The thing is slightly more complicated and rooted in Germany's constitution
Either way it is good they are driving the blade deeper and deeper and twisting the blade to cause maximum damage... the tiny thing they are ignoring is that the blade is in their own stomach and not in Russias chest...
They wanted to hurt Russia and are instead destroying themselves... continue by all means...
Sending Taurus won't change anything anyway. Besides, even the entire potential of Western cruise missiles wouldn't be able to hypothetically significantly damage Russian industry and economy. Especially since many of these missiles wouldn't reach the target.
I understand you mean to say that Taurus wont save Kiev or change anything on the battlefield because Russian Air Defences can stop most Taurus attacks, but sending Taurus missiles will make Russia change tactics and escalate dramatically and make HATO a party to the war which is a massive escalation that is going to really make things worse for the West.... which is clearly what Kiev wants... they are running out of bodies and want some HATO bodies on the front line instead.
The brake up of the coalition should safe the FDP so that they can keep enough votes to get into the next parliament after the upcoming vote.
But currently they are under the 5% hurdle so it propably came to late. Without the FDP the division of the seats will change and parties like
AfD or BSW will likely get more deputies. This will make the formation of a new coalition more difficult.
The stupid policies and decisions made by stupid German politicians are leading to parties like VW and BMW to relocate to US territory... and I can't see Germans being very good in the service industry as help desk operators...
Putin was talking about referendums in other areas. Perhaps he hopes if talks can be had, he can get more of ukraine without fighting.
He doesn't need more territory to fix, but if the populations are anti Kiev by now offering them their own neutral state could be a good option in terms of making the rest a weak and non-threatening neighbour.
Putin doesn't require more land... if that was the goal then that is the way they would have fought this conflict... by taking land...
Putin knows it is about the people and not the land, the two minsk agreements and the istanbul agreement which Russia signed let Kiev have all the regions back except Crimea. It was only referendums in the four regions after the istanbul agreement collapsed that led them to ask to join the RF and be accepted by the RF as Russian territory that things changed. If other regions decide to join the RF Russia is not obliged to accept them, but I am sure they would take seriously any request.
for me for this to count as a very good russian victory, they must seize odessa, Kharkiv, Sumy, Myko, Cheriniv and Poltava. They won't get a round two for these.
They never expected to get the Crimea back... all of this is gravy.
If they can't agree on anything the fighting will continue and when the Ukrainian military collapses they can hold referendums and let the people decide what sort of future they want.
The US is sick of funding a corrupt failed state.... if you can call HATO a state... the US is also sick of funding a corrupt failed state called Kiev and the EU is incapable of meeting its own needs let alone the corrupt failed Kiev state on its own.
Trump might do something stupid like pump more money and weapons and ammo into Kiev and then try to negotiate saying if you don't give us a bone we will double what we have done (a bluff of course), or he might just say this is none of Americas business and just cut and leave and let the EU sort it out because the US has to solve the middle east and China taiwan situations as a much more important priority.
Putin is not desperate for an out and knows taking a little more pain but doing it right is the right thing to do.
Exactly. Any agreement without cutting Ukraine off from the sea is a defeat for Russia. Agreements will be signed. Putin believes in agreements and papers and in a year NATO will stand in Odessa.
The front line is unlikely to collapse that far fast enough, so what you want is no agreement and a continuation of the conflict.
It all depends on what Trump does and how cold it gets this winter and if Zelensky does something stupid.
if you let these territories go to NATO then you have partly failed
If HATO tries to seduce any of the neutral states that will be grounds for Russian forces to attack and eliminate those bad influences...
So many people here, particularly caveat and seig getting things so wrong.
A natural result of the power of western propaganda... Putin is the new hitler and he wants living space and resources in the west because his country lacks resources and energy... Putin invades countries all the time and topples regimes he doesn't like so he and his cronies can continue to steal from those countries their energy and other resources... replace Putin with the US and it is totally correct.
Oh I know and the loss of these areas would be what i warned about over a year ago, take to long and your window will close.
No. It is the opposite. Russian forces are advancing and Kievs forces are being pushed back... the longer this goes on the more territory the Russian forces will occupy and their goals are to recover RF territory and then to add a buffer zone to protect RF territory from Kiev attack. If the people in these buffer zones want to have a referendum then of course they have that right but their options wont include joining the EU or HATO, they will include being neutral or subservient to Kiev, or to join the RF if they wish. The RF might accept offers to join the RF or might reject them.
fact is Putin has negotiated after the war started a few times, what you are doing is ignoring context and using a blanket remark.
Putin has never offered to give away Russian territory... now four new regions are now Russian territory any new agreement will require Ukraine forces to remove themselves from those four regions and of course any remaining in Kursk too.
Part of the demilitarisation and denazification will likely involve Russia handing to Kiev a list of names of people to be handed over for trial, and almost certainly a referendum and new elections in Ukraine so they can talk to leaders who have the mandate of the people to negotiate for them.
Zelensky has no mandate and failed the mandate that got him elected where he promised to talk and solve the situation peacefully.
Apparently Ukraine has longer range MLRS systems than himars and tornado-s
It is Smerch rockets packaged to look like HIMARS... work it out for yourself... a HIMARS based rocket would be 227mm calibre like HIMARS and M270 MLRS rockets. This rocket is a 300mm rocket like Smerch...
@Garry: some netizen raised questions that whether Russia should apply the AA gun shells that use the computer programmed fuse like German Gepard to counter UAVs.
Well the main problem is that you need to mass produce them in enormous numbers and have the AA guns located everywhere a UAV might appear with the right ammo loaded and ready to go. Quite often you will be sitting there for days or weeks or months and nothing... then one night at 3am you hear a buzz and for about 30 seconds a drone flys over. Now you have to ask... is it yours or theirs?
Air burst ammo is the best ammo for dealing with drones but having guns located at the known targets the UAVs will be targeting is another matter.
Over time as airburst shells become mass produced and deployed then the job will get easier... even a BMP can carry air burst 30mm cannon shells and BTRs could be fitted with 23mm cannons with airburst shells too... laser range finding and optical target tracking gives precise distance and range information... a quick calculation for lead and fire the round and track the round and the target till they get very very close and send a command for your shell to detonate and that should do the job every time.
Using timed fuses makes them horribly expensive and even if they work perfectly if the target turns or speeds up or slows down between the shot being fired and the interception then you are likely to miss. A round that is command detonated would be more effective and much much cheaper and simpler... all the expensive stuff would be reused over and over and the disposable stuff that is destroyed with every use... ie the shell, can be much cheaper and therefore mass produced in enormous numbers and also used on all sorts of targets. An airburst round is useful for all sorts of things... detonating rounds over enemy troops or trenches or above a helicopter hovering behind a building or tree leads to fragments showering down on the troops or helicopter from above. Front concealment or cover rendered useless.