Russian special military operation in Ukraine #61

GarryB wrote:How many US carriers would they need to sink to make them back off out of range... I am guessing one.

The target distribution is a big deal. It is a known problem there that if you sling 20 cruise missiles at an enemy flotilla probably 18 of them are going to hit the same ship and the other 2 will have for whatever reason seen another ship first

Not if you use the P-500 and her successors.

Polish Baghdad Bob ?  


“Russia is underperforming” in its war in Ukraine, says Poland’s Foreign Minister
@radeksikorski
. “We are overperforming, and we just need to stay the course until Putin runs out of recruits and resources… We will stay the course,” he adds      

News of the day is that, finally, nuclear doctrine was updated and made to better fit modern day challenges.
Now, it covers whole Union state ( meaning Russia + Belarus) and expands on nuclear answer against non-nuclear states that are attacking Russia with the help of a nuclear one.
This opens doors to a possible tactical nuclear strike on Ukraine, as well as Poland, in regard to its stance towards
Russia and Belarus and complicity in whole Ukraine affair.
Incinerating Rzeszów will be a good warning to the rest of EU sycophants and US itself.
Nobody can say that Poland didn't ask for it with their bellicose rhetoric.
More details will be known when up to date official document is published on Kremlin's website.

https://t.me/rybar/63831

 Statements by Russian President Vladimir Putin at the meeting of the Security Council Standing Conference on Nuclear Deterrence

Key points:

The use of nuclear forces is an extreme measure to protect the country's sovereignty.

Reliable information about the launch of air and space attack weapons towards the Russian Federation will entail a nuclear response.

A critical threat to the sovereignty of the Russian Federation and non-nuclear weapons will be the basis for a nuclear response.

Russia is obliged to take into account the emergence of new sources of military threats and risks for itself and its allies.

Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in the event of aggression against Belarus.

The Russian Federation may consider the issue of using nuclear weapons after reliable data on a massive launch of missiles and UAVs when crossing the border.

The Russian Federation takes a highly responsible approach to nuclear weapons issues, seeking to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons and their components.

Russia has expanded the category of states and military alliances against which nuclear deterrence is carried out.

Today, the nuclear triad remains the most important guarantee of ensuring the security of our state.

In the updated version of the document, aggression against Russia by any non-nuclear state, but with the participation or support of a nuclear state, is proposed to be considered as a joint attack on the Russian Federation.

Sujoy wrote:The target distribution is a big deal. It is a known problem there that if you sling 20 cruise missiles at an enemy flotilla probably 18 of them are going to hit the same ship and the other 2 will have for whatever reason seen another ship first

Not if they are a pack of Russian naval missiles that have been happily chatting to each other for decades.

Clearly a double edged sword  

Thanks to Elon Musk: Russians Install Starlink on Shahed-136 for the First Time, Creating a Dangerous New Weapon – Defence Express

During today's night attack, the Ukrainian Armed Forces discovered a Geranium UAV (Shahed-136) equipped with SpaceX's Starlink satellite communications.
"This is a means of receiving feedback from the drone and the ability to transmit information from it and change the flight mission at any distance. That is, turning Shahed into a reconnaissance asset," writes Defence Express.
Such communications may be necessary for the Russian army to transmit information, for example, collected by radio equipment about the positions of the Ukrainian Air Defense Forces. Or, if the drone is equipped with cameras - an image. And in a mode that is unlikely to be recorded.
“It should be added that thanks to Starlink and the installed camera, the Russian Federation can use Shahed as an extremely long-range loitering munition with the ability to conduct additional reconnaissance and destroy even moving targets,” DE adds.
- RVvoenkor

Hope it's not a bluff...

Once again we would like to express our gratitude to the Ukrainian Armed Forces FPV drone operators, this time for destroying their own Polish PT-91 Twardy tank.

Thank you for cleaning Russian soil from Western trash!

https://t.me/lost_armour/3482?single

caveat emptor wrote:News of the day is that, finally, nuclear doctrine was updated and made to better fit modern day challenges.
Now, it covers whole Union state ( meaning Russia + Belarus) and expands on nuclear answer against non-nuclear states that are attacking Russia with the help of a nuclear one.
This opens doors to a possible tactical nuclear strike on Ukraine, as well as Poland, in regard to its stance towards
Russia and Belarus and complicity in whole Ukraine affair.
Incinerating Rzeszów will be a good warning to the rest of EU sycophants and US itself.
Nobody can say that Poland didn't ask for it with their bellicose rhetoric.
More details will be known when up to date official document is published on Kremlin's website.

https://t.me/rybar/63831

 Statements by Russian President Vladimir Putin at the meeting of the Security Council Standing Conference on Nuclear Deterrence

Key points:

The use of nuclear forces is an extreme measure to protect the country's sovereignty.

Reliable information about the launch of air and space attack weapons towards the Russian Federation will entail a nuclear response.

A critical threat to the sovereignty of the Russian Federation and non-nuclear weapons will be the basis for a nuclear response.

Russia is obliged to take into account the emergence of new sources of military threats and risks for itself and its allies.

Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in the event of aggression against Belarus.

The Russian Federation may consider the issue of using nuclear weapons after reliable data on a massive launch of missiles and UAVs when crossing the border.

The Russian Federation takes a highly responsible approach to nuclear weapons issues, seeking to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons and their components.

Russia has expanded the category of states and military alliances against which nuclear deterrence is carried out.

Today, the nuclear triad remains the most important guarantee of ensuring the security of our state.

In the updated version of the document, aggression against Russia by any non-nuclear state, but with the participation or support of a nuclear state, is proposed to be considered as a joint attack on the Russian Federation.

They should add one more, no matter what the source of the threat, the United States will automatically be included and extensively targeted beacuse 80 % of our warheads are targeted there by default.

Progress in Ugledar. Take it away from the bandera faggots  and their NAFO fluffers and make them all cry..  

   

Regarding the damage to the NS1 pipeline, the explosive charge only needs to rupture the line and trigger the loss of containment. It is the rapid depressurisation and release of stress at the damage site that causes the bulk of the damage.

Now that all thermal plants are out, destroy the remaining hydro plants, water and food storage all across Ukraine. This will increase the cost of NATO's upkeep for Ukraine.

The only point , I would add to revision of nuclear doctrine , is that non-destructive , followed by low-destructive use of nukes should be considered first , before using them for pinpoint- destructive followed by mass- destructive purposes . The cold war deterrence was established party because of numerous atmospheric tests by both sides ( non-destructive , forgetting the radiation ! ) on TV , that cheated many concerned mothers of a restful night's sleep , because of nightmare of the Armageddon . This pushed many , over the longer term to chain their babies to fence !

The Russian Federation may consider the issue of using nuclear weapons after reliable data on a massive launch of missiles and UAVs when crossing the border.

I'm wondering if a better response would be for Russia to exit the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty.

Then start live testing new designs for a compact but high yield nuke warheads. If I'm not mistaken, that US has quite a lead in this area with their W88 warhead, where the W88 has a greater yield compared to Russian warhead designs of the same weight. This is only based on articles I've read about this matter, perhaps someone can correct if this piece of info is just NATO propaganda.

Get ready: Russia has changed the conditions for the use of nuclear weapons, by Victoria Nikiforova for RiaNovosti. 09.26.2024.

On the evening of September 25, the Russian Security Council held its first open session. President Putin spoke on camera about how the country's nuclear doctrine would be changed. Such changes are adopted without delay, by presidential decree, and come into force immediately after it is signed. So the topic is relevant, one might say, hot.

The threshold for using all the means of our nuclear arsenal - the largest and most technologically advanced in the world - has been significantly lowered.

The loophole that allowed Western powers to fight Russia in a proxy mode, using the manpower of Ukrainians "and various other Swedes," has been eliminated. Now nuclear weapons can be used against non-nuclear states if they wage aggression against Russia with the help of a nuclear state.

"In the updated version of the document, aggression against Russia by any non-nuclear state, but with the participation or support of a nuclear state, is proposed to be considered as a joint attack on the Russian Federation," Vladimir Putin noted.

That is, the Americans, the British, the French will no longer be able to hide behind the backs of the Ukrainians, Poles, Romanians and the Balts. The response, if a corresponding decision is made, will come to everyone.

And then in the West they plunged into their favorite dreams about ubermensch who press buttons, sipping mojito thousands of kilometers from the front, and untermensch who die from Russian bombs and missiles. Now this division is abolished, nuclear weapons are the greatest equalizer.

The possibility of using nuclear weapons in response to attacks by aircraft, missiles and drones has been significantly expanded. And this is not only about carriers of nuclear weapons. Now Russia can respond to any attempt at a massive crossing of our air border.

The relevant provision was communicated to all our strategic opponents. "The conditions for Russia's transition to the use of nuclear weapons are also clearly stated. We will consider such a possibility upon receipt of reliable information about a massive launch of air and space attack weapons and their crossing our state border. I mean strategic or tactical aircraft, cruise missiles, drones, hypersonic and other aircraft," President Putin explained.

Another novelty - Russia will also use nuclear deterrence to protect its closest ally, Belarus . This is in case the slow-witted Poles or Ukrainians try to carry out sabotage there with conventional weapons.

For a long time, our country demonstrated astonishing nobility in trying to contain the rabid Western aggressors with non-nuclear means. We fought as if with our hands tied.

It is completely understandable why this was done. For us, Ukrainians will always be a part of the Russian people - fooled, embittered, but capable of re-education.

The Americans and Europeans took full advantage of this, openly fighting against Russia with the hands of Ukrainians. It turned out to be extremely convenient - they will sit thousands of kilometers from the LBS and pump Nezalezhnaya with money and weapons, and Ukrainian slaves will die for their interests.

Russia's efforts to show responsibility and unwillingness to destroy people were met with boos over our red lines. The height of impudence was Zelensky's request to allow him to strike American missiles at targets in the Russian rear. This idea was openly discussed in the style of "How will Moscow respond ? - Nothing, it's all a bluff!"

Well, it's time to see who's really bluffing. No sooner had President Putin announced changes to Russia's nuclear doctrine than the British tabloids howled like wolves at the moon: "Blood-chilling threats!", "Putin lowers threshold for use of nuclear weapons!"

The Daily Mail article is generously illustrated with photographs of our strategic intercontinental ballistic missile launches, and also goes into detail about a computer simulation that clearly shows what would be left of London if at least one of our nuclear-armed strategic missiles were to hit. Spoiler: nothing.

Do they understand the scale of the threat in the US ? There is a feeling that it is so important for the Democrats to retain power that they are not afraid of any risks and are ready to declare even a nuclear war a "new norm". That is why they continue to lie to the Americans that, supposedly, nothing will happen and it is all a bluff. Under these lies, the States risk turning into a backdrop for Fallout - a wonderful new series about a nuclear post-apocalypse.

Only Donald Trump's team clearly sees all the risks and speaks honestly about them . "Go and negotiate with Putin on Ukraine or face a nuclear war," his son and Kennedy Jr. warned the American establishment a week before the Russian president announced changes to our doctrine. Will the West hear these voices of reason and the warning from Moscow? The question is open.

https://ria.ru/20240926/rossiya-1974816257.html

this time for destroying their own Polish PT-91 Twardy tank.

Another overperforming Pole.

The Russian MoD reporting 2620 Ukrainian casualties over the past 24 hours including;

During the day, the losses of the Armed Forces amounted to more than 340 servicemen and 12 armored combat vehicles, as well as four artillery pieces and 11 vehicles.

https://function.mil.ru/news_page/country/more.htm?id=12530607@egNews

There is a suspicion that America has forgotten how to make engines for its main long-range bombers B-1B Lancer and B-52. And here we are for the entire range of our bombers , although with a creak in some cases, but we continue to produce. Russia is still confidently holding on to the top, having managed not to miss a single critical competence in the 90s. This fact alone can be used to assess the viability of different countries. wrote:

Arrow wrote:This is interesting. The US is losing its ability to produce engines for strategic aviation. Russia has resumed production of engines for the Tu 95MS without any problems and recently for the new Tu 160M, which is a very big achievement.

Russia is the last country that should be crowing about anyone losing their ability to produce aircraft engines