The Situation in the Ukraine. #9

Hope the novorussians are fully on guard considering the sharp increase of the US & cronies and ukrainain puppet's media anti-russian propaganda (claims of russian troops "entering Novorussia" and the of course "defenceful" redeployment of the ukrainian fascist regime troops). Something might be cooking.

mack8 wrote:Hope the novorussians are fully on guard considering the sharp increase of the US & cronies and ukrainain puppet's media anti-russian propaganda (claims of russian troops "entering Novorussia" and the of course "defenceful" redeployment of the ukrainian fascist regime troops). Something might be cooking.

They are. The claims of Russian troops being in Ukraine is no different than before. Apparently now they got T-80's from Russia.

http://russia-insider.com/en/military_politics_ukraine/2014/11/12/11-47-07am/slow_creep_war_east_ukraine

They are about on par in terms of manpower.

Apparently now they got T-80's from Russia.

Looks like rumors. Don't forget last time they spoke about sending T72B3. May be Russia run out of B3's already under hard strikes of ukraininan unstoppable 'cyborgs'...

Novorossiya is taking the right path by freeing itsslef from the clutches of oligarchic neoliberalism. Looks like it will be only east european territory ruled by the working class

Morpheus Eberhardt wrote:Novorussian column on 08 November 2014

Damn i love those trucks.

KomissarBojanchev wrote:Novorossiya is taking the right path by freeing itsslef from the clutches of oligarchic neoliberalism. Looks like it will be only east european territory ruled by the working class

You are very naive to think that.
Russian oligarchs will be over Novorossiya like flies when the war is over. If they aren't sending they stooges right now as we speak.

Russian oligarchs will be over Novorossiya

Oh, there are enough ukraininan oligarchs for that. Akhmetov, who was the one to organize all those demonstrations until Strelkov spoiled his game, and his tame Khodakovsky, for example. Don't think you'll see our lazy bastard fat cats who need a good kick every time money need t be invested somehow near there - ruined post-war Donbass isn't a lovely oil pump

Well I lost all hopes when I seen the priority of Moscow was to talk about gas prices in Minsk than anything else. They even agreed with stupidly low price for Ukraine..

They even agreed with stupidly low price for Ukraine..

Is 385$ a low price

http://lenta.ru/news/2014/11/14/boeing/



Interesting article, where is a satellite image of Ukrainian fighter launching missile on Malaysian B-777.

Faker than american wrestling.

What the author of this masterpeace seemed to not be aware of, is that cannon of Su-27 and deritatives is placed on the right side of the aircraft

It is not a tracer of gun round. If it is a gun fire, there would be more rounds tracers in the air and a fire light at gun barrel. This is most probably air to air missile.

Russian media is officially as "good" like Ukrainian one. I can PS better than that

Asf wrote:

They even agreed with stupidly low price for Ukraine..

Is 385$ a low price

For saloeds, yes. Fuck we paid same amount and apart from two way barking we never fought a war and we always paid in times. It's not fair for rest of the customers. Ukraine has to be charged way more.

medo wrote:It is not a tracer of gun round. If it is a gun fire, there would be more rounds tracers in the air and a fire light at gun barrel. This is most probably air to air missile.

It doesn't remotely look like AAM. Where's the smoke trail, for example?

Of course it's supposed to depict a bloody AAM, do you really think any sort of tracers are going to be visible from that distance and resolution? jesus christ...

It can be supposed to depict anything, but it sure as hell ain't AAM.

Compare it with the real launch, and differences are substantial:

According to satelite photos released the Malaisian flight downed above Donbass was downed by UKRANIAN SU-27 and here is the photo that prooves it
(that seems is the gift Vlad bringing to the G20 meeting)

http://f6.s.qip.ru/BckmC8hX.jpg

http://www.1tv.ru/news/leontiev/271824

Wow so quick to buy any idiotic image to fit Your agenda. Common people, don't be like Ukrainians. It's most likely a troll who send it to 1kanal and that's it

Regular wrote:Wow so quick to buy any idiotic image to fit Your agenda. Common people, don't be like Ukrainians. It's most likely a troll who send it to 1kanal and that's it

Don't be so quick to dismiss it... Obviously, a single image is worth crap, but that doesn't guarantee that this is a fake. 

I' going to parade this around the internet, and prove that those who say it is fake (because it was released by Russia) are worthless hypocrites.

We already have all evidence we need.

Fact is this is Operation Northwoods over Ukraine.

Fact is, nobody else had opportunity and capability to shoot it down but Ukraine (USA).
Fact is, it was ordered to fly over this territory by Ukraine, which confiscated all tower control radio chat with MH-17.
Fact is, bullet holes on the cockpit which is impossible without airforce engagement.
Fact is, shit was uploaded to frame novorussia and russia before it was downed.

Cui bono? USA.

Picture or not we already all know that this was false flag there is no other conclusion when looking at all facts and acts, confiscation of evidence and consealing evidences or by giving evidences to parties that already have chosen a side like UK "investigation" of black boxes.

Regular wrote:Wow so quick to buy any idiotic image to fit Your agenda. Common people, don't be like Ukrainians. It's most likely a troll who send it to 1kanal and that's it

And why you are so quick to call it fake? Please give a fucking logical reason to claim is fake other than your
constant baseless arguments , based on your common ignorance. You are so quick to support any photo regardless
of the source when is against the Russian government.. about its so called invasion.. but when any information is
released that shows Ukraine is guilty and RUssia is innocent of something you call it fake.?

There is a video that was leaked from BBC in Ukraine , that is british media not Russia propaganda as you call it.. that show witness of the accident in eastern ukraine saying they saw a military plane chasing the Civilian plane in flames.. the video was removed quickly by BBC because was "not accurate enough". Is not the first time they do that ,that remove videos that contradict their original story.  

Is really sinckening to watch again and again trolls like you ,like the ones you find in MP forums ,that believe they know everything and call Russian media "propaganda". Is the best media that exist in the moment..and the most closer thing you can get to fair media that report the information they have and do not force people to believe in their story and report what the other side claims. It can't be more objective than that.  

For several months already you and other trolls have been attacking for nothing Russian Media , but any idiot release a photo of a tank claiming "it proof of Russia invasion" without evidence of where the photo was taken or if it was edited and you have no problems to claim is the ultimate truth . Pathetic.

Werewolf wrote:We already have all evidence we need.

Fact is this is Operation Northwoods over Ukraine.

Fact is, nobody else had opportunity and capability to shoot it down but Ukraine (USA).
Fact is, it was ordered to fly over this territory by Ukraine, which confiscated all tower control radio chat with MH-17.
Fact is, bullet holes on the cockpit which is impossible without airforce engagement.
Fact is, shit was uploaded to frame novorussia and russia before it was downed.

Cui bono? USA.

Picture or not we already all know that this was false flag there is no other conclusion when looking at all facts and acts, confiscation of evidence and consealing evidences or by giving evidences to parties that already have chosen a side like UK "investigation" of black boxes.

That isn't what he was talking about... A picture (single one at that) is sketchy evidence that no one will take seriously, unless it is from NATO of course.

This is weeks old but still good.. Shows the experts opinions of the M-17 fuselage damage..



The above video proof almost without any possibility of doubt that a BUK missile WAS NOT what shot down
the malasyan plane.. because the missiles leave a huge smoke trail from the place is fired to the plane and last
up to 5 minutes.. and none of photos or videos released when the plane was falling shows that missile trail in the sky.
And shows experts investigation from Germany and Malasya that claims the images of the plane damage strongly suggest it was likely shot by Cannon fire.. from a military plane.