caveat emptor Tue Jan 17, 2023 2:40 am
Interesting thoughts by Sladkov on building up specialized PMC. It is something to be careful with, but Wagner turned out to be bullseye. Especially, since the start of the war.
It provides an alternative way for people with military background to pursue a career in the field.
I wonder how much Wagner's success in Ukraine is connected to Ru army inability to fight omnipresent and overwhelming bureaucracy?
https://t.me/Sladkov_plus/7041
RUSSIAN MINISTRY OF DEFENSE AND PRIVATE MILITARY COMPANIES: PROSPECTS FOR COOPERATION.
The idea of the possible creation and introduction of new PMCs into the Ministry of Defense invigorated the information space. And I see both "yes" and "no" here.
“No”, because a private company cannot be in the structure of a public institution. And yes, because PMCs can closely cooperate with the military department on outsourcing.
If we are talking about the work of PMCs commissioned by the Ministry of Defense, why should we immediately talk about attack aircraft? Yes, our civilian builders are afraid to build a second line of defense, because missiles fly there, and civilian contractors sometimes die in whole teams.
Let's organize an engineering and fortification PMC, let specially trained and armed specialists professionally create strongholds under enemy fire. Difficult, dangerous, necessary and honorable.
Create intelligence PMCs affiliated with the Ministry of Defense (including RER), tuning of weapons, robotics and UAVs, adaptation and tailoring of equipment for various individual units, delivery, transportation and evacuation from the front line, medical PMCs.
But all this must be done in the presence of such full-time specialized units in the Ministry of Defense itself, at least for competition. Let civilians be engaged in the preparation and use of specialists of various profiles. Maybe they'll do better.
Here, what is more reliable for whom: an oath or a contract.