caveat emptor wrote: -country is militarily not ready for this escalation - Putin is not the right person for the job.
Why did Russia even start the "SMO" if it was not ready?
And what excuse does Putin and Russia have not being ready? Putin has led Russia for 24 years. How many more decades with Putin does Russia need to "be ready"?
There will be action one way or the other, however hesitant, and however much more escalation and debate and offers of negotiations and naval exercises and whatever else it will demand, and by that time a war with NATO will indeed be inevitable, all trains would have long left the stations and all ships set sail, there will be too much forward momentum to take a step back.
And that's the danger of the situation. The Russian failure to react in a timely manner in fact dissolves the chances of de-escalation, not improves it.
Last edited by flamming_python on 24/06/24, 06:18 am; edited 1 time in total
Karl Haushofer, owais.usmani, caveat emptor and billybatts91 like this post
flamming_python wrote:There will be action one way or the other, however hesitant, and however much more escalation and debate it will demand, and by that time a war with NATO will indeed be inevitable, all trains would have long left the stations and all ships set sail, there will be too much forward momentum to take a step back.
And that's the danger of the situation. The Russian failure to react in a timely manner in fact dissolves the chances of de-escalation, not improves it.
You can start with PMF, SAA, and LNA
With regard to Ukraine the precedent was already set by NATO and it’s going to be hard to justify any strikes on NATO without a good proxy force
But you can kill their troops and blow up their bases in Middle East, and LNA can hit Sigonella
You can also give the Kanaks of New Caledonia nice weapons too to shoot at French police the way they do in Dagestan
Odin of Ossetia wrote:Why attack Poland and Romania?
What would that achieve?
They are main logistical hubs for weapons and ammunition delivery to Ukraine. Donated planes are, very likely, already on their airports. Even if de jure they're not in a state of war with Russia, de facto situation on the ground is self-explanatory. This "special operation" is much bigger than even Russo-Ukrainian war for a while now. Obviously, there's always possibility that there are reasons retaliation against NATO didn't occur: -country is militarily not ready for this escalation - Putin is not the right person for the job.
I agree Putin is not the guy who should be the head of state of Russia.
Interesting information about terrorists in Dagestan:
https://t.me/milinfolive/124632?single
It is reported that among the terrorists were two sons of the head of the Sergokalinsky region of Dagestan, Magomed Omarov: Osman and Adil Omarov.
According to preliminary information, it was they who were eliminated and finished off by special forces during a shootout near the Tiger, and it was they who were caught in the video with weapons near the Patriot police officer.
There is no official confirmation of this information yet.
Military Informant
Shows dead bodies. NSFW:
Images or videos that are NSFW are to be shown as links or hidden with the spoiler option and a description of what is hidden so the viewer can decide to view or not. NSFW includes images of dead bodies. Porn is not allowed on this forum at all however.
Arkanghelsk wrote:You can start with PMF, SAA, and LNA
With regard to Ukraine the precedent was already set by NATO and it’s going to be hard to justify any strikes on NATO without a good proxy force
But you can kill their troops and blow up their bases in Middle East, and LNA can hit Sigonella
You can also give the Kanaks of New Caledonia nice weapons too to shoot at French police the way they do in Dagestan
So you're trying to say that Russia should start with something that the West has already been doing since February 24th, 2022 - that's to say arming and supplying and sending mercenaries to whoever Russia is at war with?
Russia should already have been doing all that. And starting to do that now will impress no-one. Time is running out for Russia to make an impression.
flamming_python wrote: So you're trying to say that Russia should start with something that the West has already been doing since February 24th, 2022 - that's to say arming and supplying and sending mercenaries to whoever Russia is at war with?
Russia should already have been doing all that. And starting to do that now will impress no-one. Time is running out for Russia to make an impression.
LDNR was already integrated into 1st and 2nd army corps
A real proxy is needed, PMR would be ideal but they can’t be supplied without direct land bridge
I don’t see how you can do it unless you just own it and say Russia is hitting NATO directly
But then you have WW3
Integrating the LDNR militias was a bad idea , they could have been used for these type of strikes
flamming_python wrote: So you're trying to say that Russia should start with something that the West has already been doing since February 24th, 2022 - that's to say arming and supplying and sending mercenaries to whoever Russia is at war with?
Russia should already have been doing all that. And starting to do that now will impress no-one. Time is running out for Russia to make an impression.
LDNR was already integrated into 1st and 2nd army corps
A real proxy is needed, PMR would be ideal but they can’t be supplied without direct land bridge
I don’t see how you can do it unless you just own it and say Russia is hitting NATO directly
But then you have WW3
Integrating the LDNR militias was a bad idea , they could have been used for these type of strikes
Bad miscalculation
That's easy, get Yanukovich to create a fake Ukrainian state and transfer him some Kalibrs
That will still get NATO involved directly. As they will attack those areas of Ukraine with full NATO force because of "Ma Article 5".
Ultimately, Russia has to do a no fly zone around the Black Sea closest to Crimea, shoot down all US Drones.
Apparently this ATACMS attack on the beaches was done via a launcher on a dry cargo ship. So that means also going and attacking and sinking Ukraine's shipping vessels.
Russia needs to learn how to do that part first (hitting UAV's where no one dies) before attempting others. Because if the Putin government and military are too weak and incompetent to do that, then you can forget about the rest.
GarryB, Odin of Ossetia, owais.usmani and lancelot like this post
flamming_python wrote: That's easy, get Yanukovich to create a fake Ukrainian state and transfer him some Kalibrs
It's too late for that. Yanukovich would have to control some territory in Ukraine for that. Maybe they could arm Hezbolah with actual ONIKS and other anti shipping missiles. Because, if Israel-Hez war starts you can bet your ass that US NAVY will be involved. Also, make arm shipments through Syria for Hez free flowing. Also, upgrading status of SMO would help with further mobilization of the country. Mostly in weapons production which is still not enough. A lot of new systems are nowhere to be seen after 2+ years of war.
sepheronx wrote:That will still get NATO involved directly. As they will attack those areas of Ukraine with full NATO force because of "Ma Article 5".
Ultimately, Russia has to do a no fly zone around the Black Sea closest to Crimea, shoot down all US Drones.
Apparently this ATACMS attack on the beaches was done via a launcher on a dry cargo ship. So that means also going and attacking and sinking Ukraine's shipping vessels.
Russia needs to learn how to do that part first (hitting UAV's where no one dies) before attempting others. Because if the Putin government and military are too weak and incompetent to do that, then you can forget about the rest.
They won’t declare article V, even if it’s a shoddy cover story, it’s still a cover story
And they will just accept it as low level escalation
I don’t think Putin is inept, I just think he listens to his oligarchs out of necessity
He has to balance the state interests with their economic interests and that’s remained true in spite of the repatriation of Oligarch assets to Russia
But I think once the escalation reaches a level , he can explain to them why it’s needed and that’s how the goal posts shift every couple of months
He has to let the escalation reach critical mass to have all decision makers onboard
If you think Putin is the sole decision maker, then that’s wrong
The council of 104 oligarchs decide things with him in silence at Novo Ogaryovo - it’s life
Arkanghelsk wrote: But I think once the escalation reaches a level , he can explain to them why it’s needed and that’s how the goal posts shift every couple of months
What level would that be? How many Russians need to die to "convince" Putin?
flamming_python wrote: That's easy, get Yanukovich to create a fake Ukrainian state and transfer him some Kalibrs
It's too late for that. Yanukovich would have to control some territory in Ukraine for that. Maybe they could arm Hezbolah with actual ONIKS and other anti shipping missiles. Because, if Israel-Hez war starts you can bet your ass that US NAVY will be involved. Also, make arm shipments through Syria for Hez free flowing. Also, upgrading status of SMO would help with further mobilization of the country. Mostly in weapons production which is still not enough. A lot of new systems are nowhere to be seen after 2+ years of war.
Arming Hezbollah won't stop the expansion of the war
Russia needs to show that it means business and doesn't give two shits. Anything less will be interpreted as a sign of weakness and that means further escalation.
Last edited by flamming_python on 24/06/24, 06:50 am; edited 1 time in total
Those oligarchs were somebodies maybe in London when they owned football clubs, but in Russia today they are nobodies. Just rich guys with big mansions and yachts that's it.
Russia is run by Putin and the security council, although that doesn't mean they ignore everyone else's interests. Just that they are the ones making the final decisions.
sepheronx, GarryB, PapaDragon, Karl Haushofer and lancelot like this post
To all the wankers and trollers out there. What did you expect from this SMO? Terrorists acts has been and will remain a threat to Russia - and elsewhere.
Same story with military and material casualties. Things get shot up and explode in battle you know. Shit happens. The Russian security forces has done a great job so far, but when the shit strikes the fan you all piss in your pants.
Stop being poesies and man up.
sepheronx, GarryB, xeno, PapaDragon, LMFS, Hole, lancelot and like this post
Odin of Ossetia and owais.usmani dislike this post
Yes, all this is to be expected. But those drones need to go down. Yemen does it quite often.
Only one issue, those drones are flying among flight of civil jets in the black sea. Even if they fly roughly 20K above the rest, if shot down, may damage civil jets below it.
Last edited by sepheronx on 24/06/24, 06:58 am; edited 1 time in total
GarryB, lancelot, Mir, Broski, Arkanghelsk and Belisarius like this post
To be frank Russia has only two things going for it versus the West.
1. Russia has nukes 2. Russia has less to lose in a nuclear war than the West.
In everything else Russia seems to be at the losing end.
The ultimate - and the only - trump card that Russia has is its nukes. And that in a nuclear war - even if both Russia and the West are destroyed - Russia still "wins" because it managed to wipe out the much richer, more populous and more economically powerful West.
The West does not want to be destroyed or wiped out. It wants to destroy Russia while preserving itself. Currently the Russian leadership - with its non-retaliation policy - is giving the West a signal that the West might be able to succeed in that.
Currently Russia is only hated and loathed. Instead Russia needs to be hated and feared. So start acting to install fear into your enemies. The current policies of Russia are doing the opposite.
Odin of Ossetia, owais.usmani and billybatts91 like this post