tank you, but is ihre (little joke)
also in other topic you say about vidoe. can post vidoe here?
and you read article??
everyting is rotten, everywhere. I pray and pray for this not be true but is there other conclusion now?
Mir wrote:@Gary. It's very easy to use and manipulate statistics to suit your agenda. You should become a spin doctor for Pfizer! They will reward you handsomely! However the statistical method I've used is a very common one and also the standard method of gauging what is going on in the covid world.
Worldometer and even all major health authorities, the media and the governments use the same method and it looks something like this >>
Whilst you at it - take a look at the top 5 countries deaths per million but I guess they should have rather used your method.
Millions of taxpayer dollars were used to essentially torture the puppies to death in labs in and out of the US, according to the organization, which unearthed evidence of the cruelty in the form of over $21 million spent on a total of four experiments – none of which was medically necessary. One involved severing 44 puppies’ vocal cords so that their pained barking and whining wouldn’t bother the scientists; another deliberately infected them with sand flies over the course of 22 months, restricting their movements by locking their heads in boxes so that they could not even swat the insects away as they were being eaten alive.
It’s horrific stuff by any measure, beyond cartoonish levels of evil. Indeed, even Texas Senator Ted Cruz (R) claimed he thought the tweets he’d read about Fauci “literally ‘torturing puppies’” had to be “metaphorical.”
A group of 24 bi-partisan lawmakers are demanding answers from Dr. Anthony Fauci after a nonprofit claims he permitted experimental drug testing on dogs
The White Coat Waste Project alleges that Fauci sent $375,800 to a Tunisian research lab where beagle puppies were force-fed a new drug
The report claims they were also locked in cages with sand flies that ate them alive and underwent a de-barking procedure to keep them quiet
The nonprofit has also revealed three other experiments involving beagles that were allegedly funded by Fauci
The lawmakers have called the experiments 'cruel' and a 'reprehensible misuse of taxpayer funds'
They expect Fauci to answer to the alleged misdeeds by November 19
PapaDragon dislikes this post
kvs likes this post
PapaDragon dislikes this post
kvs likes this post
Cruel' Fauci is condemned for spending $2m on experiments which saw beagles 'de-barked' and trapped in cages so flies could eat them alive. Bi-partisan fury at 'reprehensible misuse of taxpayer funds'
Garryb experimentals vaccines have been doing with pet animals.. exposed Faucci corrupt ethics by his own workers ?
It is important that we adjust for the population size, as about 64% of the entire Scottish population are now fully vaccinated. There are over 3.8 million fully vaccinated people, and just 1.8 million unvaccinated people.
Yet despite only making up 30% of the population, unvaccinated people make up 43% of this weeks new cases.
The vaccinations do reduce your risk of catching the virus, but they do not remove all of the risk. They are not 100% effective, unfortunately. This means that a small share of that 64% of the population will still catch the virus. And as 64% of the population is a lot of people, this number may end up being as high as the total number of unvaccinated people who catch the virus. But that does not mean each group has an equal risk.
For example, imagine Group A has 2,000 people in it, and Group B has 400 people. Then imagine 10% of Group A catch the virus (200 people), and 50% of Group B also catch the virus (200 people). You could say, “As many people in Group A caught the virus as in Group B!!” and you would technically be correct, but it is a very misleading thing to say without mentioning that people in Group B caught the virus at a 5x higher rate.
The above charts are one way of visualizing the data, however another way of visualizing it is in the two charts below, which show the actual numbers and not just the percentage shares. The first chart shows the whole numbers, and the second chart shows the per 100k population numbers.
You can see that proportionally to each groups population size, unvaccinated people are catching the virus at a rate nearly 2x as high as fully vaccinated people are.
What you might be concerned about are the deaths / hospital admissions, and how it looks like fully vaccinated people are dying from the virus at a higher rate than unvaccinated people. There is a good reason why it looks like this, which is what the rest of this page will focus on!
But in short, everyone seems to have a relatively equal chance of catching the virus when exposed. And as being vaccinated reduces your likelihood of catching the virus, this means that in general, an unvaccinated person will be much more likely to catch the virus than a fully vaccinated person.
However, everyone does not have an equal chance of becoming seriously ill and dying from the virus. This varies massively depending on your age and general health status. This is important and something which the above figures do not account for. Especially as just about every single elderly and at-risk person (the people who are mostly still dying from the virus), are now in that fully vaccinated group (my next point!).
So it isn’t just as simple as saying that an unvaccinated person is more likely to die from the virus than a fully vaccinated person. On an individual level, this is true (any one person is much less likely to die from the virus if they get vaccinated). However, a 90 year old person who is fully vaccinated is still going to be at a much higher risk from the virus than an unvaccinated 20 year old (this graphic from the FT shows this well).
Meaning that simply comparing all unvaccinated people to all fully vaccinated people when looking at hospital admissions and deaths is quite tricky to do, as each groups demographics vary so much. Ideally, we could compare unvaccinated elderly people to fully vaccinated elderly people, and unvaccinated young people to fully vaccinated young people. But there is still limited data being released which is broken down by age like this.
Lets follow the science!!
1. Get the vaccine and still get covid
2. Get the vaccine and still spread covid
3. Get the vaccine and maybe join the thousands that have had adverse reactions and some deaths
4. Get the vaccine and get boosters forever for an illness with a less than 1 percent chance of death
5. Get the vaccine and still may die from covid, even when it is around sophisticated people like at say the Emmy awards?
So I roll the dice on the vaccine to reduce my already less than 1 percent chance of death?? Sign me up twice!! Oh wait they do.... make it 5 times!!
Vann7 and kvs like this post
PapaDragon dislikes this post
Mir wrote:@Gary
Well even from previous posts it is quite clear that you're not exactly an animal person
Also it is common knowledge that the vaccines are not effective against the virus - everyone should know that by now.
What is suppressed by most mainstream outlets is the simple fact that most people admitted to hospitals now are the vaccinated.
Lets follow the science!!
1. Get the vaccine and still get covid
2. Get the vaccine and still spread covid
3. Get the vaccine and maybe join the thousands that have had adverse reactions and some deaths
4. Get the vaccine and get boosters forever for an illness with a less than 1 percent chance of death
5. Get the vaccine and still may die from covid, even when it is around sophisticated people like at say the Emmy awards?
So I roll the dice on the vaccine to reduce my already less than 1 percent chance of death?? Sign me up twice!! Oh wait they do.... make it 5 times!!
Vann7 and Mir like this post
PapaDragon dislikes this post
The CDC has approved a fourth Covid-19 vaccine shot for adults with compromised immune systems, allowing for yet another dose amid concerns of waning immunity, as some pharma firms even hint at yearly boosters for all Americans.
Those who are “moderately and severely immunocompromised” may receive a total of four vaccine doses, including an initial two-shot inoculation, one additional dose, followed by yet another booster, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said in an updated guidance on Tuesday.
The immunocompromised were the first to receive authorization for vaccine boosters back in August, with US health agencies subsequently approving additional doses for people in other high-risk categories, such as those aged 65 and older and adults more likely to be exposed to the virus.
However, for the immunocompromised, the CDC classifies a third shot as an “additional dose,” which uses the same amount of vaccine as the previous two, while the fourth jab approved on Tuesday is defined as a “booster” proper. The fourth dose uses only half the volume of the others.
Mir and sundoesntrise like this post
PapaDragon dislikes this post
Mir wrote:The CDC has approved a fourth Covid-19 vaccine shot for adults with compromised immune systems, allowing for yet another dose amid concerns of waning immunity, as some pharma firms even hint at yearly boosters for all Americans.
https://www.rt.com/usa/538543-cdc-fourth-booster-immunocompromised/
Only for Americans? I don't think so!
Those who are “moderately and severely immunocompromised” may receive a total of four vaccine doses, including an initial two-shot inoculation, one additional dose, followed by yet another booster, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said in an updated guidance on Tuesday.
The immunocompromised were the first to receive authorization for vaccine boosters back in August, with US health agencies subsequently approving additional doses for people in other high-risk categories, such as those aged 65 and older and adults more likely to be exposed to the virus.
However, for the immunocompromised, the CDC classifies a third shot as an “additional dose,” which uses the same amount of vaccine as the previous two, while the fourth jab approved on Tuesday is defined as a “booster” proper. The fourth dose uses only half the volume of the others.
Vann7, Mir and sundoesntrise like this post
PapaDragon dislikes this post
Mir wrote:@Gary
The fact that there are people here seriously arguing on the premise that Daddy State, Big Pharma and globalist corpocrats suddenly care about your health and well-being is mindblowing of itself alone.
PapaDragon dislikes this post
Well even from previous posts it is quite clear that you're not exactly an animal person
Also it is common knowledge that the vaccines are not effective against the virus - everyone should know that by now.
So I roll the dice on the vaccine to reduce my already less than 1 percent chance of death?? Sign me up twice!! Oh wait they do.... make it 5 times!!
Could it be that these vaccines are the stepping stone for vaccine passports which will be the stepping stone for a digital ID/ neofeudal cast system?
The fact that there are people here seriously arguing on the premise that Daddy State, Big Pharma and globalist corpocrats suddenly care about your health and well-being is mindblowing of itself alone.
Only for Americans? I don't think so!
Anyone but people without basic intelligence and common sense understand that..
No matter how many top doctors and top scientist you post their discoveries here and findings of how dangerous are the vaccines . You can show him millions of deaths by the vaccine and he still will never accept anything different. he even admit western pharma is very corrupt , but still he believe he can trust their vaccines.
sundoesntrise wrote:Absolute must watch. I follow everything related to this subject so not sure how I missed it. Video is a couple of months old I think
Dr. Michael McDowell on the nature of covid19 and the subsequent vaccine roll out. Both are engineered bioweapons according to him. The initial one ran out of steam fast and the second is much more dangerous as it can be re-applied and seriously messes up your immune system.
His level of knowledge is astounding.
bitchute.com/video/OKz06MpT2BuJ/
EDIT @moderator, is there any way to embed bitchute videos successfully?
kvs and Mir like this post
PapaDragon dislikes this post
sundoesntrise wrote:Absolute must watch. I follow everything related to this subject so not sure how I missed it. Video is a couple of months old I think
Dr. Michael McDowell on the nature of covid19 and the subsequent vaccine roll out. Both are engineered bioweapons according to him. The initial one ran out of steam fast and the second is much more dangerous as it can be re-applied and seriously messes up your immune system.
His level of knowledge is astounding.
bitchute.com/video/OKz06MpT2BuJ/
--
EDIT @moderator, is there any way to embed bitchute videos successfully?
PapaDragon dislikes this post
franco likes this post
sundoesntrise dislikes this post
The A.30 variant of the coronavirus, detected in Angola and Sweden, is highly resistant to antibodies induced by the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines, a new lab study has shown.
A team from Germany looked at the rare A.30 variant that was first recorded in Tanzania and later detected in several patients in Angola and Sweden this spring. They compared the mutation to the Beta and Eta variants. Beta was chosen because it has “the highest level” of resistance to antibodies, the researchers said.
According to the study published in the peer-reviewed journal Cellular & Molecular Immunology this week, the A.30 variant showed improved ability to enter most host cells, including kidney, liver, and lung cells.
The mutation “enters certain cell lines with increased efficiency and evades antibody-mediated neutralization,” the study found.
“In summary, A.30 exhibits a cell line preference not observed for other viral variants and efficiently evades neutralization by antibodies elicited by ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 [AstraZeneca] or BNT162b2 [Pfizer] vaccination.”
The variant also proved to be resistant to monoclonal drug Bamlanivimab, which is used for Covid-19 treatment, but was vulnerable to a cocktail of Bamlanivimab and Etesevimab.
A.30 has so far not been listed by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a variant of interest or concern, due to its low prevalence.
kvs likes this post
Yet some more evidence that the ineffective jabs will create even more serious problems the further we go down this rabbit hole.
Mir likes this post
Phoebe S • an hour ago
"...data that included input from independent advisory committee experts..."
They weren't happy with the last independent advisory committee so they must have selected one that would 'independently' advise what they were told to.
@Barabas • an hour ago
“The panel’s decision was based on data presented by Pfizer…”
Very honorable panel.
reply...
@lodi45 --> Barabas • 31 minutes ago
Just like (corrupt) cops investigating themselves and finding nothing wrong.
the benefits of the vaccine outweigh the risks ”
kvs and Mir like this post
Mir likes this post
Mir likes this post