franco wrote:
It sucks but that is the reality... Putin said 10:1 plus during the counteroffensive so far but 20-30,000 Ukrainians losses equals 2-3,000 Russians losses.
Indeed.
franco wrote:
It sucks but that is the reality... Putin said 10:1 plus during the counteroffensive so far but 20-30,000 Ukrainians losses equals 2-3,000 Russians losses.
GarryB likes this post
Looks more like the work of some moles.Consequences of a missile attack
Is this a foldable roof protection device?T 80 BVM
All those places are meatgrinders for the Ukros. Staromayonnaise is under full fire control by russian troops.Orekhov, Rabotino, Staromayorskoe
Still playing nice. The difference is likely much higher.Putin said 10:1
GarryB, Big_Gazza, Mir and Broski like this post
GarryB, franco, d_taddei2, Big_Gazza, kvs, PapaDragon, JohninMK and like this post
franco wrote:flamming_python wrote:One should not fall under the impression that there are no losses on the Russian side though with the materials published here.
The enemy is advancing in considerable numbers and intense fighting has been observed in Orekhov, Rabotino, Staromayorskoe and neighbouring sectors to Bakhmut. In addition to the terror attacks on Moscow and Taganrog there have also been strikes of Russian ammo storages in the Donbass at a minimum.
There are enough materials on Nazi resources such as various Reddits as well as YouTube channels such as The Sun and others.
However such materials will rarely show anything other than a battle for a single trench or the ambush of a lone vehicle. Whereas the Russian videos show entire columns and formations of Ukrainian forces engaged and destroyed.
It sucks but that is the reality... Putin said 10:1 plus during the counteroffensive so far but 20-30,000 Ukrainians losses equals 2-3,000 Russians losses.
GarryB, xeno, d_taddei2, kvs, PapaDragon, zardof, Sprut-B and like this post
T-47 wrote:So is there gonna be another mobilization or is it just internet as usual?
GarryB and jon_deluxe like this post
GarryB, AMCXXL, Mir and jon_deluxe like this post
GarryB, franco, xeno, PapaDragon, Hole and jon_deluxe like this post
GarryB, Big_Gazza, kvs, PapaDragon, GunshipDemocracy, Sprut-B, Eugenio Argentina and like this post
GarryB, d_taddei2, kvs, PapaDragon, Sprut-B, AMCXXL, LMFS and like this post
flamming_python wrote:
I suspect there will be one this year
Right now there are just some legal shuffles relating to it, and the need is not great - unless they mean to relieve earlier mobilized soldiers - but I doubt Putin wants to announce a mobilization next year when elections are already looming. Makes more sense for them to announce a call up say this autumn.
GunshipDemocracy wrote:flamming_python wrote:
I suspect there will be one this year
Right now there are just some legal shuffles relating to it, and the need is not great - unless they mean to relieve earlier mobilized soldiers - but I doubt Putin wants to announce a mobilization next year when elections are already looming. Makes more sense for them to announce a call up say this autumn.
so all those volunteers ( they said ~1500 a day +) is not enough?
GunshipDemocracy and Broski like this post
GunshipDemocracy likes this post
GunshipDemocracy wrote:so all those volunteers ( they said ~1500 a day +) is not enough?
franco, GunshipDemocracy and Broski like this post
flamming_python wrote:
Maybe they want to hedge against the possibility of engaging NATO. As Putin said Russia is prepared to do if neccessary
Either way, there have been some legal changes prepared for mobilization or are being prepared. So they're at least open to the possibility of enacting mobilization again.
sepheronx wrote:Something like 150K or so are sitting on western border with 150K in Ukraine. So why another? Are they expecting possibly Poland to actually attempt?
jon_deluxe and ucmvulcan like this post
PapaDragon dislikes this post
Arkanghelsk wrote:Mobilization is indeed coming, and the reason is that the MIC is producing so many things that there are enough equipment to go around for another army of 300,000 and even more
That reserve would take more than 3 months to train, as it would be a non-combat experience pool that will be drafted
You cannot send them into combat until maybe 6 to 9 months or even a year of training
But what you can do, is free up the forces which are sitting in reserve and have been training for many months
Also the men in Zaporozhye have to be rotated, there are many reports of guys literally having fought through the Ukro banzai for long without rotation
So that is also the case, and lastly, polls are showing this war needs to be wrapped up
While economic damage was inflicted, it's clear neither side will capitulate and have enough resources to continue the current state of affairs without it worsening drastically for any side
It's time to end it, at the same time, the military realizes they cannot keep things in this general state, the average soldier wants this to end, and people in Russia want their brothers, fathers, uncles back, Russia is not some orc country where people are born to die in forever war
People want an end , and that's why Wagner rebelled, and that's why Shoigu is in North Korea
An end must be written to this story, and it must be written that Russia won this war against the evils of Kiev and the West, further suspense will just not do, and there's no certainty Moscow will survive it, or that the military might conduct a coup at some point in the future - uncertainty already led to one shitshow which was negotiated
No more 5d chess, people demand results
GarryB, flamming_python, GunshipDemocracy, Broski and jon_deluxe like this post
ucmvulcan wrote:
I believe most of this, but how does Russia end this war soon? I mean without the shit the west so very much deserves but that would render most of the northern hemisphere uninhabitable.
owais.usmani and ucmvulcan like this post
PapaDragon dislikes this post
The biggest issue with those drones is that they are extremely hard to spot.
Best way to deal with them is shotguns... you know the ones seen in movies where they shoot at plates in the air. They need to give at least one light shot gun per squad or group of soldiers working togather.
But one thing is sure, they change the battlefield and you can't have 0 losses when you face them. They can easily destroy multimillion dollar equipement.
Tanks need drone-specific APS. A localized detection system would be more effective than SAM radar units. A drone in the immediate
vicinity of a tank is a large target. The problem is how to keep this APS from triggering from the motion of other objects (e.g. driving
by a branch). They need to track the EM from a drone instead of using radar. This is easier in the localized context since the drone
EM signal is weak.
It not hard to harden a drone against shotguns.
They have a very small range. Dones like Lancelet are very easy fortify against this, the quad copters are a bit harder but possible. 20mm with airburst ammo is much better.
EW gun and a shot-gun
to fight against drones.
The story is clear: Storm Shadow accuracy sucks a**.
I believe most of this, but how does Russia end this war soon? I mean without the shit the west so very much deserves but that would render most of the northern hemisphere uninhabitable.
Hole and jon_deluxe like this post
Arkanghelsk wrote:Mobilization is indeed coming, and the reason is that the MIC is producing so many things that there are enough equipment to go around for another army of 300,000 and even more
That reserve would take more than 3 months to train, as it would be a non-combat experience pool that will be drafted
You cannot send them into combat until maybe 6 to 9 months or even a year of training
But what you can do, is free up the forces which are sitting in reserve and have been training for many months
Also the men in Zaporozhye have to be rotated, there are many reports of guys literally having fought through the Ukro banzai for long without rotation
So that is also the case, and lastly, polls are showing this war needs to be wrapped up
While economic damage was inflicted, it's clear neither side will capitulate and have enough resources to continue the current state of affairs without it worsening drastically for any side
It's time to end it, at the same time, the military realizes they cannot keep things in this general state, the average soldier wants this to end, and people in Russia want their brothers, fathers, uncles back, Russia is not some orc country where people are born to die in forever war
People want an end , and that's why Wagner rebelled, and that's why Shoigu is in North Korea
An end must be written to this story, and it must be written that Russia won this war against the evils of Kiev and the West, further suspense will just not do, and there's no certainty Moscow will survive it, or that the military might conduct a coup at some point in the future - uncertainty already led to one shitshow which was negotiated
No more 5d chess, people demand results
GarryB, d_taddei2, Airbornewolf, PapaDragon, GunshipDemocracy, LMFS, Hole and like this post
GarryB, Werewolf, d_taddei2, par far, GunshipDemocracy, Sprut-B, Hole and like this post
flamming_python wrote:
Well people wanted this whole to end from the beginning but most are smart enough to realize that their desire alone is not enough
You have to carry this thing through to its conclusion else you'll just get another war later on and people realize that too
So latent support for the operation carries on as it did, and will do until the conditions for a victory and then permanent peace have been met. All other scenarios won't do.
mnztr wrote:I guess it comes down to the ammo supply that defines what kind of offensive/defensive ops russia can sustain. I am beginning to wonder if russias ammo supply is not as plentiful as we hoped. Not dire by any means, but not enough to open a new front from belarus for example. Esp knowing they had to provision for a major defensive campaign. I think bakhmut demonstrated that an any gaps in ammo supply result in much higher casualties. So russia will not start a major push until there are sufficient
GarryB, psg, d_taddei2, Big_Gazza, PapaDragon, GunshipDemocracy, Sprut-B and like this post
flamming_python wrote:mnztr wrote:I guess it comes down to the ammo supply that defines what kind of offensive/defensive ops russia can sustain. I am beginning to wonder if russias ammo supply is not as plentiful as we hoped. Not dire by any means, but not enough to open a new front from belarus for example. Esp knowing they had to provision for a major defensive campaign. I think bakhmut demonstrated that an any gaps in ammo supply result in much higher casualties. So russia will not start a major push until there are sufficient
No reason to think that Russia's ammo supply is anything other than plentiful.
If Russia can rush T-90Ms off the conveyor, then it has no problems doing the same with shells
JohninMK wrote:Interestingly different way of counting losses, dead Sim cards. A problem is that it is difficult to discount the Sim cards lost to the Ukie network (one of several) due to emigration, particularly eastwards (westwards would tend to keep the Sims active with roaming). What do you think? My highlight.
flamming_python, Sprut-B, LMFS, Hole, Mir and Broski like this post
If russia can build geraniums then so can Ukraine. So other risk will pop up.
kvs, GunshipDemocracy and Hole like this post