Airbornewolf wrote:
The work of Russian MLRS in Kakhovka
Impressive !
Airbornewolf wrote:
The work of Russian MLRS in Kakhovka
Arkanghelsk and Urluber like this post
Hannibal Barca, Airbornewolf, Big_Gazza, kvs, zepia, JohninMK, littlerabbit and like this post
Airbornewolf, Big_Gazza, kvs, JohninMK, LMFS, Hole, Broski and Krepost like this post
Orlan wrote:flamming_python wrote:Finty wrote:Problems with the way you train coming home to roost when its time to fight?
For a military that understands how to use offensive support its Armoured forces don't seem to appreciate the need for dispersion.
This is now a high value target.
Not an isolated example at all.
https://twitter.com/EliLea1/status/1497369230588596227
Can the basement dwelling virgins here that suck off Putin so much defend these tactics? They don't seem great.
The Russians tend to know where the enemy arty is. They're also in a built up area and even the Ukrainian military will think about targeting them here.
So far I haven't seen any Russian columns taken out by artillery. Maybe 1. Otherwise the ones taken out were ambushed
VDV column from videos today was destroyed by MLRS apparently.
Finty likes this post
Finty wrote:Problems with the way you train coming home to roost when its time to fight?
For a military that understands how to use offensive support its Armoured forces don't seem to appreciate the need for dispersion.
This is now a high value target.
Not an isolated example at all.
https://twitter.com/EliLea1/status/1497369230588596227
Can the basement dwelling virgins here that suck off Putin so much defend these tactics? They don't seem great.
Big_Gazza, kvs and Mir like this post
BREAKING: Kosovo asks the US for a permanent military base and requests NATO membership
Would be like ANA lmfaoFinty wrote:#BREAKING: EU countries will provide #Ukraine with 'fighter jets' under Brussels funding, says
@JosepBorrellF
.
https://twitter.com/AmichaiStein1/status/1498030112230592512
We can give them some of our Tornado GR4s... joke.
Big_Gazza, Hole, Mir, Broski, Arkanghelsk, Urluber and billybatts91 like this post
Arkanghelsk wrote:Finty wrote:Problems with the way you train coming home to roost when its time to fight?
For a military that understands how to use offensive support its Armoured forces don't seem to appreciate the need for dispersion.
This is now a high value target.
Not an isolated example at all.
https://twitter.com/EliLea1/status/1497369230588596227
Can the basement dwelling virgins here that suck off Putin so much defend these tactics? They don't seem great.
They're very good little britain couldnt face the taliban lmfao
flamming_python wrote:
Kharkov - contested. Russian Spetsnaz is in town, and Russian forces have entered from 8-9 different directions. I don't think there is a huge rush to sweep it though. Lots of Ukrainian military in the city, a column of Russian Tigrs and light infantry vehicles was already destroyed. Absolute priority is to avoid any destruction or civilian casualties. Hence no artillery support. It's just infantry advances.
Apparently there is a considerable amount of local support in Kharkov for the Russian invasion, lots of people are waiting for the Russians to arrive and sweep out the Ukrainian hold-outs and nationalists garrisoned in the city.
Chernigov - held by Ukrainians, and surrounding villages have stopped Russian forces from passing through. There's one where a bunch of villagers stop a Russian T-90A column and tell them to turn around and leave. Which the Russian tankers do in the end. Then the villagers celebrate by shouting 'Glory to Ukraine!'. Another vid where villagers take over a Russian T-72B3, think it got abandoned. It's a mess. Chernigov is central Ukraine, it's more anti-Russian than the south and east provinces.
Nikoalev - held by Ukrainians but half-way to being encircled by now. There's a considerable amount of local defense, and civilians taking up arms against Russia. Best to avoid it.
Finty wrote:Arkanghelsk wrote:Finty wrote:Problems with the way you train coming home to roost when its time to fight?
For a military that understands how to use offensive support its Armoured forces don't seem to appreciate the need for dispersion.
This is now a high value target.
Not an isolated example at all.
https://twitter.com/EliLea1/status/1497369230588596227
Can the basement dwelling virgins here that suck off Putin so much defend these tactics? They don't seem great.
They're very good little britain couldnt face the taliban lmfao
Russia has lost more men in four days than we lost there in 20 years...
Finty wrote:Arkanghelsk wrote:Finty wrote:Problems with the way you train coming home to roost when its time to fight?
For a military that understands how to use offensive support its Armoured forces don't seem to appreciate the need for dispersion.
This is now a high value target.
Not an isolated example at all.
https://twitter.com/EliLea1/status/1497369230588596227
Can the basement dwelling virgins here that suck off Putin so much defend these tactics? They don't seem great.
They're very good little britain couldnt face the taliban lmfao
Russia has lost more men in four days than we lost there in 20 years...
Big_Gazza, kvs, Hole and Urluber like this post
Werewolf wrote:Backman wrote:This was a day ago. The Ruble gained most of its losses back. It will react again from the swift bs. But it will just float back up again. Russia is a dual creditor nation. Its gravity
Russian special military operation in Ukraine #2 - Page 38 2022-02-25_05-09-00
I am so happy I bought some crypto Ruble. This is easy money for one grand in Euros.
Big_Gazza, Azi and Arkanghelsk like this post
miketheterrible likes this post
Arkanghelsk wrote:
No they havent that's bullshit your posting from twitter
Kia are around 300 men
Your army couldnt dream of doing this op
You got bucked by taliban lmfao
Odin of Ossetia dislikes this post
d_taddei2, Big_Gazza and miketheterrible like this post
d_taddei2 wrote:Borrell is crazy to think that they can supply Ukraine with combat aircraft, unless it's Su-25, Su-24, Su-27, Mig-29. And as far as I am aware not my EU countries have any of these aircraft. Maybe polish mig-29. Because u cant just hand over any aircraft and expect a pilot to be able to fly a F-16 for example. Not to mention do they have any airport in good condition to be able to fly the aircraft, and how will they get aircraft into Ukraine? They will be bombed by road, shipping them is a no go, and NATO won't let their pilots fly into Ukraine airspace with aircraft especially combat aircraft.
Updates
1) EU Intends to Supply to Ukraine Combat Aircraft as Part of Military Assistance - Borrell
2) Talks Between Kiev & Moscow Will Be Held on Monday Morning in Belarus' Gomel Region, Ukrainians Travel Through Poland For Security Reasons - Source
3) Three Bayraktar Drones Shot Down, Ukrainian S-300 Complex Destroyed During Sunday Ops: Russian MoD
Russia began a military operation to "demilitarise and denazify" Ukraine on Thursday after a formal request for assistance from the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics coping with unceasing Ukrainian attacks. On Friday, President Putin called on Ukraine's armed forces to rise up and seize power from the country's current authorities.
Three Turkish-sourced Ukrainian Bayraktar TB-2 strike drones were shot down in the suburbs of Chernigov, and an S-300 air defence complex was rendered inoperable in the area of the city of Kramatorsk during Russia's ongoing military operation in Ukraine, Defence Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov said Sunday.
Six other air defence systems, including Buk M1 and Osa missile systems, as well as 56 radar stations, were also destroyed during Sunday's operations, Konashenkov said.
Some 1,067 objects of Ukrainian military infrastructure have been destroyed during the operation to date, including 254 tanks and other armoured vehicles, 31 grounded aircraft, 46 heavy multiple launch rocket artillery systems, and 103 artillery guns and mortars, the MoD spokesman said.
Russian troops have suffered casualties, including dead and wounded, Konashenkov said. These are "many times" below those of among Ukrainian nationalist formations, and those of the regular Ukrainian army, he said. The spokesman did not elaborate on specific casualty figures, however.
According to the MoD, Donetsk People's Republic forces have advanced six kilometers, freeing the settlements of Nizhneye, Granitnoe and Gnutovo, while Lugansk People's Republic forces pushed forward four kilometers with Russian fire support.
d_taddei2, Big_Gazza and Broski like this post
flamming_python wrote:Finty wrote:Problems with the way you train coming home to roost when its time to fight?
For a military that understands how to use offensive support its Armoured forces don't seem to appreciate the need for dispersion.
This is now a high value target.
Not an isolated example at all.
https://twitter.com/EliLea1/status/1497369230588596227
Can the basement dwelling virgins here that suck off Putin so much defend these tactics? They don't seem great.
The Russians tend to know where the enemy arty is. They're also in a built up area and even the Ukrainian military will think about targeting them here.
So far I haven't seen any Russian columns taken out by artillery. Maybe 1. Otherwise the ones taken out were ambushed
Arkanghelsk wrote:Finty your right amateurs talk tactics warriors talk logistics
At least the russians arent being airlifted out of Bagram while the taliban provide security
That's why bojo is no Winston churchill, you'll be reading about russian army while yours sits in england for a good while
Arkanghelsk wrote:Finty your right amateurs talk tactics warriors talk logistics
At least the russians arent being airlifted out of Bagram while the taliban provide security
That's why bojo is no Winston churchill, you'll be reading about russian army while yours sits in england for a good while
VDV beasts held horomel through the night against UAF, your guys sat and watch taliban establish FOB around your whole base
Big_Gazza likes this post
Finty wrote:Arkanghelsk wrote:Finty wrote:Problems with the way you train coming home to roost when its time to fight?
For a military that understands how to use offensive support its Armoured forces don't seem to appreciate the need for dispersion.
This is now a high value target.
Not an isolated example at all.
Can the basement dwelling virgins here that suck off Putin so much defend these tactics? They don't seem great.
They're very good little britain couldnt face the taliban lmfao
Russia has lost more men in four days than we lost there in 20 years...
Hannibal Barca, Big_Gazza, miketheterrible, Mir and Broski like this post
Finty wrote:Further developments, klitchko has claimed he didn't tell AP that Kyiv was encircled.
Also this
BREAKING: Kosovo asks the US for a permanent military base and requests NATO membership
Big_Gazza, miketheterrible, Hole, Mir, Broski and Urluber like this post
Odin of Ossetia wrote:
I think more frequently by the drone attacks rather than by ambushes on the ground.
Those drones need to be eliminated very soon.
Finty wrote:Arkanghelsk wrote:Finty your right amateurs talk tactics warriors talk logistics
At least the russians arent being airlifted out of Bagram while the taliban provide security
That's why bojo is no Winston churchill, you'll be reading about russian army while yours sits in england for a good while
I won't defend our country's involvement in Afghanistan, it was a waste of time, money and most importantly, lives.
Big_Gazza likes this post