As it seems you are the next on the menu.
Russian special military operation in Ukraine #60
ALAMO- Posts : 7529
Points : 7619
Join date : 2014-11-25
As it seems you are the next on the menu.
PapaDragon- Posts : 13479
Points : 13519
Join date : 2015-04-26
Location : Fort Evil, Serbia
ALAMO wrote:You should.
As it seems you are the next on the menu.
We already been on the menu
History didn't start in 2014
TMA1 and Broski like this post
Isos- Posts : 11605
Points : 11573
Join date : 2015-11-06
Belisarius wrote:
Like Pokemons, They evolved from suicide drone operators to suicide drones.
GarryB, kvs, TMA1, Mir and Broski like this post
kvs- Posts : 15876
Points : 16011
Join date : 2014-09-11
Location : Turdope's Kanada
franco wrote:Russian MoD reporting 2480 Ukrainian casualties over the past 24 hours including...
Trending to 3000 per day and higher.
GarryB, Big_Gazza, zardof, LMFS, Hole, Mir and Broski like this post
ALAMO- Posts : 7529
Points : 7619
Join date : 2014-11-25
Sujoy wrote:
While it's true that Western labour costs are higher, economies of scale and specialization can offset these costs. Large-scale production facilities in the US are now leveraging automation, standardized processes, and bulk material purchases to reduce overall unit costs. Specializing in specific weapon components is leading to greater efficiency and lower production costs.
The weapons manufacturing process in the US has been almost entirely automated. Manufacturing techniques like 3D printing/additive manufacturing is now reducing production time and costs especially for complex components.
Perhaps an area of concern for them is the regular supply of critical raw materials because most of it comes from China.
That is a fantastic joke - allow me to repeat that with my friends, please.
Big_Gazza likes this post
GarryB- Posts : 40576
Points : 41078
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
Perhaps that's why they are investing in weapons like QUICKSINK which will probably be used to compel the adversary to empty their SAMs before they can launch their long range more expensive missiles like the AGM-158C LRASM
The Russians were already increasing their ready to fire number of air defence missiles and have done from Soviet times... the SA-4 (two missiles) was replaced by SA-6 (3 missiles ready to fire), which was replaced by SA-11 and SA-17 (four missiles ready to fire) now being replaced by Viking with 6 to 12 missiles ready to fire... every system increasing in effective range performance of the missiles... at short range the SA-9 had four missiles ready to fire, SA-13 has 6 ready to fire, Tunguska had 4 and then 8 missiles ready to fire, Tunguska now has 12... OSA had 6 missiles ready to fire and the original TOR had 8 and now 16... S-300 had four per launcher but S-350 has 12 and up to 48 with the tiny 9M100 missiles fitted, while S-350 missiles can replace the S-400 missiles four to one, so the original four tube launcher truck can carry 16 S-350 missiles ready to fire.
Now they have drones to deal with and they are adding heavy calibre guns with airburst and guided shells and also lasers and are developing new cheap minimissiles... but more than that they are developing heavy missiles that deliver mini missiles to a place where lots of targets are like the R-33/37 AAMs they were talking about with multiple missiles as payload so launching one 300km range missile towards a group of targets enable multiple targets to be engaged when the large missile arrives and releases mini missiles to engage multiple separate individual targets.
Ironically western air defences can't even deal with cruise missiles or supersonic threats and they are pushing Russia to the next level of drone swarms... Russia is ready for the challenge... but the west is getting further and further behind.
China already has a very impressive aircraft production. They have reportedly already produced over 200 to 300 J 20, which is an impressive number. But how much truth is there in that?
Their potential is enormous if they think they need it... look at their ship production...
Making cheap drones on its own could overwhelm any western force very quickly... they are not even equipped to deal with a few drones yet...
While it's true that Western labour costs are higher, economies of scale and specialization can offset these costs.
The west does not make all the components, so most electric motors and batteries will need to be imported... from China.
More importantly look at the costs of western artillery shells... they were about 2K euros and when they put them back into mass production (which they haven't really yet) the price quadrupled to 8K euros per shell... Western governments are going have to invest trillions into their arms industries but even when they do they wont get bargains. 750 billion to bail out US banks and not a cent was paid back... no relief for loans or debts for the customers who paid for that 750 billion bailout... It just all disappears into pockets and bank accounts never to be seen again.
Large-scale production facilities in the US are now leveraging automation, standardized processes, and bulk material purchases to reduce overall unit costs.
Squandering extra money on robots only makes sense when labour costs are too high.... except labour costs were never the problem... greedy CEOs in collusion with Pentagon officials controlling contracts were the problem... hoping to get cushy well paid jobs in the private sector when they retired...
The weapons manufacturing process in the US has been almost entirely automated. Manufacturing techniques like 3D printing/additive manufacturing is now reducing production time and costs especially for complex components.
And the price of everything continues to go up and materials have to be imported because they don't make them in the US any more.
The US aircraft industry... civil and military rely on Russian metals to make their basic products...
The USA will enforce Ukrainian people to pay that debt. Like other nations that have been too unlucky to fell under control of puppet governments installed by USA "color revolutions".
And any such state would just default and declare bankruptcy.
Or just join the Russian Federation or Poland and say what stuff are you talking about... I never signed anything...
If it isn't in writing then it never happened... isn't that what the west said about not a single step east for HATO?
According to this source the rumored "secret talks" between Russia and Ukraine was a deal to "stop strikes on energy infrastructures" from both sides.
But it was being talked about before the Kursk encursion and that led to Putin saying no more negotiations... so Kiev threatening to strike Kursk NPP has ended any chance of such a deal.
Normally it will take over natural resources, of which there are many in Ukraine. They have already taken over their fields, etc.
And if it becomes Russian Federation land, how do they prove ownership?
Why would Russia reward the companies that are driving this war and killing Russians and Ukrainians alike?
The same old-fashioned way.
Stealing gold reserves.
Deducting liabilities.
The problem here is that the west has ploughed billions into this adventure... possibly trillions, and I don't think Russia will be willing to play ball this time around.
I rather suspect a core reason why Kiev do desperately wanted those regions back was the fact that there are a lot of resources in that territory they were likely hoping to sell or had already sold. Otherwise you would think it was not worth taking on Russia to get those hostile regions back.
They clearly didn't want the people.
I bet the guys who got the jobs of flying drones to kill the enemy couldn't believe their luck... well now it seems even their luck is running out.
Post about the French arresting a guy moved to the off topic thread here
Big_Gazza, kvs, Rodion_Romanovic, MMBR, Eugenio Argentina, Hole, lancelot and Broski like this post
Regular- Posts : 3894
Points : 3868
Join date : 2013-03-10
Location : Ukrolovestan
kvs wrote:franco wrote:Russian MoD reporting 2480 Ukrainian casualties over the past 24 hours including...
Trending to 3000 per day and higher.
I am learning to subtract any statements by 10 when listening to officials. I know I am not their intended audience, but they are starting to piss me off, honestly.
Let’s look at this realistically and comparing WW2 casualties in Kursk front (as example)
Nazis had almost 1 million troops in Kursk. Well supplier and manned.
Their daily losses were roughly 3000 KIA/WIA.
Battle of Kursk lasted for 49 days (Citadel and Soviet counter) and buckbroke nazis.
Scale is not the same here and this war is fought by small units due to various limitations (self-imposed for Russia, reality - for Ukrainians)
The Ukrainian MOD's claim of 1,200 Russian KIAs daily is insanely exaggerated, with actual figures closer to +-120 with few mass casualty events in between.
This level of attrition would imply the loss size of three battalions daily, which is unrealistic given the current scale of engagements. Unrealistic knowing how hard is to actually for Ukrainians to restaff and grinding Russian assaults with small fire teams instead of big arrow, division sized breakthroughs.
Current hot battles are mostly around Kursk and Pokrovsk. Ukrainian units in these areas are already eroded and giving ground (Ukrainian brigades there identified and tracked same those in Kursk) and such high losses would likely lead to a rapid collapse of their lines, not the steady attrition being reported.
It’s up to you what to believe, but the figures seem more aligned with propaganda than with the actual battlefield situation. It’s just another day at the front.
LMFS- Posts : 5169
Points : 5165
Join date : 2018-03-03
Regular wrote:
Let’s look at this realistically and comparing WW2 casualties in Kursk front (as example)
Nazis had almost 1 million troops in Kursk. Well supplier and manned.
Their daily losses were roughly 3000 KIA/WIA.
Battle of Kursk lasted for 49 days (Citadel and Soviet counter) and buckbroke nazis.
Scale is not the same here and this war is fought by small units due to various limitations (self-imposed for Russia, reality - for Ukrainians)
According to Russians, Nazis had ca. half million casualties in Kursk, calculated over that period of time that results in almost 10k per day. Indeed the scale is different, but we talk here about the whole front, with the ukie incursion in Kursk just making numbers peak from less than 2k per day to almost 2,5k currently. I see no big reason to doubt those numbers, other than assuming that MoD cannot account for every actual casualty.
xeno, kvs, zardof, The-thing-next-door, Mir, Broski and Belisarius like this post
JohninMK- Posts : 15669
Points : 15810
Join date : 2015-06-16
Location : England
xeno, Big_Gazza, kvs, zardof, LMFS, Hole, Mir and like this post
Big_Gazza- Posts : 4915
Points : 4905
Join date : 2014-08-25
Location : Melbourne, Australia
franco, psg, xeno, kvs, zardof, LMFS, Hole and like this post
kvs- Posts : 15876
Points : 16011
Join date : 2014-09-11
Location : Turdope's Kanada
Where are the numbers for the Ukr force density compared to the Nazis during WWII? Without this information fobbing off the official loss numbers is
absurd. You mean divide and not subtract. So according to you, the Ukrs are losing only 250 men per day. That is delusionally low.
Hole and Mir like this post
franco- Posts : 7059
Points : 7085
Join date : 2010-08-18
Summary of the Russian Ministry of Defense on the progress of repelling the attempted invasion of the Armed Forces of Ukraine into the territory of the Russian Federation (as of August 25, 2024)
The Armed Forces continue to repel the attempted invasion of the Armed Forces of Ukraine into the territory of the Russian Federation.
Units of the North group of forces, with the support of army aviation and artillery fire, repelled attacks by enemy assault groups in the direction of the settlements of Komarovka, Malaya Loknya, Nechaev and Cherkassk Porechnoye.
Attempts of attacks in the direction of the settlements of Vishnevka, Borki, Pogrebki and Sleeping were also thwarted. As a result, the Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 40 people killed and wounded, destroyed a tank, 4 armored combat vehicles and two cars.
Reconnaissance and search operations are continuing to identify and destroy enemy sabotage groups in the forests that tried to penetrate deep into Russian territory.
Air strikes, artillery fire and military actions defeated concentrations of manpower and equipment of the 22nd and 61st mechanized, 80th and 82nd airborne assault brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as well as the 1st brigade of the National Guard and the 1004th brigade of protection in the areas of the settlements of Vishnevka, Gordeevka, Ivashkovsky, Krasnooktyabrsky, Kruglenkoe, Lyubimovka, Mikhaylovka, Novaya Sorochina, Plekhovo, Rubanshchina and Snagost.
Tactical air strikes were carried out in the Sumy region on the areas of concentration of personnel and military equipment of the reserves of the 22nd, 41st, 54th, 61st and 115th mechanized, 80th and 82nd airborne assault, 92nd assault brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, 1st brigades of the National Guard, as well as the 101st and 103rd theroboron brigades in the areas of the settlements of Belopolye, Belovody, Vorozhba, Druzhba, Katerinovka, Obody, Pervomaiske, Pershetravnevoe, Peremoga, Svessa, Sumy, Pogroedy, Yunakovka and Yastrebinoe.
During the day, the losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine amounted to more than 300 military personnel and 14 armored vehicles, including a tank, an infantry fighting vehicle, an armored personnel carrier, 11 armored combat vehicles, 7 vehicles, an artillery piece, one unit of engineering equipment, two electronic warfare stations, as well as an air target detection radar ST-68.
In total, during the fighting in the Kursk direction, the enemy lost more than 5,800 soldiers, 72 tanks, 31 infantry fighting vehicles, 58 armored personnel carriers, 383 armored combat vehicles, 177 vehicles, 37 artillery pieces, five anti-aircraft missile systems, 11 multiple launch rocket launchers, including three HIMARS MLRS and one MLRS, 9 electronic warfare stations, counter-battery radar, air defense radar, five units of engineering equipment, including two engineering barrier vehicles and one UR-77 mine clearance unit.
The operation to destroy the AFU formations continues.
d_taddei2, kvs, zardof, LMFS, Hole and Mir like this post
Hole- Posts : 11132
Points : 11110
Join date : 2018-03-24
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
The debt will be the reason why the west keeps sanctions against Russia.The same old-fashioned way.
Stealing gold reserves.
Deducting liabilities.
They will claim that Russia has to pay for it because Russia took over regions of the fake country formerly known als Ukraine.
franco, kvs, Rodion_Romanovic, The-thing-next-door, Eugenio Argentina, lancelot, Mir and like this post
Broski- Posts : 772
Points : 770
Join date : 2021-07-12
Good. Sanctions have forced Russia to become self sufficient and has a growing middle class because of it. Hopefully the gas Russia sells to Europe gets completely rerouted to Asia at some point so the EU can turn into White Africa, but without the resources Africa has.Hole wrote:The debt will be the reason why the west keeps sanctions against Russia.The same old-fashioned way.
Stealing gold reserves.
Deducting liabilities.
They will claim that Russia has to pay for it because Russia took over regions of the fake country formerly known als Ukraine.
sepheronx, psg, Big_Gazza, kvs, PapaDragon, Rodion_Romanovic, zardof and like this post
Rodion_Romanovic- Posts : 2658
Points : 2827
Join date : 2015-12-30
Location : Merkelland
Maybe,but wars do not work like that.Hole wrote:
The debt will be the reason why the west keeps sanctions against Russia.
They will claim that Russia has to pay for it because Russia took over regions of the fake country formerly known als Ukraine.
They did bet on the losing side and the money is lost.
If they want to complain they can protest with their boss (the US and those criminals in the EU commissione) that forced them in a no win situation.
kvs, The-thing-next-door, Kiko and Broski like this post
Hole- Posts : 11132
Points : 11110
Join date : 2018-03-24
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
Good.
Sure, Russia won´t care.They did bet on the losing side and the money is lost.
Only problem is that they will go after smaller countries Russia is trading with.
But that will be an incentive for those countries to join organisations like BRICS and the SCO.
kvs likes this post
JohninMK- Posts : 15669
Points : 15810
Join date : 2015-06-16
Location : England
Big_Gazza, kvs, zardof, Hole, Mir, Broski and Belisarius like this post
ALAMO- Posts : 7529
Points : 7619
Join date : 2014-11-25
JohninMK wrote:Could it be a Challenger?
No.
JohninMK- Posts : 15669
Points : 15810
Join date : 2015-06-16
Location : England
The Ukrainian channel "Resident" on the importance of the attack on the Kursk region for the image of the Kiev regime:
Our source in the General Staff reported that the AFU is unable to break through the enemy's defenses in Korenyovo, which is why Syrskyi is transferring new units to the Kursk region from Zaporozhye, Odessa, and Volyn regions. The list of brigades and units will be expanded, and the AFU contingent will be increased to 40,000 soldiers.
It is worth noting that the AFU's losses in the Kursk region have already exceeded 5,800 people.
http://T.me/ukraine_watch
franco, d_taddei2, LMFS, lancelot, Mir and Broski like this post
JohninMK- Posts : 15669
Points : 15810
Join date : 2015-06-16
Location : England
Pity. Abrams?ALAMO wrote:
No.
PhSt- Posts : 1494
Points : 1500
Join date : 2019-04-02
Location : Canada
War correspondents were able to determine the possible location of NATO F-16s in Ukraine. If true, Russia shouldn't waste time and strike this airbase somewhere in the Ivano-Frankovsk region. However, its also possible that this is a controlled leak and that the F-16s are operating from NATO bases in Romania. If proven true, and if Ukraine did launch attacks against Russia from NATO bases, these bases need to be taken out ASAP.
zardof, The-thing-next-door and ucmvulcan like this post
Big_Gazza- Posts : 4915
Points : 4905
Join date : 2014-08-25
Location : Melbourne, Australia
GarryB, franco, kvs, PapaDragon, LMFS, Hole and Mir like this post
ucmvulcan- Posts : 1374
Points : 1372
Join date : 2022-02-26
PhSt wrote:
War correspondents were able to determine the possible location of NATO F-16s in Ukraine. If true, Russia shouldn't waste time and strike this airbase somewhere in the Ivano-Frankovsk region. However, its also possible that this is a controlled leak and that the F-16s are operating from NATO bases in Romania. If proven true, and if Ukraine did launch attacks against Russia from NATO bases, these bases need to be taken out ASAP.
If it is Ivano Frankovsk, wipe it out with conventional ordinance. If its Romania, Airman Ivanov and Airman Smirnov at aviation ordinance need to accidently load a couple nuclear tipped rockets to their piliots' Su 34s. NATO arming Ukes is plausible deniability. NATO launching attacks? That is direct involvement and they to be made permanently neutral
GarryB, zardof and The-thing-next-door like this post
ALAMO- Posts : 7529
Points : 7619
Join date : 2014-11-25
JohninMK wrote:
Pity. Abrams?
Edit :
I have watched that again, and it looks like I was wrong.
It is probably Challenger 2, but the case is that the picture is mirrored.
That fooled me
Challenger is quite easy to identify because it has a big box of laser rangefinder above the gun on the frontal part, and a wide cover of gunner's sight left to it if we are seeing the tank head on.
Here we can see both, but on the wrong side...
It suggests that the picture was mirrored.
GarryB, PapaDragon, JohninMK, Mir, Broski and Belisarius like this post
Mir- Posts : 3837
Points : 3835
Join date : 2021-06-10
JohninMK wrote:Pity. Abrams?ALAMO wrote:
No.
Some of these tanks are so heavily modified with all the add-ons, but the barrel is too long for the Abrahams.
I think it may well be a Challenger but it's hard to tell.
GarryB and JohninMK like this post