Russian special military operation in Ukraine #24

Cyrus the great wrote:I understand that there is an economic dimension to this war and that mobilisation would only put unnecessary strains on the Russian economy... but why can't Russia deploy at least 300k troops?

Cyrus the great wrote:I understand that there is an economic dimension to this war and that mobilisation would only put unnecessary strains on the Russian economy... but why can't Russia deploy at least 300k troops?

ALAMO wrote:A full set of newly delivered modernized BMP-2M with Berezok turrets.

It is some fresh cossack unit.

Firebird wrote:The plan will be to split the Ukraine in 3 or so.
Novorossiya will inc Dnipropetrovsk, Nikolaev, Kharkov, Zap, Kherson, Odessa, Donetsk, Lugansk etc. This could all be reabsorbed into Russia pretty quicky.
Malorossiya will centre around Kiev.
Rump Pukraine will be around 5 oblasts in the West.



The bullshit reported in Ameri-fag/Euro-fag media hasnt changed a single thing.

ucmvulcan wrote:

Firebird wrote:The plan will be to split the Ukraine in 3 or so.
Novorossiya will inc Dnipropetrovsk, Nikolaev, Kharkov, Zap, Kherson, Odessa, Donetsk, Lugansk etc. This could all be reabsorbed into Russia pretty quicky.
Malorossiya will centre around Kiev.
Rump Pukraine will be around 5 oblasts in the West.



The bullshit reported in Ameri-fag/Euro-fag media hasnt changed a single thing.

As much as I would really love to see Russian seizure of Ukraine up to the borders that existed from 1919-1939, I really don't see it happening.  It's not what Putin wants, but again no complaints if it did happen.

Arkanghelsk wrote:

ucmvulcan wrote:

As much as I would really love to see Russian seizure of Ukraine up to the borders that existed from 1919-1939, I really don't see it happening. It's not what Putin wants, but again no complaints if it did happen.

And how is demilitarization/denazification/ neutrality maintained with 4 raions/oblasts?

You cannot maintain it with only Lughansk Donetsk Zaporizhia, and Kherson

makes no sense, and this is pretty much disregarded after Kharkov

Russia , in order to fulfill those very goals set by statesman , must occupy Ukraine , or at the very least take the leadership out and force the collapse of Ukraine

Flooding the Ingulets and having some tactical defensive victories does not fulfill objectives of SMO

Whatever those may be, and if they really want denazification and demilitarization,

Well they must send more troops in to the regions like Kharkov and such

ALAMO wrote:




Inspector General of the Bundeswehr, Eberhard Zorn, quoted by Focus, claimed that there are no signs of any Ukro "counteroffensive".

The actions they have made are good enough to fight and reclaim a village rather than push the Russian army away.

Oh my oh my, who would consider such zrada

By the way, the guy holds the highest position in the german armed forces, there is no higher rank.

Cyrus the great wrote:I understand that there is an economic dimension to this war and that mobilisation would only put unnecessary strains on the Russian economy... but why can't Russia deploy at least 300k troops?

ucmvulcan wrote:

Firebird wrote:The the West.



The bullshit reported in Ameri-fag/Euro-fag media hasnt changed a single thing.

As much as I would really love to see Russian seizure of Ukraine up to the borders that existed from 1919-1939, I really don't see it happening.  It's not what Putin wants, but again no complaints if it did happen.

Backman wrote:[
There's no way 300,000 troops (calling up 220,000 more troops) is going to damage the economy.

ALAMO wrote:

Inspector General of the Bundeswehr, Eberhard Zorn, quoted by Focus, claimed that there are no signs of any Ukro "counteroffensive".

The actions they have made are good enough to fight and reclaim a village rather than push the Russian army away.

Oh my oh my, who would consider such zrada

By the way, the guy holds the highest position in the german armed forces, there is no higher rank.

ALAMO wrote:Naaah, this guy is serious.
A long lasting & rich career. A pro.

Mir wrote:

ArgentinaGuard wrote:
Pinochet was a patriot. Of course he deserves respect. Except for the communism of his country.

Pinochet was a brutal Nazi dictator - period. He murdered, tortured, persecuted, sexually abused and made a lot of people disappear - all against his own people that did not quite like his brutal oppressive ways. Yes very nice patriot he was - just like Stalin and Hitler.

Btw Stalin was not a Communist - he was a Stalinist. It was either his way or no way. Even Lenin thought Stalin was not a good idea.

Guess what - Argentinians suffered the very same fate from their own military dictator during the 70's and 80's, but I am 100% sure you support this kind of shit.

ArgentinaGuard wrote:

Mir wrote:

ArgentinaGuard wrote:
Pinochet was a patriot. Of course he deserves respect. Except for the communism of his country.

Pinochet was a brutal Nazi dictator - period. He murdered, tortured, persecuted, sexually abused and made a lot of people disappear - all against his own people that did not quite like his brutal oppressive ways. Yes very nice patriot he was - just like Stalin and Hitler.

Btw Stalin was not a Communist - he was a Stalinist. It was either his way or no way. Even Lenin thought Stalin was not a good idea.

Guess what - Argentinians suffered the very same fate from their own military dictator during the 70's and 80's, but I am 100% sure you support this kind of shit.

Pinochet was not a Nazi, ignorant. He was a neoliberal.
And Stalin was stubborn. I appeal to nationalism when Germany was on the brink of Moscow. And after killing millions of ethnic Russians (when he was a Georgian) All wrong.
Stalin is a communist, as was Lenin and all the Jews who ended the Russian Empire.

Ask Chileans what they think of Pinochet. They have just ratified their constitution despite the efforts of the communist Boric.
Brutal methods against terrorists and reds lol. It makes me tender that you say it.
And you think that Russian opponents and enemies of the state have been treated well? The pro-Western journalists who have been eliminated by the services. It seems very good to me.
You have to defend the nation, everything goes.

Mir wrote:

ArgentinaGuard wrote:
Pinochet was a patriot. Of course he deserves respect. Except for the communism of his country.

Holy shit you are dumb.

I know someone, directly face to face, who suffered under Pinochet.  A Chilean who was a socialist. He was a university student at the time. Ended up in prison when he told his goons that he was a proud socialist that applied for schooling in Leningrad.  He was thrown in jail then exiled.

Don't talk about events you neither understand. By sounds of it, you don't understand much