We are talking about Russia with a full multilayered ABM system geared towards stopping the entire us arsenal If a place is radioactive you evacuate everyone and block it if for a few decades until the radiation clears, it is not that big a problem.
The thing is that for a few missiles it might work... but for thousands of nuclear detonations there is going to be a lot of radiation everywhere there are cites... and all the places that are easy or nice to live in already have cities which will be targeted, so having to move people to other places and start again is going to be a pain in the ass... how do you feed and look after the people for a start when there is nothing?
Lots of people will die in the attack and lots more will die in the chaos afterwards... moving to big empty places wont feed our house anyone...
Russia is much better prepared than any western country but even they will struggle..
You seem to think that nuclear war is some sort of cosmic scale event that has a predetermined outcome that is impossible to alter,
its a war not ragnarok or the apocalypse just a little war.
Yeah, I don't believe in religious prophesy... people from 1,000 years ago aren't able to predict what will happen now any more than we can predict what will happen in 5 years time.
The fact is that the west is on the decline and great powers have collapsed before... but not powers with lots of nuclear weapons... imagine if Hitler had nukes when the Soviets were rolling in to Berlin... he might not have used them before hand because he feared the Soviets or British or French or Americans or Chinese might have used theirs against him and killed him... but in the jaws of defeat he didn't care about his people... he expected them to fight to the death so if he had any he would have used them and not cared about the response.... America could be the same... or those at the top might think they can escape and survive somewhere else... I think nuclear war is more likely now than ever before because Americans are voting in idiots and don't care that they are voting in sales people selling them shit to get in and making the rich richer when they get in and screw the people.
And unlike in western films in reality there is no mandate that after WWIII morality is obsolete that is just a foolish fantasy of moronic western writers who are obsessed with animal like behaviour.
Ask Bear Grylls... in a survival situation you think of yourself first... and after WWIII there is probably no justice system to say who was right or wrong... just the first to kill survives and takes what the dead had.... anybody calls them on it and they can shoot them too.
Thinking people will be nice or decent is cute... tell that to a poisonous snake or bear in the woods that they shouldn't eat you when they are cold and hungry and tired...
What the hell makes you think that the government would not survive and have plans for such an eventuality?
thousands of nuclear detonations... the first few might make radar and radio communications ineffectual... and then all bets could be off.
Do you honestly think that the Russian government will rely on the goodwill of monumentally arrogant warmongering retards who would not know reality if it heit them in the face with a mace the size of the moon?
Of course not and of course they shouldn't... but enormous deathtolls and the famines and diseases that follow mean population problems wont be a problem for quite a while... you'd actually probably be better off in Asia or Africa or central or south america....
You watch too many western films, people (in Russia atleast) are far more likely to cooperate towards mutual survival than to be dumb enough to assume that becoming a bandit will be a better choice than a farmer.
Do you know where the english word for Farmer comes from?
It comes from the old English word farme... which mean rent or revenue. The first Farmers were rent collectors who took money from people who worked the land... it made them rich enough to be able to buy land themselves... so a person whose last name is Farmer was not a farmer... they were rent collectors...
who became land owners...
Say Moscow gets a multilayer ABM system with around 750 interceptors the us would either need to fire mosto of its nuclear arsenal at one city in which case even if they succeed they would still have only taken out one city for say 50 years or they could simply not bother with attacking any major cities and target minor objects in which case Russia still wins.
Or a high orbit nuclear detonation generates and EMP pulse that blinds the systems to all other incoming threats...
The Russians are working hard to develop defences but the best defence is always to not have a war.
Thinking you can win a nuclear war is stupid.... Mad... suicide... that applies to the west as well as to Russia and China and India and Pakistan... sadly Israel probably thinks that is a good way to go... which is why their nukes are more dangerous than anyone elses...
What about the countries that come out with most major cities intact and almost everyone alive?
The world economy would be in tatters and need a complete rebuild... communication alone would be near impossible to restore for the next few decades because the satellite war would mean there is so much debris all satellites would be destroyed and further add to the problems even if anyone could launch any more...
World food production would plummet but the population would not immediately drop by the same amount so people will be hungry and decisions will be made about the sick and the weak... when there is little food do you keep feeding everyone or start to feed the strong so they can rebuild and work while the weak are left to die... lack of medication will kill a lot of people too... in some places there wont be enough living strong people to bury the dead... so the wild animal populations will increase and encroach on places people are...
the us has to engage both Russia and China if they don't want to be colonised so how will they bypass future Russian ABM systems exactly?
Why would Russians want to colonise anywhere? After WWIII most of America will be irradiated or damaged and the places that aren't will be filled with armed nutters...
Are we talking about nuclear weapons or pandoras boxes here? there are not enough nuclear weapons on the entire planet to fully wipeout either side, only their major cities.
You don't have to cut a person into tiny 1 cubic cm chunks to kill them... a few important locations and they will never be the same again.
What makes you think that such vermin could be trusted? What makes you think that they would eagerly conspire with the people who want them all to be removed from society?
The people they get to do their bidding might not have any idea of what the end goal is until it is too late. People lie to get what they want.
Legalising (you know what the subject matter is and I a uncomfortable even typing it) will only result in it becoming a social norm and removing any stigma associated as has happened already with pornography, foul language, and many forms of depravity I wish not to even think of.
To be clear I find such things disgusting myself, but I am not suggesting legalising child molestation, but if some weirdo wants a child doll sex toy that is not actually interfering with a child... or are you suggesting vibrators and dildos should be banned because they promote rape (penetration is rape in most western countries)...
It is like the way I police the rules here... if racism was banned there would be a few members immediately banned... but would that solve racism? Has that helped anybody at all? I understand there are racist people out there and me banning them from speaking is never going to solve the problem.
However if they use their racist views to abuse members then of course I will gladly ban them, but do we solve problems by banning or by talking to people and have those people talk to others. Most of the racist people I know don't know any people of different races and just believe all those stupid stereotypes. Everyone can be racist to a certain degree and of course bigotry is bigger than just skin colour or ethnicity... being anti russian is not racist because russian is not a race just like an anti american or anti brit is not racist either, but of course in the west while you can't say a word against someone who is gay or coloured or transgender or jewish or catholic or muslim or rich... you can say anything you want about the poor or the Russians.
The thing is that in the past minorities were victims of society... today society is the victim of minorities...