Talking bollocks thread #3

lyle6 wrote:Nani? Suezo Dorifto?

Betting on a Filipino helmsman screwing up behind the wheel, probably listening to Eurobeats while he's at it.

thegopnik wrote:https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2021-03-23/musk-says-spacex-to-land-starship-rockets-on-mars-well-before-2030#:~:text=Musk%20Says%20SpaceX%20to%20Land%20Starship%20Rockets%20on%20Mars%20Well%20Before%202030,-By%20Reuters%2C%20Wire&text=March%2023%2C%202021-,By%20Reuters%2C%20Wire%20Service%20Content%20March%2023,2021%2C%20at%205%3A14%20a.m.&text=(Reuters)%20%2D%20Elon%20Musk%27s%20SpaceX,in%20a%20tweet%20on%20Tuesday.

elconquistador wrote:

lyle6 wrote:Nani? Suezo Dorifto?

Betting on a Filipino helmsman screwing up behind the wheel, probably listening to Eurobeats while he's at it.

No, not a Filipino..

Maximmmm wrote:

elconquistador wrote:

lyle6 wrote:Nani? Suezo Dorifto?

Betting on a Filipino helmsman screwing up behind the wheel, probably listening to Eurobeats while he's at it.

No, not a Filipino..

Could be weeks that it's stuck there apparently. Cool teaching case for geopolitics though. You always hear people nowadays say "land, why do people even need more land"? Well, because sometimes things that happen on that land can have massive effects on the entire planet.

GarryB wrote:

Seriously I think the Iranian regime is evil, based on how it treats its people, but the saber rattling approach is just pointless.

I find it hilarious that westerners judge Iran as evil... the number of living people made dead in that region because of the actions of a government would be an interesting list and I suspect Iran would be no where near the top of that list... and more ironically the moral and ethical and judgemental western powers that identify other leaders as killers and this or that regime as being evil are head and shoulders at the top of that list.

Look at the death penalty in the US, or Guantanimo Bay concentration camp... if you are poor you die...

GarryB wrote:

Yes I judge them as evil based on how they treat their own people.

But what is the actual treatment you find to be evil... Considering in Canada you can be arrested for child abuse calling your son male terms when she has decided she identifies as female. I don't think many things are evil, but your country supported the US to kill millions of people in the Middle East and elsewhere while calling anyone who died a terrorist or collateral damage... shoot first and fix any problems with cash payments to survivors... being an athiest I don't really think in terms of good and evil... but if I was to start calling governments evil... like I have said western people should not throw stones.

The USA does do some evil things for sure, as does even Canada and all the western countries and China, but I would live in most of those countries, NO WAY would I live in Iran. Maybe visit but thats it.

So pillage and murder around the world, along with blackmail and theft, has paid off so much you forgive the west their crimes, yet think of Iran as evil.

Interesting.

Question is, what is a reasonable fleet of bombers for Russias needs? They have about 60 TU-95, plan to build up to 50 TU-160, 60 TU-22 and how many PAK-DAs? As its stands they have a pretty staggering fleet. If they are gonna build a lot of PAK-DA plus the AAM capability, does this signal a major change in operational docterine for heavy units?

The problem is that the 15 Blackjacks they currently have is not really a viable force so when they make another 50 or so they can form operational units from those aircraft. The Tu-22Ms don't come in to it because they are theatre strike only and have no strategic purpose.

The purpose of the PAK DA is to form a mixed fleet of supersonic very long range cruise missile and missile carriers (Tu-160 only) and subsonic long range fuel efficient and cheaper to operate bomb and missile carriers that can carry large outsized loads internally with lots of fuel and inflight refuelling for strategic missions with long range and hypersonic long range missiles, or shorter ranged missions with much much heavier conventional loads.

Essentially the Tu-160 is expanded to become the primary anti US strategic cruise missile carrier force, while the PAK DA will replace the Tu-95 in the subsonic strategic role, but extra PAK DAs could be built for other missions like inflight refuelling support of the strategic attack PAK DA... the inflight refuelling versions could carry Zircon missiles and AAMs as well as lots of fuel so as they head over the north pole with the cruise missile armed PAK DAs, they could launch Zircons at AEGIS cruisers in the Arctic Ocean looking for ballistic missile warheads to shoot down, plus long range AAMs to engage any long range cruise missiles or enemy fighter aircraft in the air.

As I said the Tu-160 and PAKDA will replace the Bears and Backfires in their current roles, but that frees these aircraft that are new and up to date for other missions.

New missiles are entering service which would be ideal for the Bears and Backfires to keep them potent and useful... the new Grom, a 1,500km range mach 6 defence penetration missile is one example, while the Kh-50 subsonic stealthy 1,500km range missile is interesting too.

In the short term the Tu-22M3 and Tu-95 that are made redundant as new Blackjacks and PAK DAs are produced could be used as inflight refuelling aircraft, or shorter ranged strike platforms.

The Tu-22M3 operating from Syrian airfields would be much more effective at dropping very heavy loads on insurgent forces without burning a lot of fuel in the process.

Bears based in Syria could carry a wide range of anti ship and anti sub weapons... if the US can base B-1Bs in Norway then Russia could base Bears and Backfires in Cuba or Venezuela, while keeping their actual strategic cruise missile carrying force within the boundaries and safety of Russia and the Russian IADS.

miketheterrible wrote:You are too retarded to know quality of life in Russia.

BTW, Russia has a larger birth rate than most western world. Gotta be that poor quality of life, eh? I guess Japan's quality of life is bad too.

In Russia, you don't go bankrupt for medical. In US, you do every fucking time.  But hey, they are viewed as growing population and best on earth. But their quality of life is shit

You see, your narrative falls apart pretty easy.  You are an example of our absolute shit tier education system.

Our Soros funded, multi colored sock, retarded monkey as a PM couldn't even match Putin in a butt wipe competition.  We don't deserve a Putin cause we are too busy shipping in terrorists from all over the world, while good hard working people from other countries can't get in because of quota bullshit.  We give billions in foreign aid yet our poverty rate is climbing drastically along the hardest - child poverty.

So go get fucked.  You are a useless twat and an example of how stupid Canadians can be.

You neither have experience nor any quality of opinion that matters.

miketheterrible wrote:Ah, I see you have the anecdotal evidence meme.  Proves you are a retard

OK, so Russia is second to USA in terms of immigration.  Which is above Canada.

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/03/which-countries-have-the-most-immigrants-51048ff1f9/

You were the retard talking about improving living standards for demographics to increase. I pointed out your false narrative of pointing out low birth rates vs high quality of life.

Fuck you are retarded.  Your GF should find a better man, one who isnt a fucking moron.

I have been to Russia and have family there BTW. So get fucked.  You never went and the whole "my gf is from Moscow" doesn't fly.  That argument is one of the worst I have ever read and is usually used as a meme.  Like the "my uncle who works at Nintendo"

JohninMK wrote:Can I respectfully suggest that you two tone it down or delete a few comments before Garry gives you holidays?

kvs wrote:https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/RUS/russia/fertility-rate

compare:

https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/ESP/spain/fertility-rate

https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/ESP/france/fertility-rate

https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/ESP/germany/fertility-rate


Russia has a higher TFR than the "rich" EU countries.

Russian girlfriends are not a source of information.   The ones that push west tend to be pro-west and anti-Russian.

 

miketheterrible wrote:Nah, I just have a problem with losers who lie and rely on things like "my Russian gf says" nonsense. You know, I rely on facts to which I provided while conveniently, you provided none other than what your GF says.  We don't even know if you have a GF. But if she is real, she must have low standards.

Loser

https://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/138620/

But this ain't the topic. So mods can do as they please. I'm done.