Before I am accused of editing quotes or something, I will declare now, Garry, that I have cut down portions of the quotes that I have replied to in this post, because I received an error saying the message was too long.
Actually, I even tried cutting down the quotes to reduce word count but it still wasn't enough, so I am just going to split the post in two.
Shock... horror... what do you think they were planning to do?
I know what their plans are, I did research, read original interviews with shipyard directors, USC directors, manufacturers, I know what the current state and plans of Russian civil and military shipbuilding are, and now I have informed you. You are welcome.
Russia and the Soviet Union have always paid for some products to be made by overseas shipyards... the floating dry dock that was lost with problems than they are currently having.
Kirov? Sweden? That dock was manufactured in Finland, and was used for Adm. Kuz. And now instead of having to make it yourself or order from abroad, the RuNavy instead decided to make a new drydock for repair and even manufacture of vessels up to and even above the size of Adm Kuz.
Because the Russian Navy, and civil shipbuilders as a whole don't think it is exactly acceptable to rely on foreign yards for VITAL repair facilities for the Russian Navy, and perhaps Russia shouldn't be an importer of ships and maritime equipment, but manufacture their own, and export it.
And they said that because they read it in an article... they didn't read it in the tea leaves, but instead of calmly suggesting their inform if we look at what you wrote:
Oh it wasn't that, it was Hole, Alamo, Papadragon claiming that Russia had taken either 2nd or 3rd place for civil shipbuilding, and specifically used the word "overtaken" Japan, they provided no such source or article.
And yeah, I wrote what I wrote, when someone makes an absurd claim, and claiming Russia had overtaken SK or Japan in civil shipbuilding is an absurd claim, I'm not going to exactly put velvet gloves on. Anyone one with a basic 10 minutes worth of searching on the internet would completely understand that the claim by this "article" you mention is outright absurd.
So you were saying they were wrong without even seeing the numbers for yourself.
I knew exactly what the situation with Russian civil shipbuilding was even before the claim was made, I can read Russian, I can got to Flotprom.ru or balancers.ru and read exactly what is going on in not just civil but military shipbuilding as well.
So yeah, someone claiming that Russia overtook SK/Japan is not just an eyebrow raiser, but equivalent to saying they had a quite the bridge to sell me.
Yeah... but it has to be done now or yesterday or I can't brag about it on the internet...
Changes to a shipbuilding industry don't happen overnight or even in a couple of months, they are working on the problems as they can, but how could they possibly be any better... not being shipbuilders of any standing at all... Rolling Eyes
I most certainly am not bragging about anything on the internet, and I know perfectly well what changes take in terms of time, I see it happening before my eyes.
he Russian government isn't funding and supporting shipyards so they can be the worlds best.... they are funding them and er ships is a pathetic waste of capacity for them if what they need are river boats and fishing boats and oil tankers and gas carriers and ice breakers.
You need to start reading what I actually wrote instead of responding to the strawman you have constructed in your head.
Pathetic waste of capacity or not, capability is compared with capability, not need or want. Can Russia build the same level of vessels that SK can? No. End of story, South Korea has a better shipbuilding industry, end of discussion.
Nobody gives a **** about the South Korean production level... Russia isn't keeping tabs on Thales of France to check to see how many the night vision optics... it does not matter... you have clearly spent too much time around Americans.
LOL
Again, it wasn't me that compared Russia to SK/Japan, Hole/Alamo/PapaDragon did so by claiming Russia overtook them.
You kind of have to give a **** about the production level, it is what a comparison involves, taking both sides and seeing the various metrics.
So what is it with all the butt hurt from you?
My butthurt is imagined in your head, you think I lose sleep over this?
So let them complete the orders they have... let some foreign shipyards take up the slack and get some upgrades and development done so they are better able to make ships... are you really this dumb?
Really? How am I dumb? I demanded nothing from Russian shipbuilders whatsoever, I described correctly their current and future situation and the problems they have, problems don't go away if you don't talk about them.
It is precisely what they are doing.
Post number 114 in this thread:
And? I said total tonnage output is the figure that matters, am I wrong? You want to take output of shipyards it is pretty much the best way of doing it.
Do you know what total deadweight means? It is actual mass of the vessel without fuel or cargo, so when you make either river vessels or supertankers, you can see raw amount of metal actually being processed into hull sections and created into a vessel.
Primary work of shipyards is to cut and shape metal, and install components such as engines, shafts, propellors, electronics, pretty much everything that makes a ship not just a hunk of metal that looks like a ship.
So yes Garry, tonnage is in indeed the benchmark to measure by, but not the only one. There are more, another two main metrics can be gross tons, which adjusts tonnage of a vessel by it's cost, you can think of it as comparing housing by cost per square meter.
Gross tons are useful because something like a cruise ship costs 40x more than a bulk cargo carrier twice it's displacement, they require vastly higher labour hours to install and furnish all the systems and amenities that make a cruise ship a cruise ship, they are unbelievably expensive, I believe the most expensive in the civilian shipbuilding world actually.
There is also total orderbook, this is simply the sum of the payments received for all the contracts you have received for constructing all vessels.
So Garry, I would like you to explain to how how you felt that I was contradicting myself or flip flopping? I am quite clear with my comparisons, I didn't flip flop anywhere, I actually compared Russia with all three metrics, with Asia and Europe, do you need me to pull up the posts?
Yeah, the entire navy section is full of projects that were delivered early and under budget and everyone claimed the Russian shipbuilding industry is ahead of the curve... you are the first to mention their might be any problems with managing very large complex pr
Why do you think the third world remains the third world... and why do you think there is such panic in the west over the growth of China... tom that trickle down, but now it all goes to the 1% and most Americans are getting screwed like everyone else... should be interesting to see how long that will last...
Somehow, China, SK, and Japan succeeded in becoming the world premier shipbuilders, despite not being nonwhite or Western, and against incredible odds to.
I really doubt Russian shipbuilding is so hopeless as you describe that they couldn't export advanced value added products, there is all of Africa, South America, Middle East, Asia, I feel as if you are simply preparing for failure.
Of course the world is free and fair and lets let quality of product and market forces control everything... which is why Sputnik V which seems tasy to get and of course all that ammo they produce...
How naive are you?
All you talk about is Western markets, meanwhile the other 7 billion people of the world are all accepting, and have accepted Russian products when there is reason to do so.
Mexico bought Sukhoi SSJ's for god's sake. The reasoning here is simply Garry, if you have a good product and a will to sell it, you can find success. The West is not omnipotent, strong, but not omnipotent.
Well I suppose having to operate at depths in the arctic ocean they would need much higher quality steels or titaniums than deep diving submarines...
A statement that could have been only made by someone who understood nothing about the subject.
You think constructing advanced nuclear submarines suddenly makes construction of large sea going vessels a matter of flicking a switch?
You want an example of how naïve you are? Zvezda requires a new foundry in order to produce ultra large steel sheets in order to build ships quickly with large amount of labour efficiency, should I go and tell them that they have Sevmash in their home country, and now all their problems are solved?
And then the contradiction... are you saying large container ships were not possible to build before these countries adopted their new method of ship building using large cranes?
Hard to believe.
What contradiction? No, you don't need Goliath class cranes and modular construction yards, it just makes immensely easier, quicker, faster, and cheaper to do so.
Without these methods, these ships wouldn't have been impossible, but vastly more expensive and laborious to produce.
Hilarious... now you care about Russian customers getting the ships they want on time... which is obvious because without that factor there is no problem... they can just wait longer and shipyards can continue to build them the old ways.
Of course I care, why wouldn't I? I don't have ultra low standards for them.
You have no problem with customers waiting? I can assure you customers do, or will the Soviet-built fleet go on forever?
Those new trawlers that Scorpius posted a picture of, should Russians wait for them to be built to acquire their own seafood, or be beholden to foreign suppliers?
You are pretty much not caring about Russian food security here lmao, all to defend slow construction methods.
Problem solved then.
It's a temporary solution until Russian yards increase capacity.
Ordering Russian parts instead of foreign parts would save needing foreign currencies and exchange rates and the Russian components will likely be rather cheaper too.
And if they don't exist or aren't cheaper or as good of quality?
Wow... sounds like they could have some impressive tonnage figures on their books shortly... they might even overtake fiji in the ship building stakes..
Oh so now you like big ships now? No longer interested in river transporters.
Not really my problem... I am sure they are doing what needs to be done... and if there are problems or delays there are likely very good reasons for that too.
Garry's infinite patience and understanding shining through.
But anyone can make river boats... teach a 10 year old to whittle and pretty soon he will be making river boats... making river boats does not make you a shipbuilder remember...
Again, more strawmanning, where did I say river boats aren't ships, or making them doesn't count as shipbuilding?
hat is right... I forgot he is your bitch and has to do everything you say when you say it... or not.
Or he might have read you complaining that Russian shipyards can't make ships and he posted some photos of ships they have made recently... what a total unfeeling bastard, what was he thinking... What a Face
LMFAO
He literally responded to my post asking for METRICS on Russian shipbuilding and how it COMPARED to South Korea or Japan, when I was calling bullshit on posters claims that Russia overtook them.
He pasted paragraphs of various statistics, and not ONE of them mentioned Japan or South Korea, just a few sums and plans for construction period through 2024.
His attempt to prove that Russian shipyard exceeded SK or Japan literally did not include one comparison or figure/metric from SK or Japan.
It's like saying one lifter lifted a higher amount of weight than another, and then only posting one lifters records. It's just absurd.
It's even funnier when I went through the statistics he posted them and compared them to Japanese ones, they outright disproved his own point.
In magic land someone pops up and says... OK guys you have spent the last decade or two not doing too much and trying to keep afloat but now we have to ship oil and gas and we have stuff that has to go by ship as well so despite the fact that there has been no time to prepare h
I
Ty shipyards die, those that continue are terribly inefficient no matter what methods they use because they don't have enough customers.
Ok and? What does car manufacturing, pollution levels, or how countries go through transition phases?
Russian shipyards are in a unhealthy state, normal or not normal, this is the truth. No need to write massive paragraphs over it.
Well obviously they need to sort out their funding structure because otherwise they are just pissing money away to the banks... and why should they benefit more from Russia building ships than the shipyards that make the boats.
They do a good job of pissing away money as well, don't rob them of their own personal agency, RuNavy and government aren't exactly angels towards them, but there is plenty of blame on them for their situation, corruption being a big one.
Bullshit. They need zero interest loans like western banks get from each other and then they can work their way out of debt... they ng in the Russian north sea route will need to be built in Russia... having and have Russian equipment and fittings to ensure they will be safe in the arctic conditions... safety first.
They are getting direct government assistance, as to government rules, they literally have a keel quota program, it is how those trawlers that Scorpius posted pictures of actually got built. Russian customers don't live in the USSR, they have freedom of choice, without that program those trawlers would have been very unlikely to be built in Russia.
As for the rule about only Russian ships in NSR, it would simply result in no one or very little people actually bothering to use the NSR for quite some time, it would take a very long time for Russian shipbuilding to fulfill the demand required in order to reach the RuGov's goal for total cargo throughput through the NSR.
Lose the NSR to who? The rate the ice is melting they wont be needing ice breakers half the year anyway. Transfer some of the work to another shipyard while upgrades are made and then shift it back and then with the sudden light speed production capacity do everyone elses work while they all get upgrades too... Rolling Eyes
To polar bears, if Baltzavod ceases work, the Soviet-era icebreaker fleet could decline without replacement, again losing throughput capacity.
I also am quite amused how you've simply just handwaved this solution, and you accuse me of having a magic wand lmao.
How about you do some research how long these remodels would last, what would be the new output, what other yards need to through it, licensing and certification for the yards to perform nuclear reactor installation, etc.
Don't make stuff up, use some numbers for a change.
It is not ever going to change... Russia will always buy some ships and products from other countries.... but right now you are pressing the accelerator and demanding progress and the engine is just grinding gears... either push in the clutch and put it in gear properly or get the **** out of the drivers seat and let someone who knows what they are doing drive this.
I press on nothing, Russians themselves don't want to import ships and components, but make their own and export them, as you know is befitting of a country that has the largest and most advanced nuclear arsenal on the planet.
It is you who is comfortable with low standards, not them.
The reason we go on and on is your inability to read what I have been saying.
Upgrading an entire ship building industry in any country takes time and you are in the middle of the process asking why everything isn't perfect and working like countries that have SPENT TRILLIONS getting this right...
Gee... I don't know... this is of course my first rodeo because in 2008 when the Russian military realised there were problems and started funding things and buying UAVS from overseas the overwhelming majority of butt hurt was... UAVS are dumb simple model planes children make... why do they need to buy them from Israel... ignoring the billions of dollars and years of development and refinement the Israelis and west spent to get to where they were with those childrens toys.
It has now been 12 years practically and now their Army and Air Force are pretty transformed and their Navy is getting there but then you would know it is harder to build a new navy than to make some new tanks.... cardboard is cheap is it not?
But no, the managers of Russian shipyards should all be fired for incompetence... they should be producing ships like the Chinese do despite not having orders for them... or anyone to pay for them... or the capacity all those new build shipyards have...
So you agree? Good.
Again, never said they need to producing ships at the rate the Chinese do, or firing anyone, you should perhaps read my posts and not reply to the strawman you've constructed in your head.
Yeah, I know... in a period of 30 years they went from disintegration of their supply and production network with the Soviet Union collapsing, and several economic collapses during the 1990s and then quite a period when the Navy was too big and had more ships and subs than they new what to do with... which is always excellent for people who build new ships, and now that demand is picking up tempo and their lack of new infrastructure is showing problems you are complaining that they are shit... what a bunch of incompetent losers... what were you saying before about setting the bar low... at least I have not taken down the bar and started beating them with it.
I am aware of the economic crises and the loss of shipyards, and I didn't beat them with a bar.
I told the truth of the state of Russian shipbuilding, you are the one seething over it.
So now you admit the problems don't exist across the board so saying they are all lacking like you did 30 seconds ago is an outright lie.
You plan around your situation which includes funding, the magic wand is needed if you want to be able to get unlimited funding and access to extra docks and areas to enable easier shifting of work while upgrades that are paid with this unlimited money are being implemented...
Where did I lie? There are certainly nuances to the problems faced by Russian shipbuilding, some have different problems than others, but in the end the state of Russian shipbuilding can be quite succinctly described by outdated methods, equipment, and infrastructure, plus lack of personnel and financial problems.
USC owns I believe something like 95 percent of Russian ship output, one corporation, I see no issue in summarizing the current problems they face "across the board".
Delays are inevidable... why do you think there will never be delays?
Sorry... forgot your magic wand...
But obviously it is the manager at that shipyard for not having or not using his magic wand.
This is comical, again never said there wouldn't have been delays, it is kind of way of life for Russian MIC.
Kilos and Ladas are vastly more important than any civilian ships.
Discussing civil shipbuilding remember?
If you neighbour was up to his eyeballs in debt and his solution to his economic problems is not to spend less or balance his income with his expenses... his solution is printing money... yeah... fine upstanding role model of a man... especially the way he promotes his building and car repair companies by going around burning down buildings and ramming cars on the street to stoke up business...
It is kind of the privilege that comes with owning the world financial system, as for failed state, can you compare standard of living between USA and Russia for me? Do you want me to pull up figures from Rosstat on how many Russians emigrated to the USA and how it has increased?
Why set your self such hard limits... why not world supplier of magic wands too?
All I said was for Russia to meet it's own demand, why so aggressive?
No need for magic want factory.
Most cannot.... Russia couldn't even when they obviously could because cheap food from the EU made production of food in Russia uncompetitive.
More like sanctions actually gave RusGov a good kick in the ass, you know they were perfectly comfortable with situation as it was before Crimea?
Not to mention talk and offers of joining NATO.
That is fine, those foreign countries wont cut Russia off because they need Russias oil.
Ahh, Russia doesn't need it's own advanced engineering sector, good to know.
Meanwhile Novatek is leading it's own efforts in localizing advanced equipment in Russia for it's LNG projects.
They aren't as comfortable as you.
When Zvezda got its first crane I seem to remember it was PD who complained that it was foreign made and not Russian made... why are they buying foreign cranes... well if they only have two WTF is the point in setting up production of a product you have to design yourself of which you plan to make 2 of... it is just silly.
Sure, it makes no sense, it is a very niche product that is very expensive and difficult to produce.
Again, I asked for Russia to meet it's own demand and have self-sufficiency in components, stuff like engines, electronics, other equipment.
So what is with all this butt hurt coming from you.... waaa... there are problems.... well they can fix those.... but there are these problems... but they are being fixed... but they aren't already fixed and producing at max potential capacity... well that would be a goal but it takes time for solutions to have the desired effect... waaa the problems...
This butthurt is imaginary in your head. As I said before, I don't exactly lose sleep over this. It is just absurd to me to see people delude themselves instead of accepting actual reality and truth of a situation.
I am not pro-Russian or pro-West, only pro-truth.
You are the one demanding instant solutions.
I am sure you will have no issue pointing out where I demanded such things.
I don't believe that, because everything is so fucking perfect and everyone else is meeting their deadlines and the Orcs are not sabotaging production... I mean when you are building a ship that is supposed to be ready first and suddenly the Orcs refuse to deliver engines that were paid for then obviously you just pop that ship out of the queue and everything just leap frogs ahead and keeps to its original time table because obviously the US coup de ta in Kiev was to be expected and everything that followed after that was already listed in all their plans... only a real dickhead would demand they stuck to the plan and launched those ships without core parts to keep everything else on schedule because obviously river boats are vastly the most critical types of ships being built anywhere... you said so yourself.
I honestly don't understand the point you are trying to make here, what do Orcs, Kiev, river boats have to do with the fact that Russian shipyards blow past deadlines?
Sounds like you disagree with yourself.
FFS Garry, what metric you want to compare then?
As I said above, I compared Russia with the world leaders, total deadweight, gross tons, and total orderbook. I didn't just select total deadweight, it's a good metric, but there are nuances that need to be understood and that comes with actually reading and researching.
I am honestly amused that you are so hung up on this selection of total deadweight, do you think selecting by another metric will suddenly reveal the truth about the hidden glory of Russian shipyards?
You can pick what you like, as I have said before, present me your own figures and actually COMPARE THEM.
No it does not make sense at all... how the **** can they be overloaded with local orders if their terrible record and slow building process and time and money wastages mean they will shift their orders to foreign yards... if that were actually true the problems would solve themselves... Obviously...
It makes total sense, because Russian navy doesn't want to place orders abroad for very obvious reasons, Rosatom is not going to hand over sensitive technical information and certification to install naval reactors on icebreakers abroad.
And if the keel quota program for civil ships didn't exist, as well as RusGov organizations and other state corporations didn't exist and were mandated by law to place certain orders at Russian yards, then yes Garry, it is very likely that vast majority of Russian shipyards would go out of work and many Russians to lose income.
I am suggesting they don't have time to wash their hands because that is an inefficient waste of time, but the snow flake obviously has to make it racist.
Who was talking about strawman arguments...
Hilarious, your first response to learning about the efficiency and capability of Asian shipyards was to imply that they don't wash their hands?
Doesn't exactly sound kind.
You believe T-14s have cardboard armour, or was it just flame bait?
No genius, I was pointing out that you and others sound exactly like Ukrainians talking about Russian equipment and tech. You know when it was first unveiled they started going on and on about how it has "thin hatches" and "cardboard turret armor".
And now it looks exactly the same to me when I read miketheterrible's and other's posts on the 055 Chinese cruiser thread, I mean it just reeks of butthurt.
Really don't understand what you are talking about here.... why would Chinese ships have Russian names? and who would complain about it even if you did... everyone would just think you were mental.
Impressive reading comprehension.
You know how people talk about how if you replaced "Russians" with "Jews" in the headlines and writings that Western writers and other morons make discussing Russians/Russia, then people would freak out, but since it is about Russians, the West considers it acceptable?
It is the same thing here, the way miketheterrible (and others) talk about the 055 cruiser looks the exact same as Ukrainians shitposting on Armata, Su-57, etc.
No actual reasoned discourse, China has big ship and Russia doesn't? Just start shitflinging apparently. The 40k helicarriers that were laid down at Zaliv are big large vessels, those are good but Chinese ones bad?
What will this forum think when the Super-Gorshkov's are laid down in SevVerf's new boathouse? It will likely very much be close in displacement to the 055, judging by massive growth trends in Russian naval orders, will it be bad or good now just because it is Russian?
So let them fucking implement the new concepts and designs as well as build the infrastructure necessary in their shipyards to change the way they do things and stop bleating like a little bitch about how it is not done already.
They are changing more than one shipyard and those shipyards are already working on projects... you don't believe in magic wands so you must realise even if they stopped all other work it will take 2-3 years or more and because they are not going to stop work it might take 5 or 6 or more years.
Grow up.
Hilarious, where again am I whining and bitching? Demanding they complete things faster?
You've conditioned yourself into lashing out as soon as anything negative is said about Russia in general lmao.
You're the one that needs to grow up, not constantly wringing your hands over every criticism and negative statement.
Polish and Baltic politicians regularly threaten to shoot down Russian aircraft... the US of A is supporting terrorist organisations around the world many of whom try to kill Russians too...
So....no one else but Turkey and Georgia in past two decades, got it, thanks for letting me know.
Wrong... invalid logic. Just because they choose to make something more important or urgent does not mean they cannot make the other things... it means they choose not to make them and make the more important products the more urgent products instead.
You're outright bullshitting and honestly delusional.
They are acquiring the capabilty to manufacture the ships they desire right before your very eyes, Zvezda was SPECIFICALLY to make large sea going vessels that you are so against and claiming Russia doesn't need them.
Russia DOES need these vessels, get over it.
I also find it hilarious that you think they choose not to? How is a shipyard like Onega or Krasnoye Somorvo supposed to make a supertanker? They can only make smaller vessels, where are they going to whipout a ship like Vladimir Monomakh?
And you go on about magic wands.
It is a floating dock get over it. Think of it as a river boat... that can sink and refloat itself.
Oh this is rich, wealthy white dude in New Zealand knows best than the Russian fleet over how much that floating dock was vital to them.
You think RuMoD was happy over this, that they didn't mind and it was no biggie? They utterly lost their shit. They not only lost ability to repair Adm Kuz, but that floating dock was vital to repairing other vessels for the Northern fleet, it's loss was deeply painful to fleet operation, unless you think Russian ships maintain themselves.
Again.... logic requires proof, there are plenty of countries with good living standards that doe not dominate the world ship production ranks... you provide no link between the two things so there is no logical proof that Russia creating a world class ship building capacity will equate to better living standards for Russians.
It may always be cheaper and faster to get China to make their civilian ships for them and that is fine... when I upgrade my computer I don't feel the need to develop and produce my own new hardware, for which I would then need to develop my own software for my new custom rig... it is just cheaper to buy the parts off the shelf and build my own...
Plenty of countries with good living standards and no ship industry with the population of Russia?
Germany, France, Italy, Japan, South Korea(this one is a little less applicable), China(catching up in living standards), really the only exception is the USA, they outsourced their shipbuilding as it was more profitable for them, and kept only military shipbuilding. They now keenly regret this decision.
Yeah, they should have anticipated that after a long period of neglect and misuse that all of a sudden they were going to get lots of customers wanting new ships made with so much foreign parts that they would need sizable loans before they could even get the money for the raw materials let alone arrange the import licences for all the foreign components... assuming they are not french and wont come under sanction half way through production... yeah, those stupid shipyards... I mean banks can tell years in advance when their corrupt practices will lead to a housing bubble and then a collapse, why should shipyards not be expected to see the future with this level of accuracy that they can put aside money they don't have yet for jobs they have not done yet to pay for upgrades they don't need yet because they don't have any orders... until they do.... like now... when it is too late to plan for because the money you got from the customer is tied up in materials and equipment and labour to actually make the boats.
Maybe a combination of forcing local companies to buy local but also agree to a 30% mark up for profit so they can make enough money to start dealing with debt and upgrade and improve infrastructure instead of just paying interest to banks with all their profits.
In fact with all the facts and figures in front of them they should be able to work out jobs that work out costing them money and just cancelling those deals... that will free up time and space and money for upgrades while the important stuff gets done.
I am no expert but I rather suspect that is what they are actually doing.
Thirty percent markup? You joke? You think Russian customer's budgets are so large and wealthy now apparently too.
Talk about magic wands.
Time and money and efficiency.... if they can't do it cheaper and faster then let someone who can do that... it is not about giving up, it is about common sense.
Do you buy food, or do you grow your own.... a bit risky relying on others to grow your food for you... you don't know what chemicals they use to make it look nice and last longer... nobody and no country has the resources or indeed the inclination to be totally self sufficient... it is not actually efficient to do everything for yourself... there will be a lot of ships they just want to use that are the same no matter where they are made, that do the same job and probably have all the same foreign components in them anyway... Russia does not need to fight every single battle... choosing battles is much more important.
Putin showed that with his EU food ban... without their stupid sanctions allowing him to reciprocate there is no way their food ban would hold up under WTO rules... except as a response to EU sanctions on Russia... lucky Russia.
Got it, just give up on an important industry for Russia and her interests.
So they have years at the top of the shipbuilding trade and they still import parts... so why should backward lowly Russia even consider such a handicap to its customer base at this stage... maybe later on...
Although the Russian Navy is already doing this anyway... they didn't get a choice.
Sure they import parts, I almost guarantee you nearly every large vessel they made uses Wartsila diesels, but it doesn't exactly excuse Russia, it doesn't get to be a US ally and be all nice and integrated into the advanced manufacturing sector. It needs it's own, if you think otherwise it is too bad, Russians themselves are working on it.
h please... Russians are not natural world class ship builders but you think South Korean and Japanese are?
The Dutch and British and many other European countries have long histories in engineering and shipbuilding and have kept up with new technology... but guess what... the UK and the EU are not the hubs of shipbuilding they used to be so there wont be as many jobs there, certainly not as high paying as in Asian countries where they are working hard and pumping out ships and need expertise... I am sure it all originally came from South Korea and Japan and they didn't head hunt talent in other countries that were at the time leaders in the field of ship building to build up their industry.
Yes, I must be fucking racist... obviously race is the main reason they are good at ship building because the last 600 years it has been South Korea and Japan dominating the water ways of the world with all their junk that was state of the art... not like the western shit the white europeans were exploring the world on...
Europe didn't have have any Goliath cranes in the 1920s... fucking amateurs... it is because they are white of course.
Oh I quite assure you, the practices and skill that made SK a shipbuilding titan, especially in 1980s and such didn't come from British or Dutch people.
They ruthlessly squeezed out all efficiency they possibly could out of existing shipbuilding practices, and then made their own when those weren't good enough.
Sorry, when you said Russia needs to emulate SK and the Japs I assumed when you complained at the foreign content of ships made in Russia that that was also something they needed to emulate.
They certainly should emulate SK and Japanese building methods and equipment, Zvezda did and it's output will exceed literally every other yard in Russia combined several times over.
As for foreign content, it is not SK and Japan that wants to stand against US and it's allies for it's own interests, then again, I don't know exact statistic of foreign content in SK built vessels, could be lower than 70 percent for all we know.
The western sanctions on bits and pieces applies to the Russian Navy, so I would expect most of the navigation and other gear they use will already have Russian equivalents... besides they could buy all the Chinese bits until Russian bits are ready... I assume they make all their own bits too... I know the US doesn't...
Even less money for domestic manufacturers, true solution. Also equipment for military vessels is a bit different from civilian ones you understand, a military standard nav system isn't exactly a good fit for civilian needs, I don't think they would appreciate the additional cost increase of standards like, withstanding nuclear blasts or shrapnel. This was actually a big problem with civilian USSR products.
ey are supporting my comfortable life by buying my evil bits and pieces instead of Russian parts made by Russian workers in high paying jobs improving their standard of living...
Gonna execute every Russian with smartphone now too?
So Russian companies that order ships from Russian shipyards that demand foreign parts be used are not the problem?
You are not being very clear.
It would be nice if they made an effort to buy Russian, RuNavy and other state orgs try to, but free market is kind of important to healthy economy you know, Russians didn't exactly appreciate their previous system very much.
Yeah, that is maths speak for I am a fucking censored .
What you are saying is that you want to compare to countries that are not comparable using a factor that distorts the comparison so much there is no point in making such a stupid comparison in the first place, but you soldier on anyway and use statistics BS tricks of adjustment and alteration to create a result that looks more realistic.
Why bother?
Why not just say Italy and Russia are not comparable by any metric at all and leave it at that... but no... use math tools for purposes they were never intended for to make up shit numbers you can then talk shit about....ooooh... the result is 3.2 which means you just need a magic wand to fix their ship building industry and everything will be fine. Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes
What a crock of shit.
You want to use nominal comparison method with Russia then? Be my guest, you won't like the numbers there then.
Remember, you yourself talked about how great and efficient Russian MIC is with these prices that used nominal system.
You offered Italy as a candidate for comparison... you might as well offered a chocolate pudding for the value involved.
So you don't understand the subject, got it.
They have two carriers they can't use together with destroyers that can't operate in the warm waters of the Med without breaking down because the water isn't cold enough to cool the engines... Russia has just perfected the designs of some corvettes and some frigates and is testing an upgrade of the latter following which they plan to put them in serial production.... they are already better armed than any British surface ship which gets called a destroyer, and the new upgraded Gorshkov with increased launch tubes is even better and they expect to make more than 6...
Needless to say Boris vs Putin...
So they do outweigh them, got it.
The HMS Daring class air defence destroyer has 48 tubes for a SAM system inferior to Redut, a 4.5 inch gun that has nothing special about it, and 8 Harpoon anti ship missiles... again very ordinary...
What Russian corvette has 48 SAM tubes? Gun systems are now relevant in 2021 now as well? And 8 Harpoons, funny I can think of a few Russian corvettes also armed with just eight of a similar class of missile.
They got stuck with two white elephants they don't have the support ships to operate properly, which means when one is away sailing in the South China sea there are no ships left at all to patrol local waters around the UK.
So they did build them.
Of course, context means nothing, and their overall situations are meaningless... you clearly want Russia to aspire to be a naval power like Britain is now... what did you say about aiming low?
We are comparing shipbuilding, not healthcare. As for aspirations, I don't think Russia would mind having the capability to build two carriers the size of QE, they have been planning so for some time now.
So they are costing money.... cut them lose and get their civilian stuff made in China...
Obliterate incomes of hundreds of thousands of Russians, any more ideas?
Of course not. Turd class is a class of its own.
Anyone can squat and drop a Zumwalt... real ships that work and are useful require planning...
So no 17k ton surface combantants produced by Russia, thank you for confirming.
Reading english is possibly an important part of misunderstanding.
I said:
US naval fighters are ordinary(not very good) and inferior (not as good as...) to Rafales
US Navy doesn't operate F-35s? Or Marines?
F-35B/C I believe are certainly naval fighters, and they are operating now.
Working to test and construct a Frigate with all new weapons and sensor systems never used before on Russian or Soviet Frigates might take a bit of time... especially on a budget.... the communications and sensors on these ships are astounding and fully in line with the latest stuff the Italians could make for the US...
Their new Frigates will be able to hit conventional land targets 5,000km away, and reach 1,000km with a land attack and anti ship missile that moves at more than 3km per second... of course it is going to take time... they are upgrading everything... and it is more multirole than a Kirov class cruiser... but obviously with less on board weapons in terms of numbers.
No Garry, waiting to induct a frigate for a decade is not normal or a good sign, it's incredibly long to work out issues for a naval air defense system.
Well they could play ball and order some fucking boats in a series instead of one offs that always take longer and are harder to make.
??? Where are these one offs?
The fact that you think there are powerful HATO countries means you are already lost.
Any child can have a tantrum and break stuff like Libya and Syria... who wants close relations with a child?
When countries in the middle east want to talk about the current situation they don't go to London or Washington... and African countries are starting to do the same.
I'll let Russian military planners know there is nothing to fear then, I don't think they'd very much agree with you.
But you are certain that no astronaut or cosmonaut up there would not want fried chicken, because paste is wonderful and satisfies more than a KFC bucket ever could. The fact that you think that is a racist slur is amusing because I quite like KFC too, but a brand of food is racism... how do KFC continue to trade?
Oh please, you know perfectly well how KFC is used as derogatory slurs towards African Americans and their diets, the internet is full of jokes on blacks being nothing more than apes desiring watermelons and fried chicken. Do you live under a rock?
Again, you think a post talking about how a racial minority US astronaut would snap and go crazy and cause an incident due to lack of fried chicken and using the term "sheboon" (equating them to monkeys), is totally acceptable to be on Russian space program thread?
Like calling someone a moron or a bad admin... I understand what a slur is.
I also am very familiar with the old rules and what the new rules now are, and it mentions disrespecting mods and doing as mods tell you... written by Vlad.
I could have banned dozens of members on this forum for breaking those rules... I didn't make them up, they are there for all to see... but Vlad made this site out of frustration at being banned for his views and assuming other rules are not broken, I think he would not be too upset if I banned these people, but maybe I care less what you think of me as I really don't know you.
I personally think banning is a very last resort... there are exceptions.
One member told another member to kill themselves... that is an easy ban... no need to think much about that.
But this is essentialy a group of strangers that chat about topics they are mutually interested in... some seem to come for arguments, but that often gets boring quickly. Sometimes some people will say things they regret or wouldn't normally say in public because they get comfortable and think they are amongst friends.
I don't think members should be banned outright for making mistakes... especially when the person offended is offended for others.
If an african american person does want to pop in and have a chat about what they have to put up with and why it is offensive then I think that makes this a better forum, not a worse one for hiding behind virtue signalling offense.
So you know what a slur is, you think sheboon isn't a slur? If you think it is, do you think it belongs in Russian space program? Would it not be offtopic at the very least?
Every country is made up of cities and regions and there is bigotry agaisnt different regions in every country.
In this case Jafa is Just Another Fucking Aucklander... it just identifies an arrogant person from up north who thinks they are better than everyone else around them when they travel south.
Every country has that sort of casual racism, but most of the time they don't even care if you say it to their faces because they have probably called us much worse.... usually sheep shagger or some such crap.
Slurs are usually used to get a rise when other rude words don't seem to work... why ban them when they clearly work.
Dude you need to wake up, you think a nickname for a dude from certain city is the same as a word used to equate blacks with apes?
We are adults and adults do more than say bad words... some times they do what the words mean.
I would certainly discourage bad language in any thread, but some people are frustrating to talk to sometimes and I know you know exactly what I mean.
Banning someone for the use of a word is a very drastic thing... especially when no one was so offended that they bothered to mention it till several days after it was posted.
Again, didn't even ask you to ban it, you think it is a normal and good thing to have on a thread about Russian space program?
So it is a website for asshole murdering extremists... thanks for the comparison... really glad you are not over reacting to this.
Yeah, language used there perfectly matches up with Lyle's post that he deleted.
He deleted it himself... I call that a much better result than having me wipe your asses for you like you are kids.
Good, he had some shame then over his behavior.
It was an example of very bad humour... some people like that.
Did you hear about what the poor blind, dumb, deaf girl with no arms and no legs and cerebral palsy got for Christmas?
Cancer.
That isn't racist or sexist... not to everyones tastes but where to draw the line?
Russian space program thread is a place for rude jokes?
Yes it is.
I can look every day, but there is no way I read every single post from Vann or Tsavo Lion.... I certainly don't take teh time to watch every single video link posted as some of them I don't find interesting, though to be fair some of them I do... A good indication will be a like from me...
It is much easier when members read these posts themselves and anything that offends you or you think might be close to the bone can send me a private message... no drama.... no police state action.... tell me where it is and what is so offensive or lowers the tone of the website and I will take a look at it and talk to the person who posted it. I don't mention who complained because that is not important... I just discuss with the person about what they posted and why they posted it and most of the time they agree it was out of line and remove it themselves with no further action needed.
Obviously if they repeatedly get complaints over and over then I would look at further action, but some people get offended at the slightest thing... for every person that posts on this or any forum there are literally hundreds of people who never post and I suspect either they don't want to look a fool and be bullied or they know they might come across as offensive.
Of course there will be plenty who don't think they can contribute and just want to listen in on the discussions.
Probably not this one though.
Fine then, you didn't see it, I won't launch an inquisition then, I noticed there is word filter on website, why not add these words there? Would make your job easier.
The post was removed by the person who posted it.... lesson perhaps learned... isn't that the best possible outcome in this situation?
BTW have you read some of the posts of our French bodybuilder? Some of his comments border on third reich stuff, but he is young.... actually we haven't heard from him in a while...
Another poster was Nick, but he has since been banned for something else from memory.
Yeah he removed it, it is good, it didn't belong there in the first place.
And no I haven't, is he also making racist posts in threads that don't belong?
If I was an expert on American culture and had training in racism through the years in the US and recognised the word as being a slur I probably would have had a word, but I don't remember reading the post.
You could have probably inferred it wasn't a very kind statement, but fine, you didn't read it, all the best to just update the word filter, you want assistance in that and what words should be on it? I will gladly help you.
We have at least one lady here and to be honest sexism is not really an issue most of the time.... yeah... I will of course say that because I am a man... but today I might be a duvet cover or lounge suite... sexism is not OK but there is no way I am not going to take the piss out of someone who does not know what gender they are at the moment and think it is something they should be allowed to choose... otherwise we could all be little black half asian girls so no one can be racist or sexist right?
Christ, will you or will you not do your job?
Scorpius never said Russia was outproducing anyone... he was just showing you some ships that they made that were more complex than you were suggesting river boats were, and you abused him for it.
Point to where I abused him and I will apologize.
Secondly, that is not what happened.
He specifically replied to the post where I asked for metrics proving that Russia outproduced SK or Japan in some manner, he posted quotations from Russian websites either summing civil and military construction, planned construction throughout 2024, and others.
Nothing he posted proved his point, I pointed out so, and his only response were some pictures of vessels under construction in Russian yards, ironically one of them was Vladimir Monomakh, a ship nearly entirely constructed in South Korea.
Perhaps if you were paying attention you might have heard what points he was making, which were not the same as the points made that started this tantrum rant.
He specifically replied to my post and QUOTED my request for metrics that proved Russia overtook SK/Japan. What other point was he trying to make?
Respect diversity of opinion and not bully people you think are wrong... bloody words to live by... are you getting a hint yet or shall we flog Scorpius and Hole for not immediately flip flopping on what they posted...
Oh really? Where did I behave the same way as you, describing ships using "faggot", describing my posts as bitching and moaning, whiny tantrums, KVS going on about how I am a butthurt Ukrainian troll, need I go on?
Where did I do the same to Scorpius and Hole? Did I call them morons, slurs, described them as trolls, portraying them as infants to be talked down to, as if I am some mighty being who's words are gospel?
I never attacked anyone for having their opinions, I didn't call them names, they made a claim, I called bullshit, and here we are, not a single comparison yet made by them actually proving their point.
I asked very simply, provide me metrics comparing Russia and SK/Japan, I am the only one who produced such figures, everyone else has simply attacked me for it.
So again, X and Y, what ships did Russia produce in a year of your choice, or range of years of your choice, what was the average tonnage? How many tons of metal were processed in Russian shipyards compared to others?
Give me Russian figures, and give me SK and Japanese ones, and show me how Russia is displacing them. It's very simple.
I posted my own figures and SOURCES showing it. Scorpius did not list ONE figure from Japan or SK. Nor Hole either. Not KVS, no one.
What... Russia has no Trolls?
All Russians must have taken their Vaccines by now if none of them are anti vaccine.
BTW a troll is a mythical creature from scandinavian/european mythology... if Vann has European heritage that could be considered a racial slur...
Wonder if you are offending him for posting his views?
You cannot be serious, troll as a racial slur? What else will you come up with?
Well how else can they upgrade their yards and tooling and way of making ships... work around the hulls already in place?
You complain they are not going fast enough and taht the solution is a shipyard upgrade and revision of the entire ship building process which is going to require they buy a shit load of new very big cranes.... how many hours were you expecting that to take?
How much longer would it take with normal production going on around it?
Who is talking shit now?
I didn't complain over anything, I told you what current state of Russian shipbuilding is and how it compared to others, nor I did I demand I drop all production and whip out a check to a crane manufacturer. They have their own plan for expanding construction, I certainly don't know enough to try and draw up a better one.
You said they don't make them right and it is a catch 22 situation where they can't upgrade and improve efficiency with the workload they have and the workload they have keeps them working so they can't just get rid of that while they upgrade... so the result is that they are where they currently are.... you fucking genius... thanks for your expert knowledge and understanding of the situation... what you are basically saying is taht they are useless because they make stuff the old way and are in no immediate position to fix that, but plans are in place to transition to more modern building practises when there is an opportunity to do so.
They have crippling debt limiting their abilty to manouver, but this is being solved slowly too.
There is no faster or easier or more sensible way to solve these very specific and peculuar problems that were naturally created by an up to date ship building industry stagnating for 20 years and then finding itself behind best practises and struggling to catch up.
No genius, simply someone who informed himself on the subject. Again, only reason I brought these issues up was to compare to SK or Japan when posters claimed Russia overtook them, how could they overtake if their shipyards aren't as efficient and capable as them? It's simply not possible.
No, those fucking losers have an easy job that they are in a bad situation they clearly brought on themselves through their own proven corruption and inept management... not expanding or upgrading infrastructure without money or orders is clearly bordering on theft... send them to the gulag...
Thanks again for the help Captain Obvious.
You deride me, yet it seems you have trouble accepting the obvious.
That is exactly why your comment got that response...
Can't find a strong enough eye rolling emoji for you.
The history of the west cannot be understood if you read what they wrote about their own history.... try a better source like Oliver Stone...
What does history of the west and Oliver Stone have to do with shipbuilding now?
Greed in implementing safety practises? They are building ships the old way... how could new safety practises be applied properly doing it the wrong way?
Shipyard work has always been dangerous. but of course only Russians die... because of corruption or they don't care...
No, not only Russians, shipyards are indeed dangerous, doesn't give excuse to Russians to not implement safety practices, or you think sinking drydocks and fires on board Adm Kuz are just part of the job?
You are talking about respect for life... specifically Russian lives.... there is none of that in the west.
If you say black people are dumber than white people.... they can't help it... it is genetics... you would probably lose your job in the west, but when the head of the CIA says Russian people are genetically predisposed to be bad... to be wrong... no one says a word.
Your fear for the future of ethinic and gender minorities is amusing because Russians are now the minority of the western world that don't get protected or shielded from offense... you dirty rotten hackers and election stealers you...
Holy shit dude, this is about safety in shipyards, head of CIA denigrated Russians now it's ok for Russians to die preventable deaths in accidents at shipyards? So if someone insults me, it's ok for me to not take my own safety seriously and get into a car crash?
Want to know what happened with the floating dock that sank? It got sold to Rosneft, suddenly, some time later, while working on the flagship for the Russian Northern Fleet, it sank due to improper measures taken, which involved not maintaining the safety systems that would have prevented the ballast tanks flooding when they weren't supposed to, the emergency generator that would have pumped out water and kept it afloat was literally not maintained and inoperable when it was needed.
Did the CIA do this? Western agents? No, it was greed and cost cutting that got those workers killed, that left families ruined. The **** does the West have do it with this? NOTHING.
But they are the river boats of the worlds subs... they are literally sub standard... clown
No actual response, got it.
Russia needs Zumwalts like it needs Nimitz class carriers... the ones that work...
Russia does not need an invasion carrier to attack countries and invade for resources.
Russia will most likely have a version of the Coalition 152mm gun fitted to their destroyers and Cruisers that is going to be everything the gun on the Zumwalt was supposed to be... long range, accurate, and affordable... Russia does not need to pine over Americas cast offs.
So what will be the 40k ton helicarriers used for? And likely the future CVN program? Peaceful purposes as opposed to evil American boats of malice?
These types of ships are designed expressly for enforcing your own interests in foreign countries. Of course, intent matters, but intent is not part of ship design.[/quote]