all internal weapons...
Sure, extreme range weapons won't need the platform to be as stealthy as possible, but with it stored internally the vehicle will be less affected by drag, so ideally the munition can be launched as high and as fast as possible.
PapaDragon- Posts : 13475
Points : 13515
Join date : 2015-04-26
Location : Fort Evil, Serbia
- Post n°459
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
magnumcromagnon wrote:It would be cool if future versions of the Su-57 had the 2 main bomb bays be unified in to one large bomb bay for much longer munitions...
I think the are saving that feature for MiG-41/PAK DP
GarryB likes this post
GarryB- Posts : 40558
Points : 41060
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°460
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
The MiG-41 would certainly offer the best performance boost in terms of launch speed and altitude... a bit like taking old nonupgraded MiG-31s to carry Kinzhal.
There are photos of the MiG-31K carrying bigger missiles for anti satellite or perhaps emergency satellite launch capacity to fill any gaps that might exist with a temporary satellite or to replace those lost in combat...
There are photos of the MiG-31K carrying bigger missiles for anti satellite or perhaps emergency satellite launch capacity to fill any gaps that might exist with a temporary satellite or to replace those lost in combat...
Gomig-21- Posts : 746
Points : 748
Join date : 2016-07-17
- Post n°461
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
BTW, talking to a couple of other fellas on another military forum and I expressed my displeasure at the complete disrespect and insulting of this amazing aircraft by NATO to give it the disgusting nickname "Felon." Whomever came up with that is a full blown jerk, but so are all the other who agreed and/or voted for that name to be the NATO designation for this aircraft. Despicable.
Some of the previous names weren't so flattering, either, such as "Frogfoot" or "Fagot" or even "Fishbed", but this one has to take the cake. Felon? Really?
Some of the previous names weren't so flattering, either, such as "Frogfoot" or "Fagot" or even "Fishbed", but this one has to take the cake. Felon? Really?
Hole- Posts : 11125
Points : 11103
Join date : 2018-03-24
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
- Post n°462
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
The name should be F-ucker. F for fighter (like in F-15, F-16 and so on)
Gomig-21 likes this post
magnumcromagnon- Posts : 8138
Points : 8273
Join date : 2013-12-05
Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan
- Post n°463
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
They should give the F-35 the designation 'Turd Burglar.'
Gomig-21 likes this post
PapaDragon- Posts : 13475
Points : 13515
Join date : 2015-04-26
Location : Fort Evil, Serbia
- Post n°464
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
Gomig-21 wrote:...Some of the previous names weren't so flattering, either, such as "Frogfoot" or "Fagot" or even "Fishbed", but this one has to take the cake. Felon? Really?
I like it
It has a touch of bravado, a daring do
Gomig-21 likes this post
lyle6- Posts : 2599
Points : 2593
Join date : 2020-09-13
Location : Philippines
- Post n°465
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
Its awesome. How sick of a burn would it be to hear the famous MJ catch after getting shot down by a Su-57:Gomig-21 wrote:BTW, talking to a couple of other fellas on another military forum and I expressed my displeasure at the complete disrespect and insulting of this amazing aircraft by NATO to give it the disgusting nickname "Felon." Whomever came up with that is a full blown jerk, but so are all the other who agreed and/or voted for that name to be the NATO designation for this aircraft. Despicable.
Some of the previous names weren't so flattering, either, such as "Frogfoot" or "Fagot" or even "Fishbed", but this one has to take the cake. Felon? Really?
"YOUVE BEEN HIT BY - YOUVE BEEN STRUCK BY - A SMOOTH CRIMINAL"?
In comparison, NATO nicknames for their own aircraft are just plain boring, like someone ran them through a focus group, which they totally have. The F-35 didn't even get its own nickname, and the raptor, oh don't get me started on that. Who names their aircraft after extinct lizards? Squares, that's who.
dino00 and Gomig-21 like this post
Gomig-21- Posts : 746
Points : 748
Join date : 2016-07-17
- Post n°466
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
You guys realize a felon is a person who has been convicted of a felony, right? A felony is a crime in most civilized societies that use that term lol. There's nothing cool or badass or tough or complimentary in any way, shape or form. It's nothing short of an insult, really. And it's obvious that they did it on purpose, of course, which makes it even more irritating.
A smooth criminal might be a stretch.
They had to label it negatively because they still need to make a villain out of Russia, and for it to still be the enemy to make NATO relevant after the end of the Soviet Union and the Cold War.
If needing to stick with the letter F for a starter, then looking at the list there's plenty:
Fire
Fierce
Force
Freedom
Future
etc.
So many better ones that friggin Felon!
Ok, I've vented enough about that.
A smooth criminal might be a stretch.
They had to label it negatively because they still need to make a villain out of Russia, and for it to still be the enemy to make NATO relevant after the end of the Soviet Union and the Cold War.
If needing to stick with the letter F for a starter, then looking at the list there's plenty:
Fire
Fierce
Force
Freedom
Future
etc.
So many better ones that friggin Felon!
Ok, I've vented enough about that.
lyle6- Posts : 2599
Points : 2593
Join date : 2020-09-13
Location : Philippines
- Post n°467
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
I'm of the opinion that its better to be openly reviled than lured in by false notions of friendship. Besides, being called a felon is practically a term of endearment in today's America, what with its open endorsement of criminals and criminal behaviour. You'd just have to forgive them for their preference.Gomig-21 wrote:You guys realize a felon is a person who has been convicted of a felony, right? A felony is a crime in most civilized societies that use that term lol. There's nothing cool or badass or tough or complimentary in any way, shape or form. It's nothing short of an insult, really. And it's obvious that they did it on purpose, of course, which makes it even more irritating.
A smooth criminal might be a stretch.
They had to label it negatively because they still need to make a villain out of Russia, and for it to still be the enemy to make NATO relevant after the end of the Soviet Union and the Cold War.
If needing to stick with the letter F for a starter, then looking at the list there's plenty:
Fire
Fierce
Force
Freedom
Future
etc.
So many better ones that friggin Felon!
Ok, I've vented enough about that.
Also, most of those words you suggest won't fly - the Su-57 is a jet so it needs two syllables. So we can scratch fire (a well used verb in combat chatter), fierce, and force (also words that aren't out of place in combat chatter either i.e. "fierce resistance", or "enemy force up ahead"). Freedom is patented American, and future is just way too vague. Something like flechette sounds better and really describes how a Su-57 is meant to perform in combat but its not as strong sounding.
Gomig-21 likes this post
GarryB- Posts : 40558
Points : 41060
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°468
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
It is not a HATO code AFAIK, they use it, but they don't decide it... it used to be the Air Standards Coordination Committee, or ASCC that used to decide on the code name which is made up of what has become the five eyes group of bastards... US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand...
I think the name is petty and shows the childish nature of the countries that chose the name and how spiteful they are... just a reminder to Russia how lucky they are to not be on good relations with such spoiled self absorbed arseholes.
I think the name is petty and shows the childish nature of the countries that chose the name and how spiteful they are... just a reminder to Russia how lucky they are to not be on good relations with such spoiled self absorbed arseholes.
dino00 and Gomig-21 like this post
Isos- Posts : 11603
Points : 11571
Join date : 2015-11-06
- Post n°469
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
GarryB wrote:It is not a HATO code AFAIK, they use it, but they don't decide it... it used to be the Air Standards Coordination Committee, or ASCC that used to decide on the code name which is made up of what has become the five eyes group of bastards... US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand...
I think the name is petty and shows the childish nature of the countries that chose the name and how spiteful they are... just a reminder to Russia how lucky they are to not be on good relations with such spoiled self absorbed arseholes.
And they probably pay them 3000-4000$ per month to pick up names... because they found that job thanks to a friend or family member.
Hole likes this post
Gomig-21- Posts : 746
Points : 748
Join date : 2016-07-17
- Post n°470
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
GarryB wrote:It is not a HATO code AFAIK, they use it, but they don't decide it... it used to be the Air Standards Coordination Committee, or ASCC that used to decide on the code name which is made up of what has become the five eyes group of bastards... US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand...
New Zealand, too? NATO must have something to do with it if they call it a "NATO designation".
I think it's pretty clear through all the decades since its creation who's been driving that organization because of the money it was putting into it giving it the most clout. Except you can't say the US was much involved in this recent naming since it pulled out back in 2017 IIRC. So this is from the current members sans the US.
GarryB wrote:I think the name is petty and shows the childish nature of the countries that chose the name and how spiteful they are... just a reminder to Russia how lucky they are to not be on good relations with such spoiled self absorbed arseholes.
There you go! This is the kind of anger I was thinking most would be feeling about this. I think it's such a disgraceful thing to do and this is probably the worst designation to date! Bastards. lol
JohninMK- Posts : 15656
Points : 15797
Join date : 2015-06-16
Location : England
- Post n°471
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
Love the name. Felon, the invisible thief in the night, your goodies and valuables are gone, just a mess left behind and your alarms detected nothing.
The namers certainly had more nous that those coming up with Faggot.
The namers certainly had more nous that those coming up with Faggot.
Gomig-21 likes this post
The-thing-next-door- Posts : 1394
Points : 1450
Join date : 2017-09-18
Location : Uranus
- Post n°472
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
Gomig-21 wrote:
There you go! This is the kind of anger I was thinking most would be feeling about this. I think it's such a disgraceful thing to do and this is probably the worst designation to date! Bastards. lol
The worst to date is thier term for the Sarmat, childish as hell and if you fail to see how ironic it is then you are retarded. I would have said the R-36 but that is not as retardedly ironic as them giving the name to a modern Russian missile.
The whole alternate designation system is retarded, childish and completely pointless.
Gomig-21 likes this post
PapaDragon- Posts : 13475
Points : 13515
Join date : 2015-04-26
Location : Fort Evil, Serbia
- Post n°473
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
JohninMK wrote:Love the name. Felon, the invisible thief in the night, your goodies and valuables are gone, just a mess left behind and your alarms detected nothing...
People keep forgetting that the whole gangsta' ghetto thing is considered cool in USA these days and that this name is definitely considered more flattering by those who came up with it than most people think
The-thing-next-door wrote:The worst to date is thier term for the Sarmat, childish as hell and if you fail to see how ironic it is then you are retarded. I would have said the R-36 but that is not as retardedly ironic as them giving the name to a modern Russian missile.
Sarmat doesn't have NATO designation yet
If you are talking about SS-18 Satan it's the coolest name for a weapon ever given
LMFS- Posts : 5169
Points : 5165
Join date : 2018-03-03
- Post n°474
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
The-thing-next-door wrote:The whole alternate designation system is retarded, childish and completely pointless.
Have to agree there
GarryB- Posts : 40558
Points : 41060
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°475
Re: Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #6
New Zealand, too? NATO must have something to do with it if they call it a "NATO designation".
Old boys club... would not surprise me if the whole system is based around what school you went to... so boys from Eton in the UK can join, and Harvard from the US and perhaps Auckland Grammar in New Zealand etc etc etc...
People who would not speak to you on the street...
There you go! This is the kind of anger I was thinking most would be feeling about this. I think it's such a disgraceful thing to do and this is probably the worst designation to date! Bastards. lol
Passed anger... they are just noise... western publications doing stories about the I-16... a significant aircraft... and they call it the rat... Rata... which is what the Spanish nazis called it in the Spanish civil war... fuck them.
The namers certainly had more nous that those coming up with Faggot.
PC brigade means they couldn't call it that now if they wanted to...
People keep forgetting that the whole gangsta' ghetto thing is considered cool in USA these days and that this name is definitely considered more flattering by those who came up with it than most people think
I appreciate not everyone is going to be happy and their ultimate job is to find words that are distinct and can be distinguished on radio communications, and not sound like other words that need to be used including the names of friendly types as well, but they are still a bunch of dicks.
They need it for their purposes but we can use the real names and designations.