It can't. Indian politicians are controlled by the US and UK. Our current Finance Minister is the most mediocre person to have taken over this office. Not even elected. But if you look at her background you'll notice she graduated from a UK based university. Our previous PM, went on to serve 2 terms without getting himself elected. He too is a product of UK university.
Well when the UK implodes then things will become a little easier, but the expansion of the internet in India means they are going to find out the truth so if their own news media wont tell them there will be RT or Aljizz to break it to them...
The current leadership has been handpicked by Trump and Israel and financed by Saudi Arabia.
As progress continues at a snails pace people will notice and start to rise up eventually... or remain where they are forever.
UK works day in, day out along with China to destabilize India.
Hong Kong shows they don't work together at all, and India seems to be destabilising itself all on its own well enough.
Plus Modi paid Putin US$ 1 billion as protection money using flimsy pretexts like developing eastern Russia.
That is an actual investment... when you get a reasonable return on that investment you will realise it was a good idea and do it again and make even more money.... that is how the west works... it finds good things and invests in them and sucks out money from those projects even though they often had very little to do with them except stump up the money to make them happen.... that is how the rich get richer.
If you just put that money in the bank then the peanuts you get in interest you might as well have just spent it.
Well that would require them to somehow sustain peace with the pindos, what would you have them do become fear incarnate?
They just need to expand and grow the number of countries they trade with and make money for both countries so everyone is happy and everyone can continue to develop and grow.
Americas tantrums and sanctions will just make them easier to avoid, because when they go they will likely collapse into bits that could be more interested in fighting each other than anyone else... a bit like the middle east....
There is another problem with this. The us will collapse under the weight of its decadence and uselessness and when this happens it is not atall unlikely that they will fire off thier arsenal in some deluded last ditch effort to prolong the life of thier rotting corpse of a county.
Tell me what is your master plan for this eventuality?
More likely to be a collapse and internal division.... republican and democrat most likely... they will be far more focused on scrabbling for bits... who owns the navy or air force or army... how do we get all our military back and why should be listen to a central power that does not have our interests at heart?
When it is state vs state with little or no unity then Canada can take back some land and so can Mexico and instead of facing the entire US it will only face a state or two. Americans are so interested in personal rights and individuality they will likely forget that it is all of them together that makes them strong including their differences.... they split bigger countries up when they can to make them weaker and their techniques applied in the former soviet union and yugoslavia could be applied domestically today...
There is absolutely nothing mutual about the destruction assured by Russian nuclear superiority, its primary function is to destroy Russia's enemies in the case of a war and its second is to hopefully scare them enough to stay away.
But that is the assurance... attack me and you are dead... no ifs or buts...
And what makes you think that Russia would agree to a disarmament treaty with thoes slime even if they could somehow come up with a fair one? Perhaps if they gave Russia a helpless europe on a silver platter but otherwise such a treaty would only be signed when hell freezes over.
It does not really make sense now anyway with Germany and perhaps Turkey looking to get their own nuclear weapons and of course France and the UK have nukes, why would Russia want an agreement with the US?
And for how much longer? Does your plan include secretly brainwashing the stupidity out of the entire us government?
Nope... the development of more and more powerful nuclear warheads and weapons to deliver them... an ICBM has serious weight limits in terms of warhead capacity... about 10 tons... but Posiedon could be scaled up to carry a 1 Tera ton bomb that is 1,000 tons... send it out to the middle of the Atlantic and boom... we all die.
USSR was dissolved by the Kremlin. Had they not ventured into Afghanistan USSR would have existed even today.
America would like you to think that... but the reality is that 15,000 dead in 10 years is not that big a deal in a 3 million man army... if you include suicides by US military personel who were in Afghanistan I would say they lost rather a lot more over the one and a half decades they have been there.... and they are not in a better position than the Soviets ever were.
The soviets used old gear and relatively old weapons... without the experience they would not be the same force we see today...
They had to go in to Afghanistan because the CIA started moving in in 1965 and would have turned Afghanistan into a Shah rules Iran puppet state...
Or do you believe the western view that it was all part of the aggression... invade Afghanistan and then Pakistan for the purpose of getting a warm water port...
Home
Latest images
Register
Log in
