Also the Altius but also just making the first models not in service yet.
Good opportunity for testing though...
Even if they just fly a stripped down model to soak up some BUKs and S-300s while using some ARMs to try to hit anything shooting at it using a radar.
The Altius being a long endurance drone for reconnaissance and the S-70 for quickly striking targets; mostly in the role as a bomber.
Agree that the Altius is a HALE or MALE, while S-70 is a wingman type drone for operating with fighters, or perhaps used on its own as a strike weapon... a sort of reusable cruise missile that can hit multiple targets and return with recon information about what it saw.
Concerning their use in the Ucrainian operation, basically till now Russia mainly used reconnaissance drones (they have many different types of those).
But that just makes sense... larger MALE and HALE types are horribly vulnerable to enemy AD and air power and are worth the risk of shooting down because they are a threat and are not super cheap.
Right now when Kiev is trying to rush Russian held positions with raw numbers and their AD damaged and concentrated mainly near military positions sending suicide drones will either cause serious damage and therefore force them to spread their AD to try to cover that... spreading it thinly and making it harder to hide, or they keep their AD with their forces leaving their flanks and rear exposed for drones to hit supply columns and ammo and fuel and weapon dumps.
Either way now is the time to use such drones, which would have been less useful before.
The early use of drones was to correct artillery fire and they appear to have done an outstanding job. Special forces obviously would also have their own drones.
These Iranian drones are very noisy... and I suspect that is on purpose.... it attracts enemy fire revealing firing positions to better eyes operating much higher up, and it would have a serious psychological effect too.
Now thanks to the Iranian drones they have a much cheaper alternative to attack aircrafts and cruise missile strikes. Of course it is a different type of weapons, and they cannot substitute long range missiles and real aviation but they cover a useful niche previously "neglected".
They have been using the odd suicide drone already... it is only recently it made sense to shift to more intensive use of such drones.
The denial that Iran sold Russia drones but now Russia has them in mass production suggests to me that they were able to deny any purchase because such purchases and licence production agreements happened months ago.
There is a larger version of Orion, called Sirius or something like that and also Helios. Both are in test phase. I would bet that Kronshtadt will come up first with serial model, as they showed more capapble than Sokol.
Pretty sure they would be keen to get a prototype into a realistic testing environment as quickly as they can...
Sooner or later we will probably see an APS of some sort that can use small TOR-like missiles that will by launch at incoming missiles. Sounds like fantasy but I think it is what it will come to.
They want them for ground vehicles to defend against artillery shells and artillery rockets so mounting them in bombers and fighters to defend them from SAMs and AAMs wouldn't be that far away... so helicopters next?
It´s more likely that in a few years manned attack helis will only use stuff like Izd. 305 + Vikhr or other ATGM´s in the same class while the use of unguided rockets against infantry will be delegated to heli drones. At least against near-peer enemies.
Area targets are area targets... if a helicopter needs to engage troops spread out in a field then unguided rockets and cannon fire are still the weapons of choice... lofting them for standoff range against peer enemies seems to work.
The ballistic range of the rockets is a known quantity and their digital maps and the known coordinates of the enemy means you could loft rockets easily enough to bracket large area targets easily enough.
Those box shaped rocket pods could be designed in the fuselage and thick wing of a large aircraft so they can be extended to fire or to reload and retracted for zero drag in flight...
Edward Snowden is a Russian citizen. Very good decision. If the West had more Snowden and Assange things would be fine.
They are both patriots... rather than ignore criminal activity they revealed it to the public in the hopes it would be dealt with properly... but clearly those with blood on their hands had powerful strings in their hands so the criminal activity continues unpunished and those trying to fix the west are demonised by the west.
Agreed, can't believe that bitch from Sky News also hasn't been banned either. Rosenberg should've been kicked out years ago. Why is Russia allowing foreign agents like them to still operate in the country while the West bans any pro-Russian media?
Well I suspect part of the issue is like Navalny... the best way to deal with them is let them speak and reveal their true nature... but snakes can be mesmerising...
I get that I do, because it's repeated ad infinitum on all blogs and on the forum
But it's just not true...
All these MOD statements about "hundreds of fighters killed" do not add up to getting pushed out of Kharkov
Look at the battle of Stalingrad... if the Soviets had just sent in all their forces at once the Germans would not have taken very much of the city at all and likely would have sent even more reinforcements to support the attack and of course holding the city would mean they could hammer it over and over from the air killing rather more soviet soldiers.
The point is that they drip fed troops into the battle and let the Germans gradually commit to taking the city piece by piece till only tiny parts remained... and then they used their forces they had been building up all this time to encircle the enemy forces now trapped in the city... no food no ammo no support in the middle of winter... so they did the only thing they could do at those temperatures with no food no ammo no fuel... they surrendered.
U.S will support both Pakistan & China if they go to war with India. If past is precedent then China will receive a lot of support from U.K as well.
The US wouldn't support China in anything at all, and there are more potential buyers of blue jeans and motorcycles in India than there are in Pakistan... they flipped on that choice a while back.
What they wont do is let India become much more developed and independent...
Exactly. This sounds like the excuse that the raid and retreat around kiev permanently pinned down and destroyed ukrainian troops which would make donbass much easier to take. Well, what a lie that was.
You are the liar.... there was never any claim the raid around Kiev would permanently do anything... the point of the raid was to pin down forces near there that could otherwise be sent to the Donbass because back then they had armour and they had fuel and if they weren't busy where they were they could have been sent to increase the strength of the Orc forces in the Donbass.
After a few months of taking out armour and fuel dumps and ammo dumps it was clearly decided that the Orc army had lost much of its mobility and it was safe to fall back to positions that could not be shelled by the Orcs.
BTW are russians using DRGs too to ambush troops behind enemy lines? Why can't several spetsnaz DRGs infiltrate around slavyansk and use the assistance of pro-russians there to destroy ukrainian SAMs and artillery?
Why didn't they think of that?
You really think the Russians are fuckwits don't you...
Most of the time the Ka-52 carries 2 pods (40 S-8 rockets) + a few ATGM´s. A 3,5t heli drone should be able to carry the same ammount of weapons and could operate closer to the frontline. Every regiment could have one unit for direct fire support. Which would take some years, of course.
And get shot down by the first stinger...
Mark Sleboda said on a Sputnik interview that the biggest concern for NATO jumping is a move on Odessa.
**** HATO... there was a time for talking but they thought using force was their way forward...
I'm just saying , when it happens , it will be the biggest moment of tension as the last valuable piece is taken off the board.
They made their own bed... who cares if they refuse to lie in it.
For nothing, we all write about Odessa, Kharkov, Nikolaev if the Russians have no plan to take those areas. It is not a problem to occupy them, but the problem is how many people will remain in those cities.
There might be a couple of million expats in Russia that want to go home to a safe Ukraine with a future... something the west effectively stole from them.
"Provocative" is to have HATO nazis at a 100% Russian city like Odessa...
Or to turn Sevastopol into a HATO naval base...
The effect is, that it is almost impossible to lock on to it with any MANPADS the Ukrainians have.
Then they don't have Iglas, because they are quite good against such targets...
Now, the bulk of the Russian optical lens production bases on the supplies of optical grade glass from China.
Don't believe that. Russian optics are rather good, their glass technology is very good too... the glass blocks the Mi-28 uses for its canopy can withstand direct hits from 14.5mm HMGs placed less than 10 metres from the side... no penetrations and smooth internal surface of the material.
It appears that both Nord Stream I and II have been sabotaged and will require a rebuild to make functional again.
This is not a side show.
Doesn't matter... I would expect Russia to cease delivery of gas to all EU countries supporting Kiev with money and weapons about the middle of this winter.
Dima is trying to play a badass with this kind of stupid comments, while he is only making a fool of himself.
What fuckin' nuclear weapon, for the gods of Ethernia?!?
Most western people think war is something that happens on different continents and that they are safe. Well prices going up and "enemy" countries talking about using nuclear weapons they actually have might get some results.
The notion that Russia would need to use nuclear weapons against the Kiev regime is ludicrous. Look at the performance of the
Kiev regime forces on the battlefield.
A string of tactical nuclear explosions along its western border with Poland might seal up some leaking threats to Russian forces...
Use of nuclear weaponry in this stage of the conflict would hurt cooperative ties between Russia, China, Turkey, Israel, India and so on so it is a 'last resort' weapon with great consequences. In this stage absolutely nonsense to even mention except for propaganda purposes.
When the other side thinks they can continue to escalate sometimes it makes sense to remind them where that leads to.
The old cowboy analogy fits this... the western model of nuclear conflict expect things to start with harsh words and then a few slaps and then punches and then chairs being thrown and bottles and knives and then finally they go for their pistols.
The Soviet model points out that if that is the case what is to stop the other guy going for his gun when you have both your hands on that chair you are holding above your head to throw at him?
Real fights in the wild west had nothing to do with fights in hollywood movies... you drew your gun first, you shot first and you survived and then you made up the story about him shooting first after getting his gun and firing a shot from that too before the sheriff arrived.
It's hard to return the favor as the majority of gas production in the US comes from land, with only a very small portion retrieved from drilled wells in the Gulf of Mexico.
Stop selling Uranium fuel to them... their nuclear power plants rely on it.
I see only 6 rockets in the NASAMS system so just send a dozen cheap suicide drones to overwhelm the system and its gone. I doubt they have implemented proper multi-layer air defense coverage.
Once you locate the launcher that is the perfect plan, or low flying cruise missiles.
All radar would need to be engaged too on a regular basis to limit its effectiveness.
You have been trying to justify the current **** ups with pointless statistics from a US war that happened 60 years ago and has nothing to do with the current conflict , so please bare with my whining for just a little bit.
An enemy in the Orcs current position over extending itself and attacking... what is not to like...
I don't think he meant ukro-hai hordes . To me its warning about NATO not to "take Odessa and Transnistria under international protection" . Or sinking Russian ships as some imaginary red line was crossed.
That is what I took it to mean too... HATO intervention, either against Odessa or trying to attack the Black Sea fleet.
So the whining comment right after my report about the disastrous situation around Liman had nothing to do with me? Ok
You called it... if you think a comment about whining after your post whining was directed at you then are you not agreeing with him?
What is so critical about this Liman that the entire conflict hinges on who occupies it this winter?