Coronavirus pandemic 2019-20 #3

higurashihougi wrote:@flaming, kvs:

A number of media and newspapers, especially Western propaganda media, are saying that Sputnik V vaccines delivery is slow and a number of countries is complaining about that lateness.

For example the BBC is showing this picture https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/640/cpsprodpb/177E9/production/_119633269__116134672_gettyimages-1182814974.jpg

Do you have any information about the current status of Russian vaccine production ? I am quite worry about it.

kvs wrote:

The domestic production in Russia is 30 million units as of July 2021.    Sputnik V is licensed for production outside of Russia.

By Rachel Marsden, columnist, political strategist and host of an independently produced French-language program that airs on Sputnik France. Her website can be found at rachelmarsden.com

I went home to visit my mother. Canada tried to force me into a Covid detention facility threatening fines and police action as they don’t recognize my natural immunity. I had no choice but to immediately fly back to Europe.
At the time of writing, I’m at an altitude of exactly 11,277m, 5,230km away from Vancouver, Canada, and 3,159km from my stopover in Munich, Germany, en route back to Paris, France. Where I really should be is relaxing on the backyard patio or in the jacuzzi at my home near Vancouver with a cold drink on a hot summer day. Instead, I’m on a Lufthansa flight heading back to Paris – just a few hours after arriving across the ocean on a 10-hour flight – because my own country’s officials kicked me out. All because I committed the apparent violation of trying to re-enter my own country with proof of naturally acquired Covid-19 antibodies made by my own immune system post-recovery rather than those generated by the manmade Covid-19 vaccine about which much is still to be learned.

Daily life for a Covid-19 survivor with natural immunity from the disease is not for the faint of heart. As someone with a high level of laboratory tested antibodies whose levels have yet to drop even after several months post-illness, my doctor has advised against vaccination. Much is obviously still to be learned about the Covid jabs, still in stage 3 of clinical trials and considered experimental by health authorities – particularly with reports abounding of breakthrough cases of vaccinated people catching and spreading Covid.


To protect and preserve my acquired immunity by opting out of vaccination that risks interfering with it or causing a risk to my health, France now requires me to succumb to nasal swab antigen tests every 48 hours if I wish to continue accessing everyday venues like public transit, gyms, restaurants, some shopping malls, and bars. But it’s a price that I’m willing to pay for my health.

And now I’m paying another price for choosing to protect my own health. I’ve found myself threatened with internment by the Canadian government – something that not even terror suspects or illegal immigrants are subjected to without at least a hearing.

When I attempted to return home from Paris to Vancouver to visit my elderly mother for the first time in a year, I was treated worse than a criminal. I arrived at the airport with a negative PCR test, two positive Covid antibody tests from March and July proving that I still had significant Covid antibodies post-recovery, and a ‘covid immunity certificate’ written and signed by my French doctor to confirm this fact.

The Canadian border officer refused to accept the antibody laboratory test results as proof that I had recovered and was immune from Covid. He wanted a PCR test less than three months ago, after which everyone is expected to take the vaccine. (I didn’t even know that I had Covid until I took a serology antibody test weeks later.) Nor did the officer show any consideration for the negative PCR test taken hours at departure, or for the various other antigen tests – all negative – taken every 48 hours for the prior 10 days. Instead, he ordered me to sign up for a 3-day stay at a government internment facility (to then be followed by a mandatory and monitored 14-day home isolation).

I was then referred to a federal health officer who asked if I had signed up and paid (up to $2,000) for the 3-day government internment. I said no. She said that I had no choice except with respect to which government-contracted facility I’d like to be detained in at my own expense. I asked, “What if I just walk out?” She gestured to the RCMP officer behind her and said that leaving would result in a fine of nearly $6,000. I asked, “Then what if I just stay here in the airport and book a flight back to Paris and cancel my entire visit back home to Canada?” She replied that it would be fine. So, I booked a flight back on my phone at a cost of just over $1,500 – still cheaper than the government internment. She took down my return flight number, wrote me up a federal ‘health order’ that I had to sign, acknowledging that I was to leave Canada on that flight or face criminal penalties up to and including imprisonment. She helpfully added that I could still be fined for my ignorance, but they’d graciously let me off with a warning this time. What a benevolent budding authoritarian regime.

Let’s be clear: The Canadian government, by behaving in this manner, is routinely criminalizing those with Covid antibodies that are not derived from a manufactured experimental vaccine.

Mir wrote:Wait till they start with the booster shots (already started). At least a couple EVERY year.

Cowboy's daughter wrote:
I'm so not taking one.

I read yesterday that England is going to jab 15 and 16 year olds. I don't know if it's going to be mandatory or not.

kvs wrote: GMO "vaccines" do not kill the cells they modify.

higurashihougi wrote:

kvs wrote: GMO "vaccines" do not kill the cells they modify.

Human does not really have the reverse transcriptase like the RNA viruses, and any naked mRNA entered the cytoplasm will be quickly destroyed by the cell enzymes (that's why the cell have to protect her mRNA by a cap and a tail to prolong its ephemeral lifespan).

If gene can be changed that easily then the retrovirus does not need to equip itself a reverse transcriptase to insert her viral gene into the cell genome.

The complete sequencing of the human genome has disclosed the unexpected finding that coding genes account for a mere 1.2% of the total genome, while the remaining portion is constituted by non-coding DNA (International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, 2001). Branded by a historically “bad reputation”, non-coding sequences have been defined as “junk” (Ohno, 1972) or “selfish” (Orgel and Crick, 1980) DNA, a view further strengthened by the evidence that nearly 50% of the human genome is constituted by apparently functionless transposable “genetic parasites” thought to increasingly litter all chromosomes during evolution.

Two main families of transposable elements characterize eukaryotic genomes: DNA transposons, which mobilize through a “cut and paste” mechanism (Muñoz-López and García-Pérez, 2010), and retrotransposons, which mobilize instead through “copy and paste,” a process that requires the reverse transcription of RNA intermediates into cDNA copies as a preliminary step in retrotransposition (Levin and Moran, 2011), promoting the broad expansion of retroelements in eukaryotic genomes.

A key player in this mechanism is the enzyme reverse transcriptase (RT) encoded by LINE-1 retrotransposons themselves. The latter are a source of the RT activity required to promote retrotransposition in human cells (Brouha et al., 2003)

kvs wrote:Back in the early 1970s they thought that there was no such thing as reverse-transcriptase in differentiated human cells. But that theory has been dead for decades.

kvs wrote:How do you think the mRNA "vaccines" from Pfizer and Moderna work?   They are not packaged with reverse-transcriptase or DNA polymerase in the lipid drop vector.

higurashihougi wrote:

kvs wrote:Back in the early 1970s they thought that there was no such thing as reverse-transcriptase in differentiated human cells. But that theory has been dead for decades.

I have seen the link that you give. I will read further about that and other related articles.

kvs wrote:How do you think the mRNA "vaccines" from Pfizer and Moderna work?   They are not packaged with reverse-transcriptase or DNA polymerase in the lipid drop vector.

They will give a temporary protective armour suit to the mRNA, so that it can survive in the cytoplasm for while and assemble the targeted spike protein. Like how the cell give her mRNA a cap and a tail.

The retrovirus need to re-produce both her RNA and proteins, but our target products are spike proteins, not replicons of DNA or RNA, so of course there must be no transcriptases or polymerases added.