When guidance is cut, missile fly ballistically, so its fly path was predictable after missing the plane.
Is it ballistic though... does it shut down the engine and then just fall, or does it just keep flying till the fuel runs out and then falls?
When guidance is cut, missile fly ballistically, so its fly path was predictable after missing the plane.
Unless you have a death wish you do not provoke a stronger enemy, you wait until you have gained sufficient strength to at least make that enemy think. I'd say that Syria/Russia/Iran have played a pretty astute game, being much better placed now than 5 years ago. That is the game now playing out.nomadski wrote:If it was not for Iranian complacency and Russian caution in Syria, in the first place, then escalation and killing and continued bombardment by Usraelis in Syria and.... Would have not happened.
I understand why the Usraelis feel suffocated. All around they see enemies. Because they are not just a displaced people. But also a misplaced people. No cure for their sickness, other than death or emigration.
flamming_python, elconquistador and starman like this post
nomadski wrote:Better approach. However attacker together with general details of injuries or deaths or damage to all sides, should be told to the PEOPLE . No more cover up. No need for officials to do " ANALYSIS" or decide. The people analyse. They decide. THEY DECIDE....... Officials do what they are told by the people ( parliament). They declare war. They accept defeat or victory. You are responsible to supply FACTS. FACTS ONLY.
Yugo90 likes this post
You are far too pessimistic. Iran is getting stronger all the time, in part due to investing in making its friends stronger. I have no doubt that an oil for fighters deal is underway. The days when Israel could attack are now gone.nomadski wrote:
Iran's power will not be growing now, with all the sanctions. No big purchase of fighter aircraft or their manufacture in any significant number. Army probably can not get any stronger. Navy expansion needs decades and massive investment, not displayed by available numbers. Missile force is at maximum. No Nukes because of internal politics. Diplomacy is at dead-end. While there is actual physical damage to infrastructure by attacks, and even worse the continuous psychological damage to morale by attacks not properly responded to.
lancelot likes this post
SaneBomber likes this post
JohninMK likes this post
Mig-31BM2 Super Irbis-E wrote:...
Israel can do what it wants. When is it finally end? ...
GarryB wrote:The Russian components are there to defend Russian forces and Russian bases, Israel is free to "defend" itself by striking targets it will claim to be Iranian weapon stores or threats to Israel.
Of course Syria does not have unlimited air defence systems or capabilities and I am sure they don't have all their best systems protecting plastic factories.
starman likes this post
Hole wrote:So the american and european taxpayers spend another 100 million bucks to destroy an old factory worth 50.000 bucks. Great victory for the western countries!
crod wrote:GarryB wrote:The Russian components are there to defend Russian forces and Russian bases, Israel is free to "defend" itself by striking targets it will claim to be Iranian weapon stores or threats to Israel.
Of course Syria does not have unlimited air defence systems or capabilities and I am sure they don't have all their best systems protecting plastic factories.
No indeed not however with them carry out hundreds of strikes already with who knows how many more to come, there won’t be much manufacturing left = less jobs, weaker economic activity post war. Perhaps that’s part of their military strategy, to weaken Syria in every possible way and do it under the guise of their ‘defending’ horse shit mantra.
nomadski likes this post
Backman dislikes this post
par far likes this post
miketheterrible wrote:I actually agree that Russia should be also intercepting those missiles Israel launches if they are getting closer to Russia's controlled sector. To make it clear to Israel without actually posturing hard.
But it may be a case that such missiles can only be intercepted at rather close ranges. What most posters here forget, or ignore, is that missiles that fly low, doesn't matter if the S-400 has 300km range. That range is reduced greatly unless there is an AWACS flying around and picking up said objects at long ranges.
Otherwise, the system is there to protect against fighter jets, bombers and other bigger targets that do not fly low. For engaging missiles, it is more up to Tor, Buk or Pantsir to hit those and I'm not sure Russia has BUKS in Syria.
So that would mean those missiles would have to be flying within range of about 20km or so.